C-25.01, r. 0.2.1 - Regulation of the Superior Court of Québec in civil matters

Section 63 Disposition versions

2018-07-13

63. Commercial cases. All cases where the initial application is based principally, in whole or in part, on any of the following legislative provisions is a commercial case and is tried in the Commercial Chamber:

(Statutes of Canada)

— The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3);

— The Companies and Creditors’ Arrangement Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36);

— The Winding-Up and Restructuring Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. W-11);

— The Canada Business Corporations Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44);

— The Bank Act (S.C. 1991, c. 46 [R.S.C. 1985, c. B-1.01]);

— The Farm Debt Mediation Act (S.C. 1997, c. 21);

— The Commercial Arbitration Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. 17 (2nd Suppl.) [R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34.6]);

(Statutes of Québec)

— Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01):

– articles 527, 645 and 647 (homologation of an arbitration award);

– articles 507 and 508 (recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award made outside Québec);

— Companies Act (chapter C-38);

— Winding-Up Act (chapter L-4);

— Securities Act (chapter V-1.1);

— Act respecting the regulation of the financial sector (chapter E-6.1).

The same applies to any other case of a commercial nature, on a decision of the Chief Justice or a judge designated by the Chief Justice, made on initiative or on application.

Decision 2016-05-20, s. 63.

2016-06-16

63. Commercial cases. All cases where the initial application is based principally, in whole or in part, on any of the following legislative provisions is a commercial case and is tried in the Commercial Chamber:

(Statutes of Canada)

— The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3);

— The Companies and Creditors’ Arrangement Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36);

— The Winding-Up and Restructuring Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. W-11);

— The Canada Business Corporations Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44);

— The Bank Act (S.C. 1991, c. 46 [R.S.C. 1985, c. B-1.01]);

— The Farm Debt Mediation Act (S.C. 1997, c. 21);

— The Commercial Arbitration Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. 17 (2nd Suppl.) [R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34.6]);

(Statutes of Québec)

— Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01):

– articles 527, 645 and 647 (homologation of an arbitration award);

– articles 507 and 508 (recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award made outside Québec);

— Companies Act (chapter C-38);

— Winding-Up Act (chapter L-4);

— Securities Act (chapter V-1.1);

— Act respecting the Autorité des marchés financiers (chapter A-33.2).

The same applies to any other case of a commercial nature, on a decision of the Chief Justice or a judge designated by the Chief Justice, made on initiative or on application.

Decision 2016-05-20, s. 63.

Not in force

In force: 2016-06-16

63. Commercial cases. All cases where the initial application is based principally, in whole or in part, on any of the following legislative provisions is a commercial case and is tried in the Commercial Chamber:

(Statutes of Canada)

— The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3);

— The Companies and Creditors’ Arrangement Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36);

— The Winding-Up and Restructuring Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. W-11);

— The Canada Business Corporations Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44);

— The Bank Act (S.C. 1991, c. 46 [R.S.C. 1985, c. B-1.01]);

— The Farm Debt Mediation Act (S.C. 1997, c. 21);

— The Commercial Arbitration Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. 17 (2nd Suppl.) [R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34.6]);

(Statutes of Québec)

— Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01):

– articles 527, 645 and 647 (homologation of an arbitration award);

– articles 507 and 508 (recognition and enforcement of an arbitration award made outside Québec);

— Companies Act (chapter C-38);

— Winding-Up Act (chapter L-4);

— Securities Act (chapter V-1.1);

— Act respecting the Autorité des marchés financiers (chapter A-33.2).

The same applies to any other case of a commercial nature, on a decision of the Chief Justice or a judge designated by the Chief Justice, made on initiative or on application.

Decision 2016-05-20, s. 63.