C-25.01, r. 6 - Rules of practice of the Superior Court of Québec in family matters

Full text
FORM II
(Rule 22)
CANADA SUPERIOR COURT
PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC FAMILY DIVISION
DISTRICT OF (Divorce)
NO.
PLAINTIFF(S)
and, where applicable,
DEFENDANT
ATTESTATION IN RESPECT OF THE REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS
No party’s birth was registered in Québec. (Do not fill out paragraphs 1 and 2. Enter the date and sign on page 2).
The wife’s birth was not registered in Québec. (Fill out paragraph 2 only. Enter the date and sign on page 2.)
The husband’s birth was not registered in Québec. (Fill out paragraph 1 only. Enter the date and sign on page 2.)
I hereby declare that:
(1) The wife was born on __________(date of birth)__________ at __________(place of birth)__________ and was baptized or her birth was registered on __________(date of baptism or civil registration)__________ at __________(parish and municipality, in case of baptism, or municipality, in case of civil registration)__________.
She is the daughter of ______________________________ and ______________________________.
OR (Form to be used where the act of birth was issued by the registrar of civil status.)
The wife is __________ years of age and the registration number of her act of birth in the register of civil status is ______________________________.
(2) The husband was born on __________(date of birth)__________ at __________(place of birth)__________ and was baptized or his birth was registered on __________(date of baptism or civil registration)__________ at __________(parish and municipality, in case of baptism, or municipality, in case of civil registration)__________.
He is the son of ______________________________ and ______________________________.
OR (Form to be used where the act of birth was issued by the registrar of civil status.)
The husband is __________ years of age and the registration number of his act of birth in the register of civil status is ___________(place and date)__________.

________________________________________
Party or parties
OR
Attorney for
Decision 96-09-16, s. 24; Decision 98-10-16, s. 3; Decision 2000-06-17, s. 5.