Consolidated Statutes and Regulations
Consolidated Statutes
Consolidated Regulations
Annual Statutes and Regulations
Annual Statutes
Annual Regulations
Additional information
Québec Official Publisher
What’s new?
Information note
Policy of the Minister of Justice
Laws: Amendments
Laws: Provisions not in force
Laws: Provisions brought into force
Annual Statutes: PDF versions since 1996
Regulations: Amendments
Annual Regulations: PDF versions since 1996
Court Decisions
A-2 - Agricultural Abuses Act
Section 19
Disposition versions
19. The municipality responsible shall have a recourse for the reimbursement of the indemnities and valuation and arbitration costs which it has been called upon to pay pursuant to this Act, as the result of damage caused by a dog, against any person civilly responsible for compensating victims for such damage.
Where damage is caused by a dog kept outside the territory of the municipality, the same recourse may be had against the local municipality in whose territory such dog is kept, saving the local municipality’s right to exercise the recourse hereinabove provided for.
19. The municipality responsible shall have a recourse for the reimbursement of the indemnities and valuation and arbitration costs which it has been called upon to pay pursuant to this Act, as the result of damages caused by a dog, against any person civilly responsible for such damages.
Where damages are caused by a dog kept outside the territory of the municipality, the same recourse may be had against the local municipality in whose territory such dog is kept, saving the local municipality’s right to exercise the recourse hereinabove provided for.
19. The corporation responsible shall have a recourse for the reimbursement of the indemnities and valuation and arbitration costs which it has been called upon to pay pursuant to this act, as the result of damages caused by a dog, against any person civilly responsible for such damages.
Where damages are caused by a dog kept out of the municipality, the same recourse may be had against the local corporation in whose territory such dog is kept, saving the latter’s right to exercise the recourse hereinabove provided for.
