R-20 - Act respecting labour relations, vocational training and workforce management in the construction industry

Full text
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $5,000 to $50,000.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16; 2024, c. 19, s. 37.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,850 to $18,456.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2023) 155 G.O. 1, 776.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,766 to $17,622.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2022) 154 G.O. 1, 645.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,661 to $16,573.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2021) 153 G.O. 1, 673.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,622 to $16,183.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2020) 152 G.O. 1, 857.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,605 to $16,016.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2019) 151 G.O. 1, 757.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,575 to $15,713.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2018) 150 G.O. 1, 779.
113.2. Any person who uses intimidation or threats that are reasonably likely to compel an employer to make a decision regarding workforce management in the construction industry or to prevent the employer from making such a decision, or otherwise imposes such a decision is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,541 to $15,373.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
Any act listed or described in the second paragraph of section 101 constitutes a decision regarding workforce management.
2011, c. 30, s. 59; 2018, c. 12, s. 16.
See notice of indexation; (2017) 149 G.O. 1, 1213.
113.2. Any person who requires an employer to hire specific employees or a specific number of employees is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,541 to $15,373.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
2011, c. 30, s. 59.
See notice of indexation; (2017) 149 G.O. 1, 1213.
113.2. Any person who requires an employer to hire specific employees or a specific number of employees is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,518 to $15,146.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
2011, c. 30, s. 59.
See notice of indexation; (2016) 148 G.O. 1, 1180.
113.2. Any person who requires an employer to hire specific employees or a specific number of employees is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,497 to $14,935.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
2011, c. 30, s. 59.
See notice of indexation; (2015) 147 G.O. 1, 1143.
113.2. Any person who requires an employer to hire specific employees or a specific number of employees is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,478 to $14,748.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
2011, c. 30, s. 59.
See notice of indexation; (2014) 146 G.O. 1, 1151.
113.2. Any person who requires an employer to hire specific employees or a specific number of employees is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,454 to $14,507.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
2011, c. 30, s. 59.
See notice of indexation; (2013) 145 G.O. 1, 1242.
113.2. Any person who requires an employer to hire specific employees or a specific number of employees is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine of $1,440 to $14,372.
For any subsequent conviction, the fines are doubled.
2011, c. 30, s. 59.