3. The evaluation of the designated psychologist shall,(1) where the child is believed to be in one of the classes referred to in subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the first paragraph of section 1, be accompanied by a report stating reasons and indicating whether the child is in the class referred to in subparagraph 1 or in the class referred to in subparagraph 2 of the first paragraph of section 1; the report shall be based on the psychoeducational evaluation of an education consultant designated by the school body; the evaluation shall explain the situation of the child in relation to the school curricula;
(2) where the child has serious learning disabilities believed to be caused by a physical or sensory impairment that is persistent despite corrective intervention by a professional referred to in subparagraph 3 of the first paragraph of section 1, be accompanied by a report stating reasons and indicating whether the child is in the class referred to in subparagraph 3; the report shall be based on a physician’s certificate establishing whether the child has such an impairment and shall state the physician’s name and address without indicating, however, the nature of the physical or sensory impairment;
(3) where the child has serious learning disabilities believed to be caused by a mental deficiency or by a severe socio-affective malajustment, be accompanied by a report indicating whether the child is in the class referred to in subparagraph 3 of the first paragraph of section 1.