Consolidated Statutes and Regulations
Consolidated Statutes
Consolidated Regulations
Annual Statutes and Regulations
Annual Statutes
Annual Regulations
Additional information
Québec Official Publisher
What’s new?
Information note
Policy of the Minister of Justice
Laws: Amendments
Laws: Provisions not in force
Laws: Provisions brought into force
Annual Statutes: PDF versions since 1996
Regulations: Amendments
Annual Regulations: PDF versions since 1996
Court Decisions
A-13.1.1, r. 1 - Individual and Family Assistance Regulation
Section 136
Disposition versions
136. (Revoked).
O.C. 1073-2006, s. 136; O.C. 861-2008, s. 11; 1312-2021O.C. 1312-2021, s. 51.
See Transitional provisions (O.C. 1312-2021).
136. The amount in section 131 is increased by an amount equal to the total value of the sums paid to a person pursuant to
(1) the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Public Curator of Québec v. Syndicat national des employés de l’hôpital St-Ferdinand, delivered on 3 October 1996;
(2) an agreement following a breast implant class action;
(3) recommendations in the report drawn up following the mandate given by the Government of Québec under Recommandations du Curateur public des mesures appropriées pour évaluer les pertes fiannciers causées aux personne représentés et les réparer (O.C. 931-98, 98-07-08), regarding damage suffered by certain persons represented by the Public Curator;
(4) the Court of Appeal of Québec judgment in Centre d’accueil Pavillon Saint-Théophile Inc. v. the Commission des droits de la personne, rendered on 21 September 1998;
(5) the Nova Scotia Memorandum of Understanding regarding Compensation for Survivors of Institutional Abuse regarding damage suffered by certain residents of provincially-operated institutions;
(6) the Superior Court judgment rendered on 14 September 2001 confirming the agreement with the Canadian Red Cross Society following the class action brought by persons who received a blood transfusion contaminated by the hepatitis C virus and who were infected by the virus before 1 January 1986 or between 1 July 1990 and 28 September 1998;
(7) the Superior Court judgment rendered on 25 April 2003 approving the agreement with Centerpulse Orthopedics Inc. and Centerpulse Ltd following the class action brought by persons who received a defective hip prosthesis; or
(8) the agreement concluded between the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse and the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, on 21 June 2007, in respect of the former residents of Pavillon des Pins.
