32. Regional student ombudsmen may, if they consider that circumstances so warrant, refuse to examine a complaint or terminate the examination of a complaint where a proceeding is brought by the complainant before a court of justice or before a person or body of the administrative branch exercising adjudicative functions and the proceeding regards the facts on which the complaint is based and where, in the regional student ombudsmen’s opinion, the conclusions sought by bringing the proceeding are similar to the conclusions sought by drawing up the complaint.
They may also refuse to examine a complaint if they consider that another proceeding could adequately and within a reasonable time correct the situation giving rise to the complaint.
2022, c. 172022, c. 17, s. 32.