A-19.1 - Act respecting land use planning and development

Section 56.15 Disposition versions

2016-01-01

56.15. If the opinion of the Minister states that the by-law establishing the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan is not consistent with government policy directions, the council of the responsible body must, within 120 days after notification of the opinion, replace the by-law with another establishing a revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan that is consistent with those policy directions.

Sections 56.3 to 56.12 do not apply to the new by-law if the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan it establishes differs from the plan it replaces only so as to take account of the Minister’s opinion.

If, in accordance with section 239, the Minister extends the period prescribed in the first paragraph of this section or gives the responsible body additional time to replace the by-law establishing the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan, the Minister may give a new opinion, in accordance with section 56.14, despite the expiry of the period prescribed in that section. In that case, the council must replace the by-law establishing the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan by a new one which takes account of the new opinion, before the end of the later of

(1)  the one hundred and twentieth day after notification of the new opinion;

(2)  the last day of the period determined by having the extension period or additional time granted by the Minister begin on the date of notification of the new opinion.

1993, c. 3, s. 32; 1997, c. 93, s. 7; 2010, c. 10, s. 20; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

2010-06-02

56.15. If the opinion of the Minister states that the by-law establishing the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan is not consistent with government policy directions, the council of the responsible body must, within 120 days after service of the opinion, replace the by-law with another establishing a revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan that is consistent with those policy directions.

Sections 56.3 to 56.12 do not apply to the new by-law if the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan it establishes differs from the plan it replaces only so as to take account of the Minister’s opinion.

If, in accordance with section 239, the Minister extends the period prescribed in the first paragraph of this section or gives the responsible body additional time to replace the by-law establishing the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan, the Minister may give a new opinion, in accordance with section 56.14, despite the expiry of the period prescribed in that section. In that case, the council must replace the by-law establishing the revised metropolitan plan or RCM plan by a new one which takes account of the new opinion, before the end of the later of

(1)  the one hundred and twentieth day after service of the new opinion;

(2)  the last day of the period determined by having the extension period or additional time granted by the Minister begin on the date of service of the new opinion.

1993, c. 3, s. 32; 1997, c. 93, s. 7; 2010, c. 10, s. 20.

1997-12-19

56.15. If the opinion of the Minister states that the revised plan is not consistent with the aims and projects referred to in section 56.14, the council of the regional county municipality shall, within 120 days of service of the opinion, replace the revised plan with another which is consistent with those aims and projects.

A new revised plan which differs from the plan it replaces for the sole purpose of taking the opinion into account need not be preceded by the draft plans prescribed in sections 56.3 and 56.6. The third and fourth paragraphs of section 56.13 apply in respect thereof.

Where, in accordance with section 239, the Minister extends the period prescribed in the first paragraph of this section or grants a new period to the regional county municipality for replacing the revised plan, he may give a new opinion, in accordance with section 56.14, notwithstanding the expiry of the prescribed period. In such a case, the council shall replace the revised plan by a new one, which takes the new opinion into account, before the end of the later of the following days:

(1)  the one hundred and twentieth day after service of the new opinion;

(2)  the last day of the period established by causing the extension period or the new period granted by the Minister to begin on the date of service of the new opinion.

1993, c. 3, s. 32; 1997, c. 93, s. 7.

1993-05-01

56.15. If the opinion of the Minister states that the revised plan is not consistent with the aims and projects referred to in section 56.14, the council of the regional county municipality shall, within 120 days of service of the opinion, replace the revised plan with another which is consistent with those aims and projects.

A new revised plan which differs from the plan it replaces for the sole purpose of taking the opinion into account need not be preceded by the draft plans prescribed in sections 56.3 and 56.6. It shall be adopted by a by-law passed by a majority vote of the members of the council. The third and fourth paragraphs of section 56.13 apply in respect thereof.

Where, in accordance with section 239, the Minister extends the period prescribed in the first paragraph of this section or grants a new period to the regional county municipality for replacing the revised plan, he may give a new opinion, in accordance with section 56.14, notwithstanding the expiry of the prescribed period. In such a case, the council shall replace the revised plan by a new one, which takes the new opinion into account, before the end of the later of the following days:

(1)  the one hundred and twentieth day after service of the new opinion;

(2)  the last day of the period established by causing the extension period or the new period granted by the Minister to begin on the date of service of the new opinion.

1993, c. 3, s. 32.