348. All proceedings against the property of a mutual company, in particular by seizure in the hands of a third person, seizure before judgment or seizure in execution, are to be suspended as soon as notice of the mutual company’s intention to apply for the full revocation of the authorization is published in accordance with section 173.
The costs incurred by a creditor after being informed of the liquidation must not be collocated out of the proceeds of the property of the mutual company that are distributed as a result of the liquidation.
A judge of the Superior Court of the district in which the mutual company’s head office is located may however, on the conditions the judge considers appropriate, authorize the institution of, or put an end to the stay of, a proceeding.
2018, c. 23, s. 32018, c. 23, s. 3.