3118. The choice by the parties of the law applicable to a contract of employment cannot result in depriving the worker of the protection afforded to him by the mandatory rules of the law of the State where the worker habitually carries out his work, even if he is on temporary assignment in another State or, if the worker does not habitually carry out his work in any one State, of the law of the State where his employer has his domicile or establishment.
In the absence of a designation by the parties, the law of the State where the worker habitually carries out his work or the law of the State where his employer has his domicile or establishment is, in the same circumstances, applicable to the contract of employment.
1991, c. 64, a. 3118; I.N. 2014-05-01.