C-25.1 - Code of Penal Procedure

Updated to 13 October 2021

This document has official status.

chapter C-25.1

Code of Penal Procedure

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

DIVISION I INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS

1. This Code applies with respect to proceedings in view of imposing a penal sanction for an offence under any Act, except proceedings brought before a disciplinary body.

1987, c. 96, a. 1.

2. In this Code, unless the context indicates otherwise, “Act” means any law or regulation.

1987, c. 96, a. 2.

2.1. The provisions of this Code that apply to legal persons also apply to partnerships, with the necessary modifications.

2012, c. 25, s. 41.

2.2. In applying this Code, appropriate technological means that are available to both the parties and the court should be used whenever possible, taking into account the technological environment in place to support the business of the courts.

Subject to article 61, a judge may use such means or, if the interests of justice so require, order that such means be used by the parties, even on the judge’s own initiative, including for case management purposes, for holding hearings or for sending and receiving documents in a medium other than paper.

The judge must, before ordering that such means be used, give the parties an opportunity to submit observations.

2020, c. 12, s. 1; 2020, c. 29, s. 48.

3. The powers and duties conferred upon or assigned to a judge under this Code are exercised by the Court of Québec or a municipal court, within the scope of their respective jurisdictions under law, or by a justice of the peace within the limits provided by law and specified in his deed of appointment.

1987, c. 96, a. 3; 1988, c. 21, s. 148.

4. The judge hearing an application or trying a case has the necessary authority and powers, within the scope of his jurisdiction, to maintain order in the court room.

1987, c. 96, a. 4.

5. No person may be prosecuted for an offence he committed when under fourteen years of age.

1987, c. 96, a. 5.

6. The provisions specially relating to persons under eighteen years of age also apply to persons eighteen years of age or over in respect of offences committed by them before they were eighteen years of age.

However, article 7 does not apply to persons who are 20 years of age or over on the date their detention begins.

1987, c. 96, a. 6; 2017, c. 18, s. 92.

7. Where a judge orders the detention of a person under 18 years of age, the person must be kept in custody in a facility maintained by an institution operating a rehabilitation centre within the meaning of the Act respecting health services and social services (chapter S-4.2) or in a reception centre within the meaning of the Act respecting health services and social services for Cree Native persons (chapter S-5).

1987, c. 96, a. 7; 1992, c. 21, s. 359; 1994, c. 23, s. 23.

8. The procedure relating to contempt of court prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01), adapted as required, applies to contempt of court proceedings under this Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 8; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

8.1. Except in the case of a statement of offence for the contravention of a municipal by-law, a contribution of the following amounts shall be added to the total amount of the fine and costs imposed on the issue of a statement of offence for an offence under the laws of Québec:

(1)  $20, if the total amount of the fine does not exceed $100;

(2)  $40, if the total amount of the fine exceeds $100 without exceeding $500; and

(3)  25% of the total amount of the fine, if it exceeds $500.

The contribution becomes payable as a fine as soon as a defendant enters a plea of guilty or is convicted or deemed convicted of an offence, whether or not the contribution is mentioned in the judgment. Except as regards imprisonment, the rules provided in this Code for the recovery of a fine, including those relating to costs of execution, apply to the recovery of the contribution and the contribution is deemed, for such purposes, to form part of the fine. However, in the case of partial payment of a fine, the contribution is deemed paid last.

From each contribution collected, the first $10 shall be credited to the fund dedicated to assistance for persons who are victims of criminal offences that is established under the Act to assist persons who are victims of criminal offences and to facilitate their recovery (chapter P-9.2.1), and the following $8 shall be credited to the Access to Justice Fund established under the Act respecting the Ministère de la Justice (chapter M-19).

The amount of the contribution provided for in subparagraph 3 of the first paragraph is rounded down to the nearest dollar if it includes a dollar fraction that is less than $0.50, or up to the nearest dollar if it includes a dollar fraction that is equal to or greater than $0.50.

2002, c. 78, s. 1; 2012, c. 3, s. 4; 2015, c. 8, s. 345; 2020, c. 5, s. 213; 2021, c. 13, s. 140.

8.2. In search- and seizure-related matters, subsections 1 and 3 to 10 of section 488.01 and section 488.02 of the Criminal Code (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46) apply, with the necessary modifications and despite any inconsistent provision of any Act, to an application for and the execution of a warrant, telewarrant, order or other judicial authorization, for the purposes of a penal investigation, that allows the use of an investigative technique or method or the performance of any act mentioned in the warrant, telewarrant, order or authorization, where the application or execution concerns a journalist’s communications or a thing, document or data relating to or in the possession of a journalist.

A judge having jurisdiction to issue a warrant, telewarrant, order or other judicial authorization referred to in the first paragraph has jurisdiction to exercise the powers necessary for the application of subsections 9 and 10 of section 488.01 of the Criminal Code.

2018, c. 26, s. 9.

DIVISION II RIGHT TO PROSECUTE

9. The following may be prosecutors:

(1)  the Attorney General;

(1.1)  the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions;

(2)  a prosecutor designated under any Act other than this Code, to the extent determined in that Act;

(3)  a person authorized by a judge to institute proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 9; 2005, c. 34, s. 45.

10. An application for the authorization contemplated in paragraph 3 of article 9 shall be made in writing or orally to a judge having jurisdiction in the judicial district in which the prosecutor may institute proceedings.

The judge examines the allegations in support of the application. The judge may, if of the opinion that it is necessary, hear the applicant. The judge may also examine the sworn depositions of witnesses and, for that purpose, the judge has the power to compel them to appear and to testify. The judge must use all necessary means to ensure the confidentiality of the writings, where applicable.

The judge shall authorize the proceedings if he has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed. The authorization must be entered with the statement of offence and a duplicate of the statement must be transmitted on request by the clerk to the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions.

1987, c. 96, a. 10; 1995, c. 51, s. 1, s. 49; 2005, c. 34, s. 85; 2020, c. 29, s. 49.

11. The Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions may, if of the opinion that the public interest so requires,

(1)  intervene as a party in first instance to take or not take the place of the party who instituted proceedings;

(2)  intervene as a party in appeal to take or not take the place of the party who was prosecutor in first instance;

(3)  order proceedings stayed before judgment is rendered in first instance, whether or not the proceedings were instituted by the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions or by any other prosecutor; and

(4)  allow proceedings to be continued within six months of being stayed, whether or not the proceedings were instituted by the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions or by any other prosecutor.

The intervention, stay or continuation commences, without notice or formality and without having to prove an interest, when the representative of the Attorney General or of the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions informs the clerk. The clerk shall inform the parties without delay.

Where the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions intervenes as a party to a proceeding, he becomes a party to any subsequent proceeding.

The intervention of either as a party in first instance to take the place of the party who instituted proceedings modifies the designation of the prosecutor in the statement of offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 11; 2005, c. 34, s. 46; 2020, c. 12, s. 2.

11.1. In a proceeding involving a public interest issue, the judge, even on his own initiative, may order the prosecutor to invite the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions to intervene.

2020, c. 12, s. 2.

12. The prosecutor may withdraw a count at any time before trial. During trial, no count may be withdrawn except with leave of the judge.

The prosecutor must send a notice of withdrawal to the defendant and to the clerk if either is not present when it is made.

1987, c. 96, a. 12.

13. No defendant may be prosecuted a second time for an offence for which proceedings were not continued within six months of being stayed or in respect of which the count has been withdrawn.

1987, c. 96, a. 13.

DIVISION III PRESCRIPTION

14. Penal proceedings are prescribed by one year from the date of commission of the offence.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to a specific provision, the law may fix a different time limit or provide that prescription begins to run from the date the commission of the offence becomes known or from the date an event determined in the law occurs.

A defendant may, with the consent of the prosecutor, waive acquired prescription with regard to the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 14; 2003, c. 5, s. 16; 2020, c. 12, s. 3.

15. Prescription is interrupted by the service of a statement of offence on the defendant.

Upon the application of a prosecutor who establishes that he has attempted unsuccessfully to serve a statement of offence on the defendant, the judge shall declare prescription to be interrupted from the date of the application; he shall attest the date of interruption on the statement of offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 15.

16. Prescription is not interrupted where the proceedings were instituted by a prosecutor lacking authority to prosecute or where the person who issued the statement of offence in the name of the prosecutor was not authorized to do so.

1987, c. 96, a. 16.

DIVISION IV COMPUTATION OF TIME

17. In computing any period of time under this Code, the day which marks the start of the period is not counted but, except in the case of clear days, the terminal day is counted.

Saturdays and holidays are counted, but when the last day is a Saturday or a holiday, the period is extended to the next following working day.

1987, c. 96, a. 17; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

18. The following are holidays:

(1)  Sundays;

(2)  1 and 2 January;

(3)  Good Friday;

(4)  Easter Monday;

(5)  the Monday preceding 25 May;

(6)  24 June;

(7)  1 July, or 2 July when 1 July is a Sunday;

(8)  the first Monday of September;

(9)  the second Monday of October;

(10)  25 and 26 December;

(11)  any other day fixed by proclamation or order of the Government as a public holiday or as a day of thanksgiving.

1987, c. 96, a. 18; 1990, c. 4, s. 2; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

DIVISION V SERVICE OF WRITTEN PROCEEDINGS

19. Service of a written proceeding prescribed by this Code or the court regulations may be made by any appropriate method that provides the person serving the proceeding with proof that the proceeding was delivered, sent or published.

Such methods include service by registered mail, courier or another carrier, by technological means, by a peace officer or bailiff or by public notice.

Whatever the method of service used, the proceeding is deemed to have been served on an addressee if he acknowledges receipt of it or admits having received it.

1987, c. 96, a. 19; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP); 2020, c. 12, s. 4.

19.1. A proceeding, other than a statement of offence, an application for revocation of a judgment, a notice of appeal or an application for leave to appeal, may be served only on the defendant’s attorney if the defendant is so represented.

2020, c. 12, s. 4.

20. Service by registered mail or by courier or another carrier is made by sending the proceeding to the addressee’s residence or business establishment or, in the case of a legal person, to its head office, one of its establishments or the establishment of one of its agents. A proceeding is considered to be mailed by registered mail if attestation is made of its delivery or receipt.

The proceeding may also be sent to a person designated by the addressee or to the addressee’s elected domicile recorded in the register of enterprises. If the addressee has no residence, head office, establishment, or agent having an establishment in Québec, the proceeding, including those mentioned in article 19.1, may be sent to the attorney representing the person.

Where attestation is made of receipt of the proceeding, service is deemed to have been made on the date on which the notice of receipt was signed by the addressee or any other person to whom the proceeding may be delivered under article 21. Where attestation is made of delivery of the proceeding, service is deemed to have been made on the date of the notice of delivery, unless imprisonment of the addressee is requested.

1987, c. 96, a. 20; 1992, c. 61, s. 2; 1999, c. 40, s. 57; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP); I.N. 2017-02-01; 2020, c. 12, s. 4.

20.1. Service of a summons may also be made by ordinary mail. If the witness is a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act, he may also be summoned by means of a notice sent to him in the manner agreed to between the prosecutor and the authority to whom the peace officer or the person reports.

1995, c. 51, s. 3; 2020, c. 12, s. 5.

20.2. Service by a technological means is made by sending the proceeding to the address indicated by the addressee as the address where the addressee accepts to receive the proceeding, or to the address that is publicly known as the address where the addressee accepts to receive documents, provided the address is active at the time of sending.

However, service by a technological means on a party not represented is permitted only with the party’s consent or if authorized by a judge.

Service is presumed to have been made on the day the proceeding was sent. If the proceeding was sent after 5 p.m. on a Saturday or on a holiday, service is presumed to have been made on the following working day.

2020, c. 12, s. 6.

21. Service by a peace officer or bailiff is made by delivery of the proceeding to the addressee. It may also be made at the addressee’s residence by delivery of the proceeding to a person who appears to be capable of receiving it.

Service on a legal person may be made at its head office, one of its establishments or the establishment of one of its agents by delivery of the proceeding to one of its directors, officers or agents or to a person in charge of the premises. Service may also be made by delivering the proceeding to one of its directors, officers or agents, regardless of location.

Service may also be made by delivery of the proceeding to a person designated by the addressee or to a person in charge of the addressee’s elected domicile recorded in the register of enterprises. If the addressee has no residence, head office, establishment, or agent having an establishment in Québec, service may be made by delivering the proceeding, including those mentioned in article 19.1, to the attorney representing the addressee.

If the proceeding cannot be delivered, the person serving the proceeding shall record that fact, along with the place, date and time of the unsuccessful delivery, and shall leave the proceeding at an appropriate place in a sealed envelope or in any other form that protects its confidentiality. Service is deemed to have been made on that date, unless imprisonment of the addressee is requested.

1987, c. 96, a. 21; 2020, c. 12, s. 7.

22. Service of a written proceeding on a person in detention in a facility referred to in article 7, detention centre or penitentiary is made by delivery of the proceeding to the person by a peace officer or bailiff.

1987, c. 96, a. 22; 1992, c. 21, s. 360.

22.1. Service by public notice is made with the authorization of a judge. It may also be made by the bailiff who tried unsuccessfully to serve the proceeding on the addressee and who recorded that fact, unless imprisonment of the addressee is requested.

Service by public notice is made by publishing a notice directing the addressee to retrieve the proceeding at the place specified in the notice within 30 days of the publication of the notice. The notice must mention the judge’s authorization or the bailiff’s attempt to serve the proceeding.

The notice must be published by any means likely to reach the addressee, such as by publishing it in a newspaper circulated in the municipality of the addressee’s last known address, by posting it on the website of such a newspaper, on a website recognized by an order of the Minister of Justice or at the office of the court. The notice must be published only once in a printed newspaper or for 30 days on a website or at the office of the court; if the circumstances so require, the notice may be published more than once.

Service is deemed to have taken place on the expiry of the time specified in the notice for retrieving the proceeding.

2020, c. 12, s. 8.

23. A written proceeding may be served outside Québec on a natural person who has no residence in Québec or on a legal person which has neither head office nor place of business in Québec nor any agent having a place of business in Québec; service is made by mail or, where an agreement exists between the Gouvernement du Québec and the government of another province or country, in the manner prescribed by that agreement.

1987, c. 96, a. 23.

24. A judge may authorize service otherwise than as in this division where circumstances so require.

Where a judge’s authorization is required under this division, the prosecutor or the person who must serve the proceeding may obtain the authorization from a judge of the district where service is to be made if it is not the district where the proceeding is issued or from a judge of the judicial district referred to in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3.

1987, c. 96, a. 24; 1995, c. 51, s. 4; 2005, c. 27, s. 1; 2020, c. 12, s. 9.

25. Where the person being served a written proceeding refuses to receive it, the person serving it shall record the refusal, with the place, date and time of refusal. The proceeding is then deemed to have been served at the time of refusal.

The person serving the proceeding must then attempt to leave a copy of it by any appropriate means.

1987, c. 96, a. 25.

26. A person who serves a written proceeding shall make an attestation of service.

He shall record his name, the name of the person to whom he delivered the proceeding, and the place, date and time of service.

Every attestation of service is deemed to have been made under oath.

1987, c. 96, a. 26.

27. Where service is made by registered mail or by courier or another carrier, the notice of receipt or, as the case may be, the notice of delivery serves as an attestation of service. Failing that, the sender’s declaration that the document was sent, with a reference to the delivery or receipt status, serves as an attestation of service.

1987, c. 96, a. 27; 1992, c. 61, s. 3; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP); I.N. 2017-02-01; 2020, c. 12, s. 10.

27.1. Where service is made by a technological means, the sender must keep the information that establishes the date, hour and minute of sending, as well as its source and destination.

That information serves as an attestation of service.

2020, c. 12, s. 11.

27.2. Where service is made by public notice, a copy of the notice, showing the date and the method or place of publication, serves as an attestation of service.

2020, c. 12, s. 11.

28. Where this Code requires service on the parents of a person under eighteen years of age, it must be made on his father and mother or, as the case may be, any other person having parental authority. The same rule applies where they must be given notice.

1987, c. 96, a. 28.

29. Service which is irregular in any way remains valid if a judge is satisfied, at any stage of proceedings, that the person for whom it is intended has examined the written proceeding. The judge may make any order which the ends of justice require.

1987, c. 96, a. 29.

DIVISION VI MAKING OF APPLICATIONS

30. Unless otherwise provided, an application to a judge under this Code or the court regulations is made orally, without prior notice.

Where an oral application requires prior notice, the notice must briefly and precisely state the nature of the application and the grounds on which it is based, and indicate at what date and place it will be made.

1987, c. 96, a. 30; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

31. A written application must briefly and precisely state the facts and grounds on which it is based and the conclusions sought. It must be accompanied with an affidavit attesting the truth of the facts stated.

Prior notice must be given of the date and place of a written application, except an application for the authorization contemplated in paragraph 3 of article 9.

1987, c. 96, a. 31; 2020, c. 29, s. 50.

32. Unless otherwise provided, every prior notice and, where such is the case, every written application and affidavit must be served on the adverse party not less than five clear days before the date of the application and must be filed in the office of the court of competent jurisdiction in the place where the application is to be made within the same time unless another time is fixed by the court regulations.

1987, c. 96, a. 32; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

33. An application is contested orally, unless the judge allows a contestation in writing.

1987, c. 96, a. 33.

34. When a question referred to in articles 76 to 78 of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) arises, the notice periods prescribed in those articles may not operate to delay the release of the defendant or a witness.

1987, c. 96, a. 34; 2005, c. 34, s. 47; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

DIVISION VII PROCURING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES

35. Each party may, by way of summons, summon his witnesses himself or request a judge or a clerk of the court of competent jurisdiction in the judicial district where the witness is to be heard to make the summons.

A summons requires the witness designated therein by name to attend at the date, time and place indicated to testify and, where such is the case, to bring with him anything mentioned that is relevant to the issue and in his possession or under his control.

1987, c. 96, a. 35.

35.1. Where the witness is resident in another province or in a territory of Canada, the rules applicable to the calling of witnesses and immunity set out in article 497 of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) apply, with the necessary modifications.

Where a person resident in Québec is summoned under a summons of another province or of a territory of Canada to testify in a penal case, the summons is homologated in accordance with the rules set out in article 498 of that Code, with the necessary modifications.

For the purposes of those rules, the powers conferred on the court are exercised by a judge.

2020, c. 12, s. 12.

36. A witness served with a summons is required to attend at the date, time and place indicated therein and to remain in attendance until the judge before whom he is called to testify releases him from that obligation.

1987, c. 96, a. 36.

37. A summons must be signed by the judge or the clerk or by the attorney of the party who summons the witness.

1987, c. 96, a. 37.

38. The authorization of a judge is required and must be recorded with the summons where the witness is

(1)  a minister or deputy minister of the Government;

(2)  a judge;

(3)  a person in detention in a facility referred to in article 7, a detention centre or a penitentiary.

The judge may grant the authorization only if he is satisfied that the testimony of the witness is useful to allow the prosecutor to prove the commission of an offence, to afford the defendant the benefit of a full and complete defence or to allow the judge to rule on a question submitted to him.

1987, c. 96, a. 38; 1992, c. 21, s. 361; 1995, c. 51, s. 49.

39. Where the witness summoned is a person in detention, the director of the facility maintained by an institution referred to in article 7 or the director of the correctional facility or penitentiary must ensure that he is brought to the place indicated in the summons at the date and time indicated therein.

1987, c. 96, a. 39; 1992, c. 21, s. 362; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

40. A summons must be served not less than five clear days before the date of examination of the witness. Where the witness is a judge or a minister or deputy minister of the Government, the summons must be served not less than ten clear days before the date of his examination.

1987, c. 96, a. 40.

41. In case of urgency, a judge or a clerk having authority to sign a summons may, upon an application, reduce the time for service of a summons to not less than 12 hours before the witness is to be examined. However, where the witness is a judge or a minister or deputy minister of the Government, only a judge may authorize a reduction of the time for service.

The authorization to reduce the time must be recorded with the summons.

1987, c. 96, a. 41; 1995, c. 51, s. 49.

42. A judge before whom a witness is called to appear who finds that the witness has failed to appear before him or has left the place of the hearing without having been released from the obligation of remaining in attendance may

(1)  order that a new summons be served on the witness by a bailiff or that it be served to the witness by a peace officer by registered mail; or

(2)  issue a warrant for witness if he is satisfied that the witness can give useful evidence and, on the strength of proof of the receipt of the summons, that he was duly summoned, or that the witness is attempting to evade justice.

1987, c. 96, a. 42; 1995, c. 51, s. 5; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP); I.N. 2017-02-01; 2020, c. 12, s. 13.

43. A warrant for witness shall also be issued by a judge of the judicial district where the witness is to be examined if the judge is satisfied that the witness can give useful evidence and

(1)  will not appear to testify even if duly summoned;

(2)  is evading service of a summons;

(3)  has failed to comply with the conditions determined under article 51.

1987, c. 96, a. 43; 2020, c. 12, s. 14.

44. A warrant for witness must designate the witness by name and state the reason for which it is issued. It is an order to arrest the witness and bring him before a judge. It must be signed by the judge who issues it.

1987, c. 96, a. 44; 2020, c. 12, s. 14.

45. A warrant for witness is executory at any time, anywhere in Québec, by any peace officer or bailiff.

A warrant for witness not executed within one year of its issue is null. A warrant for witness may, however, be renewed before the expiry of that time by the judge who issued it.

1987, c. 96, a. 45; 2020, c. 12, s. 14.

46. Any person arresting a witness under a warrant for witness must

(1)  state his name and quality to the witness;

(2)  inform the witness of the grounds for his arrest;

(3)  allow the witness to examine the warrant, or if it is not in his possession, promptly allow him to examine it;

(4)  if the arrest is carried out in a dwelling house under a warrant or telewarrant of entry, allow the witness and, where applicable, the person in charge of the premises to examine the warrant or telewarrant or, if it is not in his possession, promptly allow them to examine it.

He shall not use more force than necessary.

1987, c. 96, a. 46; 2020, c. 12, s. 15.

47. Subject to article 94.1, a person executing a warrant for witness may enter any place where he has reasonable grounds to believe the witness he has been ordered to arrest is to be found, in order to arrest him.

Before entering the place, he shall give a notice to a person in the place of his presence and of the purpose of his presence, unless he has reasonable grounds to believe that that would allow the witness to abscond.

1987, c. 96, a. 47; 2020, c. 12, s. 16.

48. A witness under eighteen years of age who is arrested must be committed to the custody of the director of youth protection in the place of the arrest.

The director shall see to it that the witness is kept in custody in a facility referred to in article 7 until he is brought before a judge. Moreover, the director shall make every reasonable effort in the circumstances to notify the parents of the witness without delay of their child’s arrest, of the grounds for his arrest, of the place where he is being kept and of the appointed time and place of his appearance before a judge.

1987, c. 96, a. 48; 1992, c. 21, s. 363.

49. Except in the case of article 48, a bailiff who makes an arrest under a warrant for witness must, as soon as possible, commit the arrested person to the custody of a peace officer so that the officer may bring him before a judge.

1987, c. 96, a. 49; 2020, c. 12, s. 17.

50. After his arrest, the witness must be brought, promptly and at the latest within twenty-four hours, before the judge before whom he is to testify or, if he is not sitting, before another judge of the judicial district where he is to testify. If no judge is available within the prescribed time, the witness must be brought before a judge of the district as soon as possible.

1987, c. 96, a. 50.

51. The judge before whom the arrested witness is brought shall order his release on such conditions as he may determine, particularly the furnishing of security, if he is satisfied that the detention of the witness is not necessary to ensure his attendance at the hearing where his testimony is required; otherwise, the judge shall order that the witness continue to be detained.

Except where the warrant for witness was issued under paragraph 1 of article 43, the judge, after giving the witness an opportunity to justify his conduct, may also award against him all or part of the costs arising from his failure to appear or remain in attendance. The amount of the costs is fixed by regulation and the judge shall allow not less than thirty days for payment.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no case may a witness under eighteen years of age be required to furnish or pay security or costs in excess of $500.

1987, c. 96, a. 51; 2015, c. 26, s. 2; 2020, c. 12, s. 18.

52. The order for unconditional or conditional release or for continued detention may, on application, be reviewed by a judge of the Superior Court of the judicial district where the order was made.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on any parties concerned and on the witness concerned by the order.

If the judge orders the detention of a witness who has been released, he must issue a warrant of committal against him.

1987, c. 96, a. 52; I.N. 2021-03-18.

53. Examination of a witness detained in custody must begin without undue delay and not later than the eighth day following his arrest or the order for continued detention made by the Superior Court; otherwise, the witness must be released unconditionally unless he is detained for some other reason.

Where a judge orders the detention of a witness to be continued, he may reschedule the hearing to an earlier date so that examination of the witness may begin within the prescribed time. The clerk must notify the parties accordingly.

1987, c. 96, a. 53.

DIVISION VIII ROGATORY COMMISSION

54. On the application of a party wishing to examine a witness, a commissioner may be appointed to receive the deposition of a witness who is unable to attend to testify because of his state of health or who is outside Québec despite the efforts made to procure his attendance.

The judge shall not make such an appointment unless the testimony is essential to the determination of the case.

1987, c. 96, a. 54.

55. Before trial, the application must be made to a judge having jurisdiction to try the case in the judicial district where proceedings have been instituted; during trial, the application must be made to the judge trying the case, with his leave. The judge who hears the application may agree to act as the commissioner.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the adverse party unless both parties are before the judge. The notice must be filed in the office of the court of competent jurisdiction in the judicial district where proceedings have been instituted or the case is being tried, as the case may be.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the application is made by the defendant, prior notice may be given in accordance with the third paragraph of article 169.

1987, c. 96, a. 55.

56. The order appointing a commissioner shall set out such provisions as are necessary to enable the parties to be present or to be represented when the deposition is received.

1987, c. 96, a. 56.

57. Unless inconsistent with this division or with the court regulations, the rules provided in the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) as to the procedure for the appointment of commissioners, the recording of depositions by commissioners and the attestation and the return of depositions, adapted as required, apply to a commission constituted pursuant to this Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 57; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

58. To be admissible in evidence, a deposition received by a commissioner must be supported by an affidavit or oral evidence attesting

(1)  that the witness was outside Québec or was unable to attend to testify because of his state of health;

(2)  that the deposition of the witness was received in accordance with this division and signed by the commissioner;

(3)  that the provisions set out in the order to enable the parties to be present or to be represented were complied with;

(4)  that the adverse party was given reasonable notice of the time when the deposition was to be received;

(5)  that the adverse party was given the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.

1987, c. 96, a. 58.

59. A witness whose deposition was received by a commissioner may, with leave of the trial judge, be re-examined at the hearing if he is then able to attend to testify.

1987, c. 96, a. 59.

DIVISION IX DEFENSES AND GENERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

60. The defenses and the justifications and excuses recognized in penal matters or, adapted as required, in criminal matters apply subject to the rules provided in this Code or in any other Act.

1987, c. 96, a. 60.

61. The rules of evidence in criminal matters, including the Canada Evidence Act (Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, chapter C-5), apply to penal matters, adapted as required and subject to the rules provided in this Code or in any other Act in respect of offences thereunder and subject to article 283 of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) and the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (chapter C-1.1).

The provisions of the Criminal Code (Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, chapter C-46) relating to video and audio evidence apply, having regard to the resources put at the disposal of the court, to the trial of proceedings instituted in accordance with this Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 61; 2001, c. 32, s. 91; 2002, c. 21, s. 50; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

62. The statement of offence or any offence report, in the form prescribed by regulation, has the same value and effect as evidence given under oath by the peace officer or the person entrusted with the enforcement of any Act who issued the statement or drew up the report, if he attests on the statement or report that he personally ascertained the facts stated therein.

The same applies to a copy of the statement or report certified by a person authorized to do so by the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 62.

62.1. The form of an offence report shall be prescribed by regulation.

Not in force

A statement of offence that has been issued by has not been served on the defendant may serve as an offence report.

1995, c. 51, s. 6; 2001, c. 32, s. 92.

63. The defendant may require that the prosecutor summon as a witness the person whose statement or report has the same value and effect as evidence.

The costs, the maximum amount of which is fixed by regulation, shall be awarded against the defendant if he is convicted of the offence and the judge is satisfied that the statement, report or copy would have afforded sufficient evidence and that the person’s testimony added nothing substantial.

1987, c. 96, a. 63.

64. The prosecutor is not required to allege in the statement of offence that the defendant does not have, with respect to the offence, the benefit of an exception, exemption, excuse or justification provided for by law.

It is incumbent upon the defendant to establish that he has the benefit of an exception, exemption, excuse or justification provided for by law.

1987, c. 96, a. 64.

65. Where the prosecutor alleges that the defendant is the owner or lessee of an immovable, he is not obliged to prove it unless the defendant so requires and notifies the prosecutor accordingly not less than ten days before the appointed date for the beginning of the trial; the prosecutor may waive such notice.

1987, c. 96, a. 65.

66. Proof of the issue and content of any certificate, licence, permit or other authorization required by an Act for the carrying on of an activity may be made by producing, before the judge, either the authorization or an attestation signed by the person having the authority to issue such authorization.

Proof that the authorization was not granted or was suspended or that conditions or restrictions were attached to the authorization may be established by means of an attestation signed by the person having the authority to issue such authorization.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where it is alleged that the defendant failed to comply with the obligation imposed by an Act to hold such authorization, he must establish the fact that he holds the authorization.

1987, c. 96, a. 66; 1992, c. 61, s. 4; 1995, c. 51, s. 7.

66.1. The sending of a document by the prosecutor, a government department or body or the office of the court may be attested by means of an extract from the record certified by the person having custody thereof and indicating that the document was sent or by means of a writing signed by the person who sent the document.

1995, c. 51, s. 8.

67. Any certificate containing extracts from a register kept under or for the purposes of an Act by a government department or a public body and signed by the person having custody of the register constitutes, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, proof of the information contained in the certificate.

1987, c. 96, a. 67; 1995, c. 51, s. 9.

67.1. (Repealed).

1995, c. 51, s. 10; 2001, c. 32, s. 93.

68. A copy of a document has the same probative value as the original if it is certified by the person who is authorized under an Act to issue copies of the document.

1987, c. 96, a. 68.

69. Proof of the acquittal or conviction of the defendant, of the withdrawal or of the dismissal of a count, of the judicial stay or cancellation of proceedings or of the suspension of proceedings may be established by means of a certificate attesting such fact, signed by the judge who rendered the judgment or decision or by the clerk who entered it in the minutes or by means of a copy, certified by the court clerk, of the judgment, decision or minutes.

In the case of a conviction under article 165, proof of the judgment may be established by the prosecutor by means of a document attesting receipt of the plea of guilty or payment, by the defendant, of the whole amount of the fine and costs requested.

Proof of a stay of proceedings ordered by the Attorney General or by the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions may be established by means of a certificate attesting such fact, signed by the clerk who entered the order in the minutes or by means of a copy of the minutes, certified by the court clerk.

The certificate or the copy of the minutes attesting the dismissal of a count, the judicial stay of proceedings or the suspension of proceedings must set out the grounds therefor.

1987, c. 96, a. 69; 1992, c. 61, s. 5; 2005, c. 27, s. 2; 2005, c. 34, s. 86.

70. The criminal and penal prosecuting attorney is deemed to be a person authorized to act in the name of the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions and is not required to prove such authorization.

Any other person authorized by the Attorney General or by the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions to act in his name and any person authorized to act on behalf of a person designated by virtue of an Act by the National Assembly or of a government department, public body or legal person is not required to prove such authorization unless the defendant contests the authorization and the judge is of opinion that proof thereof must be made.

1987, c. 96, a. 70; 1992, c. 61, s. 6; 2005, c. 34, s. 48.

70.1. The signature of the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions or a criminal and penal prosecuting attorney on a statement of offence may be affixed by means of an automatic device or in the form of an engraved, lithographed or printed facsimile, or electronically as prescribed by regulation.

1995, c. 51, s. 12; 2005, c. 34, s. 49.

71. The prosecutor is not required to prove the quality or the signature of the following persons, unless the defendant contests their quality or signature and the judge is of opinion that proof thereof must be established:

(1)  the person who issued the statement of offence in the name of the prosecutor and whose name appears on the statement of offence or offence report;

(2)  the person who certified a copy of the statement of offence or offence report;

(3)  the person who signed an attestation as to the issue, content or non-issue of a certificate, licence, permit or any other authorization required by an Act for the carrying on of an activity;

(3.1)  the person having custody of the record or who signed the writing referred to in article 66.1;

(4)  the person having custody of a register kept under or for the purposes of an Act who signed a certificate containing extracts from the register;

(5)  the person who certified a copy which he is authorized to issue under an Act or which the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act authorized him to issue;

(6)  the clerk or judge who signed a certificate attesting the acquittal or conviction of a defendant, the withdrawal or dismissal of a count or statement of offence, or the stay or suspension of proceedings;

(7)  the clerk who certified a copy of the minutes of a judgment or judicial decision;

(8)  the person who attested receipt of the plea of guilty or of the whole amount of the fine and costs imposed on the defendant;

(9)  the person who, in the context of proceedings under Division II of Chapter VI, issued an attestation or certificate referred to in any of subparagraphs 2 and 5 to 8 of the second paragraph of article 218.4.

1987, c. 96, a. 71; 1995, c. 51, s. 13; 2001, c. 32, s. 94; 2005, c. 27, s. 3; 2015, c. 26, s. 3.

CHAPTER II ARREST

72. A peace officer who has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed an offence may require the person to give him his name and address, if he does not know them, so that a statement of offence may be prepared.

A peace officer who has reasonable grounds to believe that the person has not given him his real name and address may require further information from the person to confirm their accuracy.

1987, c. 96, a. 72.

73. A person may refuse to give his name and address or further information to confirm their accuracy so long as he is not informed of the offence alleged against him.

1987, c. 96, a. 73.

74. A peace officer may arrest without a warrant a person informed of the offence alleged against him who, despite the peace officer’s demand, fails or refuses to give him his name and address or further information to confirm their accuracy.

The person so arrested must be released from custody by the person detaining him once he gives his name and address or once their accuracy is confirmed.

1987, c. 96, a. 74.

75. A peace officer who finds a person committing an offence may arrest him without a warrant if that is the only reasonable means available to him to put an end to the commission of the offence.

The person so arrested must be released from custody by the person detaining him once the latter person has reasonable grounds to believe that detention is no longer necessary to prevent, for the time being, the repetition or continuation of the offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 75.

76. A peace officer may require security from a defendant on whom a statement of offence is being served if he has reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant is about to abscond by leaving the territory of Québec. In no case, however, may he require security from a person under 18 years of age.

The security is equal to the amount of the minimum fine prescribed for the offence described in the statement plus the costs fixed by regulation.

The security is payable in cash or otherwise, as prescribed by regulation.

1987, c. 96, a. 76.

77. Security in a greater amount than that described in article 76 may be required from a defendant 18 years of age or over provided it is fixed, upon the application of a peace officer made before service of the statement of offence on the defendant, by a judge of the judicial district where the proceeding may be instituted.

The judge shall not order the furnishing of security in a greater amount except where the applicant satisfies him that the amount described in article 76 is insufficient to guarantee payment of the fine and costs requested and that, if security in a greater amount is not required, the defendant will elude justice by leaving the territory of Québec.

The security is payable in cash or otherwise, as the judge may determine.

1987, c. 96, a. 77.

78. A peace officer who receives the required amount of security shall give the defendant a receipt attesting the payment of the security.

1987, c. 96, a. 78.

79. A peace officer who has required security may without a warrant arrest a defendant who refuses or neglects to pay it.

A defendant so arrested shall be released from custody by the person detaining him once the amount of the security is paid.

1987, c. 96, a. 79.

80. A judge of the judicial district where proceedings were instituted may, on the application of a defendant who has paid the security required under article 76, review the exigibility of the security and, as the case may be, confirm or change the amount of the security to make it correspond to the exigible amount.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 80.

81. A judge of the Superior Court in the judicial district where proceedings have been instituted may, on the application of a defendant who has paid the amount of the security required under article 77, review the exigibility of the security and, as the case may be, confirm or change the amount or mode of payment thereof.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 81.

82. A peace officer who makes an arrest shall declare his name and quality to the person he is arresting and inform him of the grounds for his arrest.

He shall not use more force than necessary.

1987, c. 96, a. 82.

83. No peace officer may, for the purposes of this chapter, enter any place that is not accessible to the public, except in the cases provided for in articles 84 and 85 and in Chapter II.1.

1987, c. 96, a. 83; 2020, c. 12, s. 19.

84. A peace officer may enter a place that is not accessible to the public if he has reasonable grounds to believe that a person there is committing an offence which may result in danger to human life or health or the safety of persons or property and that arresting him is the only reasonable means available to him to put an end to the commission of the offence.

Before entering the place, the peace officer shall, if possible, depending on whether persons or property need to be protected, give a notice of his presence and of the purpose thereof to a person in the place and state his name and quality.

1987, c. 96, a. 84; 2020, c. 12, s. 20.

85. A peace officer who has reasonable grounds to believe that a person is fleeing from arrest may pursue him into the place where he is taking refuge.

Before entering the place, the peace officer shall give a notice of his presence and of the purpose thereof to a person in the place and state his name and quality, unless he has reasonable grounds to believe that that might allow the person to be arrested to abscond.

1987, c. 96, a. 85; 2020, c. 12, s. 21.

86. A peace officer shall not use more force than necessary to enter a place.

1987, c. 96, a. 86.

87. The powers conferred on peace officers by this chapter and Chapter II.1 and the duties imposed on them are also assigned to persons responsible under any Act for the enforcement of that Act or any other Act.

A person responsible as in the first paragraph

(1)  shall not arrest, pursuant to article 75, a person who is committing an offence except in the case of an offence that may result in danger to human life or health or to the safety of persons or property;

(2)  shall not require security from the defendant pursuant to article 76;

(3)  shall, as soon as possible when making an arrest, except in the case of article 88, commit the person he has arrested to the custody of a peace officer if he cannot release him from custody pursuant to article 74, 75 or 79.

1987, c. 96, a. 87; 2020, c. 12, s. 22.

88. A person under eighteen years of age who is arrested and who cannot be released from custody pursuant to article 74 or 75 shall be committed to the custody of the director of youth protection in the place where the arrest was made; in such a case, the director of youth protection shall comply with the second paragraph of article 48.

1987, c. 96, a. 88.

89. Every arrested person who has not been released from custody must be brought promptly before a judge in the judicial district where he was arrested or where proceedings were instituted and at the latest within twenty-four hours after his arrest. If no judge is available within that time, the person must be brought as soon as possible before a judge in one of those districts.

1987, c. 96, a. 89.

89.1. An arrested person who is required to appear with a view to being released from custody may do so in person or consent to doing so using a technological means considered appropriate and authorized by the judge.

However, in the latter case, the consent of the prosecutor and the arrested person is required where witnesses must testify at the appearance and where the arrested person is unable to appear using a technological means that allows him and the judge to view one another and to communicate at the same time.

The appearance using a technological means must allow the defendant, if represented by a lawyer, to communicate privately with his lawyer.

2020, c. 12, s. 23.

90. The judge before whom a person arrested under article 74 appears may order that person to give his name and address or any information to confirm their accuracy.

If the arrested person complies with the order, the judge shall allow a statement of offence to be served on the person forthwith; if the person fails to comply with the order, the judge may convict him of contempt of court.

1987, c. 96, a. 90.

91. The judge shall give every arrested person appearing before him and on whom a statement of offence has been served the opportunity to plead guilty or not guilty. The person may, however, avail himself of the time specified in the statement to enter a plea.

If the person pleads guilty, the judge shall convict him of the offence and impose a sentence on him according to law. If the person pleads not guilty, the judge shall set a date for the trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 91.

92. The judge before whom an arrested person appears shall release him from custody, unless he is satisfied that the detention of the person is justified under article 74, 75 or 79, in which case he shall order that his detention be continued.

If the judge orders that the detention of the arrested person be continued, he may, on the application of the person or of the prosecutor, adjourn the trial, complying with the time limit prescribed in article 94, and order, by remand warrant, that the arrested person be remanded to custody in a detention centre.

The judge may require, as a condition for release from custody, security in the amount he determines in accordance with article 76 or 77. He shall not order a person under eighteen years of age to furnish security in excess of $500.

1987, c. 96, a. 92; 1990, c. 4, s. 3; 2015, c. 26, s. 4; 2020, c. 12, s. 24.

93. The order for conditional or unconditional release from custody or for continued detention may, upon an application, be reviewed by a judge of the Superior Court in the district where the order was made.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the adverse party.

If the judge orders the detention of a person who has been released from custody, he shall issue a warrant of committal against him.

1987, c. 96, a. 93.

94. The trial of proceedings instituted against a defendant whose detention is continued shall begin without undue delay and not later than the eighth day following his arrest or the order of the Superior Court; otherwise, the defendant must be released from custody unconditionally unless he has caused the trial to be delayed or unless he is detained for some other reason.

1987, c. 96, a. 94.

CHAPTER II.1 WARRANT OF ENTRY

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.1. An arrest in a dwelling house under a warrant for witness, warrant to bring a defendant, warrant of committal or warrant of arrest must be authorized by a warrant or telewarrant of entry issued by a judge.

Such authorization is not required

(1)  if a person is taking refuge in a dwelling house in order to flee from arrest;

(2)  if the person in charge of the premises agrees to allow the person responsible for executing the warrant for witness, warrant to bring a defendant, warrant of committal or warrant of arrest to enter the dwelling house; or

(3)  if the conditions for issuing the warrant set out in article 94.3 are met and urgent circumstances make it difficult to obtain it.

Circumstances are urgent if the person responsible for executing the warrant has reasonable grounds to suspect that it is necessary to enter the dwelling house to prevent imminent bodily harm to or the death of a person.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.2. An application for a warrant or telewarrant of entry may be made by the person who is applying or who applied for the warrant for witness, warrant to bring a defendant, warrant of committal or warrant of arrest or by the person responsible for executing it.

A warrant or telewarrant of entry may be issued at any time in a judicial district by the judge who issues or issued the warrant for witness, warrant to bring a defendant, warrant of committal or warrant of arrest or by any other judge having jurisdiction in that judicial district or in the judicial district in which the dwelling house is located. It shall be signed by the judge who issues it.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.3. No warrant or telewarrant of entry may be issued unless the judge is satisfied that the person making the application has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested is or will be in that dwelling house at the time of the arrest.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.4. The judge shall set out in the warrant or telewarrant of entry any terms and conditions the judge considers appropriate to ensure that entry into the dwelling house is reasonable in the circumstances, including with respect to the hour and period of execution.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.5. Before entering a dwelling house, the person executing the warrant shall give a notice of his presence and of the purpose thereof to a person in the place and state his name and quality.

The judge may authorize the person making the arrest to enter a dwelling house without notice if the judge is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that such notice would expose him or another person to imminent bodily harm or death.

Despite such authorization, the person executing the warrant may not enter the dwelling house without notice unless he has reasonable grounds at the time to suspect that such notice would expose him or another person to imminent bodily harm or death.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.6. A person authorized under a warrant or telewarrant of entry to arrest a person in a dwelling house may not enter under the warrant unless he has reasonable grounds at the time to believe that the person to be arrested is there.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.7. The person executing the warrant or telewarrant of entry must allow the arrested person and, as the case may be, the person in charge of the premises to examine the warrant. If it is not in his possession, he must promptly allow them to examine it.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.8. The warrant or telewarrant of entry must state the name of the person to be arrested, the dwelling house where the person may be arrested and, by name or in general terms, who may enter it to arrest the person. It must be numbered and mention the warrant for witness, warrant to bring a defendant, warrant of committal or warrant of arrest to be executed.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

94.9. Articles 99 to 101.1 apply, with the necessary modifications, to the issue of a warrant or telewarrant of entry.

2020, c. 12, s. 25.

CHAPTER III SEARCH AND SEIZURE

1987, c. 96, c. III; 2020, c. 12, s. 26.

DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING SEARCHES

1987, c. 96, Div. I; 2020, c. 12, s. 27.

95. A search is the exploration of a place with a view to seizing therein an animate or inanimate thing

(1)  which may be used as evidence of the commission of an offence;

(2)  the possession of which constitutes an offence;

(3)  which was obtained, directly or indirectly, by the commission of an offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 95.

96. A search is authorized by a warrant or telewarrant. No search may be made without a warrant or telewarrant except where the person in charge of the premises agrees to the search, or in urgent circumstances.

Circumstances are urgent where the time necessary to obtain a warrant or a telewarrant may result in danger to human life or health or to the safety of persons or property or in the disappearance, destruction or loss of the thing searched for. However, no search without a warrant or telewarrant may be made in a dwelling house except in an emergency where the person making the search has reasonable grounds to believe that the life, health or safety of a person is in danger.

1987, c. 96, a. 96; 2020, c. 12, s. 28.

97. A person who proposes to make a search without a warrant or telewarrant must also have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed and that the thing searched for is located in the place where he proposes to make the search.

1987, c. 96, a. 97.

98. An application for a search warrant or telewarrant may be made by a peace officer or person responsible under an Act for the enforcement of that Act or of some other Act.

1987, c. 96, a. 98.

99. An application for a search warrant is made orally but must be supported by an affidavit.

In the case of a telewarrant, the application and a statement are made by telephone or by any other means of telecommunication.

The statement of the applicant may omit the names of persons who constitute sources of information or facts that may lead to the disclosure of such sources.

1987, c. 96, a. 99; 1990, c. 4, s. 4; 2015, c. 26, s. 5.

100. The judge to whom an application for a search telewarrant is made by telephone or by any other means of telecommunication that does not allow communication in written form shall record the applicant’s statement verbatim either in writing or by mechanical means. The statement is deemed to be made under oath.

If the judge issues the telewarrant,

(1)  he shall complete the original, indicating the number of the telewarrant, the name of the person from whom he received the statement and the place, date and time of issue of the telewarrant, and sign it;

(2)  he shall, where necessary, cause the recording of the statement to be transcribed, certify the conformity of the transcript and indicate the place, date and time of transcription;

(3)  he shall promptly cause to be filed with the clerk of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search is to be made the original of the telewarrant and the record or transcript of the recording.

1987, c. 96, a. 100; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 2015, c. 26, s. 6; I.N. 2021-03-18.

101. The person who applied for a telewarrant by telephone or by any other means of telecommunication that does not allow communication in written form shall prepare a duplicate thereof. He shall indicate thereon the number of the telewarrant, the fact that the telewarrant was issued on the faith of his statement and that his statement was deemed made under oath, the name of the judge who issued it and the place, date and time of its issue, and shall sign it.

1987, c. 96, a. 101; 2015, c. 26, s. 7.

101.1. The judge to whom an application for a search telewarrant is made by a means of telecommunication that allows communication in written form shall promptly cause the statement to be filed with the clerk of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search is to be made and certify the date and time on which it was received. The statement is deemed to be made under oath if the person making it attests that, to the best of the person’s knowledge, the facts alleged are true.

If the judge issues the telewarrant, the judge shall

(1)  complete the original, indicating the number of the telewarrant and the place, date and time of issue of the telewarrant, and sign it;

(2)  send the telewarrant to the applicant; the copy received is deemed to be a duplicate of the telewarrant; and

(3)  promptly have the original of the telewarrant filed with the clerk of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search is to be made.

2015, c. 26, s. 8.

102. A search warrant may be issued at any time by a judge having jurisdiction in the judicial district where the search is to be made or in the district where the offence was reportedly committed. It must be signed by the judge who issues it.

A search telewarrant may be issued at any time by a judge and in a district designated by the chief judge of the Court of Québec.

1987, c. 96, a. 102; 1988, c. 21, s. 66.

103. No search warrant or telewarrant may be issued unless the judge is satisfied that the person applying therefor has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed and that the thing searched for is located in the place where he proposes to make the search.

1987, c. 96, a. 103; 2020, c. 12, s. 29.

104. The search warrant or telewarrant must indicate, by name or in general terms, who is in charge of the search; it must also indicate the place, vehicle or receptacle authorized to be searched and the things searched for therein; the warrant or telewarrant must be numbered and mention the obligation to make a report of the search.

1987, c. 96, a. 104.

105. The search warrant or telewarrant is executory throughout Québec.

1987, c. 96, a. 105.

106. The execution of a search warrant or telewarrant cannot commence more than fifteen days after it is issued nor, without the written authorization of the judge who issued it, before seven a.m. or after eight p.m., or on a holiday.

1987, c. 96, a. 106; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

107. A search may be made by a peace officer, a person responsible under an Act for the enforcement of that Act or another Act or any other person authorized by the judge who issued the warrant or telewarrant.

1987, c. 96, a. 107.

108. A person making a search shall, if there are persons present on the premises where the search is made,

(1)  declare his name and quality to them;

(2)  specify the offence giving rise to the search to the person on whose premises the search is made or, in his absence, the person who declares that he is in charge of them;

(3)  allow that person or the person in charge, as the case may be, to examine the warrant or telewarrant and leave him a copy of it;

(4)  ask that person or the person in charge, as the case may be, to hand over the things searched for.

1987, c. 96, a. 108; 1990, c. 4, s. 5.

109. A person making a search may enter the place wherein he is authorized to search for a thing.

He may seize, in addition to the thing searched for, any thing in plain view described in article 95.

He may also search any person present on the premises where the search is made if he has reasonable grounds to believe that the person has the thing searched for on his person.

If the person must use force in making the search, he shall not use more force than necessary.

1987, c. 96, a. 109.

109.1. A person authorized, in accordance with this division, to search the data contained in an information technology medium or data accessed by that medium may use or cause to be used any computer, equipment or other thing that is on the premises to access such data and to search for, examine, copy or print out such data. The person may seize and remove such a copy or printout.

Division IV of Chapter III applies to such a copy or printout.

The person in charge of the premises being searched must see to it that the authorized person is able to proceed with the required operations provided for in the first paragraph.

2020, c. 12, s. 30.

110. Where a person makes a seizure during a search, he shall record the seizure in minutes containing

(1)  indication of the place where the seizure was made;

(2)  the date and time of the seizure;

(3)  the number of the search warrant or telewarrant or the reasons for which the seizure was made without a warrant or telewarrant;

(4)  a summary description of the thing seized;

(5)  if they are known, the name of the person from whom the thing was seized and the name of the person on whose premises the search was made or, in his absence, the name of the person in charge of them;

(6)  any information by which the person entitled to the thing seized may be identified;

(7)  the name and quality of the seizor.

1987, c. 96, a. 110.

111. The seizor shall remit a duplicate of the minutes to the person from whom the thing was seized or to the person in charge of the premises, as the case may be; if the premises are unoccupied, the seizor shall promptly file a duplicate either at the office of the Municipal Court or of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search warrant was issued or, if the search was made without a warrant, at the office of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search was made.

If the search was made in a judicial district other than the judicial district where the search warrant was issued, the person from whom the thing was seized or the person in charge of the premises may obtain a copy of the minutes at the office of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search was made.

1987, c. 96, a. 111; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 1995, c. 51, s. 15.

112. Where a search is made when no one is on the premises, the person making the search shall affix in a conspicuous place on the premises a notice indicating that a search has been made there.

If a thing was seized, the notice must also indicate in which court office the duplicate of the minutes of seizure will be filed and where to inquire to find out where the thing seized will be detained.

1987, c. 96, a. 112.

113. A person who has executed a search warrant or telewarrant or who, if it was not executed, applied therefor, shall make a written report thereon.

The report must be filed, along with the warrant or the duplicate of the telewarrant and, where a seizure was made, the minutes of seizure, with a judge having jurisdiction to issue a search warrant in the judicial district where the warrant was issued or where the original of the telewarrant was filed, as the case may be.

The report must be filed within fifteen days of the expiry of the period for executing the warrant unless the judge grants an extension for the filing.

1987, c. 96, a. 113.

114. A person who has made a search without a warrant or telewarrant shall promptly report thereon to a judge having jurisdiction to issue a search warrant in the judicial district where the search was made.

He shall then file with the judge an affidavit setting forth his grounds for deciding to make a search in that place, the thing he was searching for and, where such is the case, the urgent circumstances that prevented him from applying for a warrant or telewarrant or the name of the person who consented to the search and the manner in which that person’s consent was given.

Where a thing was seized, the seizor shall also file with the judge the minutes of seizure either at the time he reports on the search or within fifteen days of the seizure, unless the judge grants an extension.

1987, c. 96, a. 114; 2020, c. 12, s. 31.

DIVISION II SEARCH IN RESPECT OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

115. A person who makes a search in respect of confidential information held by a person bound by law to professional secrecy, by a priest or by any other minister of religion shall give him, before beginning to search for such information, a reasonable opportunity to object to the examination of anything that may lead to the disclosure of such information, unless the person entitled to the confidentiality of the information consents to the search.

1987, c. 96, a. 115.

116. If an objection is raised, the person making the search shall, in the presence of the objector and without examining or copying the thing, place it in a package, seal and identify the package, and deliver it promptly to the clerk of the Court of Québec in the judicial district where the search was made.

1987, c. 96, a. 116; 1988, c. 21, s. 66.

117. The objector or the person entitled to the confidentiality of the information may, with the leave of a judge of the Court of Québec, examine the thing seized. The objector may also copy the thing seized upon payment of the costs fixed by regulation.

The examination or copy shall be carried out in the presence of the judge or, on his order, in the presence of the clerk of the court. The judge shall take whatever measures are required to ensure the confidentiality of the information.

1987, c. 96, a. 117; 1988, c. 21, s. 66.

118. On the application of the objector or of the person entitled to the confidentiality of the information, a judge of the court where the thing seized was filed or, in the absence of such a judge, a judge of the Court of Québec shall rule on the confidentiality of the information.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served within fifteen days of the return of the thing seized to the clerk on the seizor and the prosecutor as well as on any other person entitled to make such an application. Failing prior notice within the time prescribed, the thing seized must be returned to the seizor or to the prosecutor, depending on whether or not proceedings have been instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 118; 1988, c. 21, s. 66.

119. The judge shall hear the application in camera. He may summon witnesses, examine the thing seized and allow the attorneys to examine it. He shall, however, take whatever measures are required to ensure the confidentiality of the information.

1987, c. 96, a. 119.

120. If the judge declares all the information that the thing may disclose to be confidential, he shall order that the thing be returned to the objector; in the opposite case, he shall order it to be returned to the seizor or the prosecutor, depending on whether or not proceedings have been instituted.

If the judge declares only part of the information to be confidential, he may order that the thing seized be returned to the prosecutor or the seizor, as the case may be, provided that the confidential information be removed and returned to the objector.

1987, c. 96, a. 120.

121. The decision on the confidentiality of information is executory only after the expiry of fifteen days, unless the parties waive that time.

1987, c. 96, a. 121.

DIVISION III EXAMINATION OF THINGS SEIZED AND OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO SEARCH

122. Every person who has an interest in a thing seized may, with leave of a judge having jurisdiction to issue a search warrant in the judicial district where the thing is detained, examine the thing and, upon payment of the costs prescribed by regulation, obtain a copy thereof.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the custodian of the thing seized and on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 122.

123. After a search has been made, any person may, unless an order restricting access thereto has been made, examine the following documents:

(1)  the search warrant and the written statement;

(2)  the original and the duplicate of the search telewarrant and the record or transcript of the oral statement;

(3)  the statement setting forth the reasons for which a search was made without a warrant or telewarrant;

(4)  the report of execution of the warrant or telewarrant;

(5)  the minutes of seizure.

1987, c. 96, a. 123.

DIVISION III.1 ORDER PROHIBITING OR RESTRICTING ACCESS TO CERTAIN INFORMATION OR DOCUMENTS OR PROHIBITING THEIR COMMUNICATION

2020, c. 12, s. 32.

124. On the application of the prosecutor or of a person who proposes to execute or has executed a warrant, a telewarrant, an order provided for in article 141.5 or 141.6 or any other judicial authorization, the judge may make an order, to the extent that it is necessary to do so, to prohibit access to or the communication of information or documents relating to the warrant, telewarrant, order or other judicial authorization or those relating to an application made under this paragraph. Such an order is made where the judge considers that such access or communication would be prejudicial to the ends of justice or where the information or documents could be used for unlawful ends and where the risk outweighs the importance of access to the information, in particular in the following cases:

(1)  the confidentiality of the identity of an informant would be compromised;

(2)  the information or document could interfere with an investigation in progress relating to the commission of an offence;

(3)  the information or document could endanger persons who use secret intelligence-gathering techniques and would compromise subsequent investigations in which such techniques would be used; or

(4)  the information or document could cause prejudice to an innocent third party.

The judge shall make the order to prohibit access to or the communication of information or documents under the first paragraph, subject to any terms and conditions the judge considers appropriate in the circumstances, in particular with respect to the duration of the prohibition, the partial communication of information or a document, deletion of certain information or the occurrence of a condition. The prohibition regarding access to or communication of information or a document referred to in subparagraph 2 of the first paragraph expires not later than the time the information or document is submitted as evidence in proceedings.

Where an order to prohibit access or communication is made, all the information or documents covered by the order, including the information or documents relating to the application made under the first paragraph, are sealed, subject to any terms and conditions set out in the order. The sealed documents shall be kept in the custody of the court in a place the public cannot access or any other place the judge authorizes. They shall not be disposed of except in accordance with the terms and conditions specified by the judge in the order or as varied under the fourth paragraph.

An application to terminate an order or vary any of its terms or conditions may be made to the judge who made it or to a judge of the court that may be seized of the proceedings resulting from the investigation in the course of which the warrant, the telewarrant, the order provided for in article 141.5 or 141.6 or the other judicial authorization was issued.

1987, c. 96, a. 124; 2020, c. 12, s. 32.

125. Where a document relating to a warrant, a telewarrant, an order provided for in article 141.5 or 141.6 or any other judicial authorization contains information the disclosure of which may result in danger to human life or safety, the judge may, on an application, make an order to fix conditions before allowing examination of such information or to temporarily or permanently prohibit examination of the information.

Where the application is made by a person other than the prosecutor or the person who executed the warrant, telewarrant, order or other judicial authorization, prior notice of not less than one clear day must be served on that person and, where applicable, on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 125; 2020, c. 12, s. 32.

126. On the application of a person who has an interest in a document relating to a warrant, a telewarrant, an order provided for in article 141.5 or 141.6 or any other judicial authorization, the judge may, having regard in particular to the interests of justice and the right to privacy, make an order to fix conditions before allowing examination of such a document or part of it or to temporarily prohibit access to it until not later than the time the document is submitted as evidence in proceedings.

The order may not, however, affect the right of the person who made the search, the prosecutor, the person on whose premises the search was made, the person from whom a thing was seized or the defendant to have access to and examine the document.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the person who made the search and, where applicable, on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 126; 2020, c. 12, s. 32.

127. Applications referred to in this division shall be made to the judge who issued the warrant, the telewarrant, the order provided for in article 141.5 or 141.6 or the other judicial authorization or to a judge of the court that may be seized of the proceedings resulting from the investigation in the course of which the warrant, telewarrant, order or other judicial authorization was issued. Where the application concerns only the minutes of seizure, it may also be made to a judge having jurisdiction to issue a search warrant in the judicial district where the duplicate was filed.

1987, c. 96, a. 127; 2020, c. 12, s. 32.

128. Where a search was made without a warrant or telewarrant, articles 124 to 127 apply, with the necessary modifications, to the documents referred to in paragraphs 3 and 5 of article 123. The applications referred to in those articles may also be made to a judge of the judicial district where the affidavit relating to the search without a warrant or telewarrant was filed.

1987, c. 96, a. 128; 2020, c. 12, s. 32.

128.1. Any decision respecting access to information or a document rendered under articles 124 to 126 and 128 may be reviewed by a judge of the Superior Court in the judicial district where it was rendered.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of an application for review must be served on the parties in first instance.

2020, c. 12, s. 32.

DIVISION IV CUSTODY, DETENTION AND DISPOSITION OF THINGS SEIZED

129. The seizor shall have custody of the thing seized; where it is submitted in evidence, the clerk shall become the custodian thereof.

The custodian may detain the thing seized or see to it that it is detained in such a manner as to ensure its preservation.

1987, c. 96, a. 129.

130. Where the thing seized is perishable or likely to depreciate rapidly, the judge may, on the application of the custodian, authorize the sale of the thing.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the person from whom the thing was seized and on the persons who claim to have a right in the thing. However, the judge may exempt the custodian from service if deterioration of the thing seized is imminent.

The sale shall be made on the conditions fixed by the judge. The proceeds of sale shall be deposited with the Bureau général de dépôts pour le Québec.

1987, c. 96, a. 130; 2016, c. 7, s. 183.

131. Where the thing seized presents a serious danger to human health or safety or to the safety of property, a judge may, on the application of the custodian, authorize the destruction of the thing.

Prior notice of not less than one clear day of the application must be served on the person from whom the thing was seized and on the persons who claim to have a right in the thing.

Where the danger is imminent, the custodian may destroy the thing without authorization from a judge, but he shall promptly report the destruction to a judge and notify it to the person from whom the thing was seized and, if known, the persons who may have had rights therein.

1987, c. 96, a. 131.

132. The seizor has no right to detain the thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof for a period of more than ninety days from the date of seizure unless proceedings have been instituted or except in the cases provided for in articles 133 to 137.

1987, c. 96, a. 132.

133. The seizor may, before the expiry of the ninety-day period, apply to a judge for further detention for a period the judge determines, but that may not exceed one year following the date of seizure.

To obtain any additional further detention period, the seizor must apply therefor before the expiry of the first such period to a judge of the Superior Court in the judicial district where the first order for further detention was made. In such a case, the judge shall fix the conditions and specify the period of detention.

Where the seizor applies for a further detention period, he must prove that further detention is necessary, having regard to the complexity of the evidence or to the difficulty of examining the things seized.

Prior notice of an application for further detention must be served on the person from whom the thing was seized and on the persons who claim to have a right in the thing seized or in the proceeds of the sale thereof.

1987, c. 96, a. 133; 2020, c. 12, s. 33.

134. The thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof must be returned as soon as possible

(1)  once the seizor has been informed that no proceedings will be instituted in respect of the thing or the proceeds or that the thing will not be submitted in evidence;

(2)  at the expiry of the period during which the seizor is entitled to detain the thing or the proceeds; or,

(3)  where an order to return the thing or the proceeds has become executory.

1987, c. 96, a. 134.

135. Where a thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof could be returned but for a dispute as to the possession thereof, the judge may, on the application of the seizor, the prosecutor, the person from whom the thing was seized or any person who claims to have a right therein, order the thing or the proceeds detained on the conditions he fixes or, if the existence of the dispute is not proved, designate the person to whom the thing or the proceeds shall be returned.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the persons entitled to make such an application.

1987, c. 96, a. 135.

136. Where a thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof could be returned but for being required in other proceedings, the prosecutor proposing to institute the other proceedings, the seizor or the prosecutor in the initial proceedings may apply to a judge to order detention of the thing or proceeds and to entrust him with the custody thereof. The judge shall in such a case fix the conditions and specify the period of detention.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the person from whom the thing was seized and on the other persons entitled to make such an application.

1987, c. 96, a. 136.

137. Where a thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof cannot be returned as a result of unlawful possession to the person from whom the thing was seized or to a person who claims to have a right therein, the judge shall, on the application of the seizor or the prosecutor, order the forfeiture of the thing or the proceeds; if unlawful possession is not proved, the judge shall designate the person to whom the thing or the proceeds may be returned.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the person from whom the thing was seized and on the other person entitled to make such an application. Such prior notice may, where applicable, be given with the statement of offence, specifying that the application for forfeiture is to be made at the time of the judgment.

Unless otherwise specially provided, the thing seized belongs to the State on being forfeited and shall be delivered to the Minister of Revenue; if it is sold before the order for forfeiture, the proceeds of the sale shall be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

1987, c. 96, a. 137; 1995, c. 51, s. 16; 1999, c. 40, s. 57; 2005, c. 44, s. 54.

138. On the application of a person who claims to have a right in the thing seized, a judge shall order the thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof to be handed over to the person if he is satisfied that the person is entitled thereto, that the return thereof will not hinder the course of justice and that detention or forfeiture thereof is not required under article 135, 136 or 137.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the seizor, the prosecutor, the defendant and the person from whom the thing was seized if he does not make such an application.

1987, c. 96, a. 138.

139. Where a thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof must be returned, the thing or proceeds shall be returned to the person from whom the thing was seized or to any other person who is entitled thereto.

Where the person to whom the thing or the proceeds of the sale thereof must be returned is unknown or untraceable, a judge may order, on the application of the seizor or the prosecutor, that it be transferred to the Minister of Revenue or the Minister of Finance, according to whether it is the thing or the proceeds of the sale thereof that must be so transferred, and that a statement describing the property and indicating, where applicable, the name and last known address of the interested party, be sent to the Minister of Revenue.

1987, c. 96, a. 139; 1997, c. 80, s. 55; 2005, c. 44, s. 54.

140. An order for the return or forfeiture of a thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof is executory only on the expiry of 30 days, unless the parties waive that time.

1987, c. 96, a. 140.

141. Any judge having jurisdiction to issue a search warrant in the judicial district where the thing seized is detained or in that where the thing was detained before being sold has jurisdiction to exercise the powers conferred on a judge by this division.

Where a defendant has transmitted or is deemed to have transmitted a plea of guilty without indicating his intention to contest the penalty imposed on him, or is deemed to have transmitted a plea of not guilty, a judge having jurisdiction in the judicial district referred to in the second paragraph of article 187 also has jurisdiction to decide an application under article 137.

Where the thing seized has been submitted in evidence but no judgment has been rendered, the judge who is to render judgment on the proceedings has jurisdiction to order the return of the thing.

1987, c. 96, a. 141; 1995, c. 51, s. 17.

DIVISION V GENERAL WARRANT

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.1. A judge may, on an application following an affidavit by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act, issue a general warrant or telewarrant authorizing the person to use any investigative device, technique or procedure or do anything described by the judge that would, if not so authorized, constitute an unreasonable search or seizure in respect of a person or a person’s property.

The judge may not, however, authorize the interception of a private communication, as defined in section 183 of the Criminal Code (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46). Nor may the judge authorize the observation by means of a television camera or other similar electronic device of any person who is engaged in an activity in circumstances in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

The application for a mandate shall be made in writing and must be supported by an affidavit. An application for a telewarrant may also be made by telephone or by another means of telecommunication.

The judge may issue the general warrant or telewarrant if the judge is satisfied

(1)  that there are reasonable grounds to believe that an offence against an Act has been or will be committed and that information concerning the offence will be obtained through the use of the investigative device, technique or procedure or the doing of the thing;

(2)  that it is in the best interests of the administration of justice to issue the authorization; and

(3)  that there is no provision in this Code or in another Act that would provide for a warrant, authorization or order permitting the device, technique or procedure to be used or the thing to be done.

Nothing in this article operates to permit interference with the physical integrity of any person.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.2. The general warrant or telewarrant shall set out such terms and conditions as the judge considers appropriate, in the circumstances, in particular concerning the execution of the authorization, to ensure that the search or seizure is reasonable and to protect lawyers’ and notaries’ professional secrecy.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.3. A judge who issues a general warrant or telewarrant authorizing a person to enter and search a place covertly must require that notice of the entry and search be given after its execution within the time the judge considers appropriate in the circumstances.

Where that judge or another judge having jurisdiction to issue such a warrant is satisfied, on a written application made on the basis of an affidavit, that the interests of justice warrant the issue of such a warrant, the judge may grant an extension of the period referred to in the first paragraph, up to a maximum of three years. The extension may be granted any time before expiry of the three-year period.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.4. Articles 99 to 101.1 apply, with the necessary modifications, to the issue of the general warrant or telewarrant.

Divisions III and IV apply to a general warrant or telewarrant that authorizes a search.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

DIVISION VI COMMUNICATION ORDERS ISSUED TO A THIRD PARTY

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.5. A judge may, on an application made on the basis of an affidavit by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act, order a person, other than the person under investigation,

(1)  to communicate information in his possession or control when he receives the order, or a copy, certified by affidavit, of a document in his possession or control at that time; or

(2)  to prepare a document based on information or documents in his possession or control when he receives the order and communicate it.

The order shall specify the place, form and time limit for communicating the documents or information as well as the name of the peace officer or the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act to whom they must be communicated.

Before making an order, the judge must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that

(1)  an offence against an Act has been or will be committed;

(2)  the information or documents will afford evidence respecting the commission of the offence; and

(3)  the person concerned has possession or control of the information or documents.

The order may contain any terms and conditions the judge considers appropriate, in particular terms and conditions to protect lawyers’ and notaries’ professional secrecy.

Where the judge who makes the order or any other judge having jurisdiction to make such an order is satisfied, on an application made on the basis of an affidavit submitted by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act in support of the application, that the interests of justice warrant the granting of the application, the judge may vary or revoke the order or set a new time limit.

Any copy of a document communicated under this article, provided it is certified by affidavit, is admissible in evidence in any proceeding and has the same probative force as the original document would have had if it had been filed as evidence in the usual manner.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.6. A judge may, on an application made on the basis of an affidavit by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act, order a financial institution within the meaning of section 2 of the Bank Act (S.C. 1991, c. 46) or a person or entity referred to in section 5 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (S.C. 2000, c. 17), unless that financial institution, person or entity is under investigation, to prepare and communicate a document setting out the following information that is in their possession or control when they receive the order:

(1)  the account number of the person named in the order or the name of the person whose account number is specified in the order;

(2)  the type of account;

(3)  the status of the account; and

(4)  the date on which it was opened or closed.

For the purpose of confirming the identity of the person who is named or whose account number is specified in the order, the order may also require the financial institution, person or entity to prepare and communicate a document setting out the following information that is in their possession or control when they receive the order:

(1)  the date of birth of the person who is named or whose account number is specified in the order;

(2)  that person’s address at the time the order is made; and

(3)  all previous addresses of that person.

The order shall specify the place, form and time limit for communicating the documents or information as well as the name of the peace officer or the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act to whom they must be communicated.

Before making an order, the judge must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to suspect

(1)  that an offence against an Act has been or will be committed;

(2)  that the information requested will be useful for the investigation relating to the offence; and

(3)  that the person who is the subject of the order has possession or control of the information.

The order may contain any terms and conditions the judge considers appropriate, in particular terms and conditions to protect lawyers’ and notaries’ professional secrecy.

Where the judge who makes the order or any other judge having jurisdiction to make such an order is satisfied, on an application made on the basis of an affidavit submitted by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act in support of the application, that the interests of justice warrant the granting of the application, the judge may vary or revoke the order or set a new time limit.

Any copy of a document communicated under this section, provided it is certified by affidavit, is admissible in evidence in any proceeding and has the same probative force as the original document would have had if it had been filed in evidence in the usual manner.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.7. A document prepared for communication purposes under article 141.5 or 141.6 is deemed to be an original for the purposes of the Canada Evidence Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-5).

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.8. No person is excused from complying with an order made under article 141.5 or 141.6 on the ground that information or documents the person is required to communicate or prepare may tend to incriminate the person or subject the person to a proceeding or penalty. However, no information or document that a natural person is required to communicate or prepare may be used or received in evidence against him in a proceeding that is subsequently instituted against him, except in a prosecution for perjury, the giving of contradictory testimony or the fabrication of evidence.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.9. A judge may, on an application made on the basis of an affidavit by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act, make an order prohibiting any person from disclosing the existence or part or all of the content of an order made under article 141.5 or 141.6, for the period specified in the order.

Before making the order, the judge must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that disclosure of the information in the specified period could interfere with the investigation relating to the offence that is the subject of the order made under article 141.5 or 141.6.

The peace officer, the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act, or the person, financial institution or entity mentioned in the order made under the first paragraph may apply in writing to the judge who made the order, or to a judge having jurisdiction to make such an order, to vary or revoke the order.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.10. Before being required to communicate information or a certified copy or to prepare and communicate a document under an order made under article 141.5 or 141.6, the person, financial institution or entity mentioned in the order may apply in writing to the judge who made the order, or to a judge having jurisdiction to make such an order, to vary or revoke the order.

The application may be made within 30 days after the day on which the order is made, provided prior notice of not less than three clear days of the intention to do so is given to a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act named in the order. The person, financial institution or entity concerned is not required to communicate the information or the certified copy or prepare and communicate the document under the order until the judge has ruled on the application.

A judge to whom an application is made under this section may vary or revoke the order if satisfied

(1)  that it is unreasonable in the circumstances to require the person, financial institution or entity to communicate the information or the certified copy or to prepare and communicate the document under the order; or

(2)  that such communication would disclose information that is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

141.11. Applications made to a judge under article 141.5, 141.6 or 141.9 are made in the sole presence of the applicant. Those applications may be made at a distance using technological means.

2020, c. 12, s. 34; 2020, c. 29, s. 51.

141.12. Article 122 and Division IV of Chapter III do not apply to information or documents communicated under an order provided for in article 141.5 or 141.6.

2020, c. 12, s. 34.

CHAPTER IV INSTITUTION OF PROCEEDINGS

DIVISION I LOCATION OF THE PROSECUTION

142. Penal proceedings shall be instituted, as the prosecutor may elect, in the judicial district where the defendant

(1)  committed the offence according to the statement of offence;

(2)  has his residence or has its head office or one of its places of business;

(3)  is in detention, where such is the case.

Penal proceedings may also be instituted in any other judicial district, with the consent of the defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 142; 1992, c. 61, s. 7.

143. An offence committed within a distance of two kilometres from the boundary of two or more judicial districts, upon any water crossed by such a boundary, or in a vehicle in the course of a journey that crosses several districts, or an offence begun in one judicial district and ended in another, is deemed to have been committed in one or the other of those districts.

1987, c. 96, a. 143.

DIVISION II STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

§ 1 . — General provisions

144. Penal proceedings shall be instituted by way of a statement of offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 144.

145. The form, including the electronically-generated form, of a statement of offence shall be prescribed by regulation.

1987, c. 96, a. 145; 1995, c. 51, s. 18.

146. A statement of offence is deemed to have been made under oath and shall contain the following particulars:

(1)  the name and address of the prosecutor;

(2)  the name and address of the defendant or, in the case of a parking violation, the description and registration of the vehicle;

(3)  the judicial district where the proceedings are instituted;

(4)  the date of service of the statement if it is delivered at the time of the commission of the offence; if it is delivered after the commission of the offence, the date may be added on the statement by the peace officer, the bailiff or the person who has effected the service; if service is made by mail, the statement shall refer to the document which indicates the date; if the statement is drawn up electronically or digitized, the date of service shall also be indicated in a document electronically appended to the document;

(4.1)  the date of interruption of prescription if it is different from the date of service of the statement;

(5)  the description of the offence;

(6)  the obligation of the defendant to enter a plea of not guilty or of guilty;

(7)  the defendant’s right to make a preliminary application;

(8)  the minimum statutory sentence for a first offence under the legislative provision infringed by the defendant;

(9)  an indication of where to send the plea and, where such is the case, the amount of the fine, the costs and the contribution provided for in article 8.1, and the time limit for doing so.

In addition to the particulars set out in the first paragraph, if a statement of offence is served in accordance with article 157.2 and all the conditions set out in subparagraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the second paragraph of article 163 are met, the statement of offence must include a warning to the defendant. The warning shall indicate that if the defendant fails to enter a plea or to pay the whole or any part of the fine and costs requested, within 30 days of service of the statement or, if applicable, to send a declaration referred to in section 592.1 or 592.1.1 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) within the time prescribed by section 592.1 of that Code, the defendant will be deemed not to contest the proceedings and may be convicted of the alleged offence in absence and without having an opportunity to be heard.

1987, c. 96, a. 146; 1992, c. 61, s. 8; 1995, c. 51, s. 19; 2002, c. 78, s. 2; 2005, c. 27, s. 4; 2015, c. 26, s. 9.

147. The statement of offence shall indicate, where such is the case, the name and quality of the person who, with the authorization of the prosecutor, issued the statement.

An authorization to issue a statement which may be given by the prosecutor shall be given generally or specially and in writing. In addition, it shall indicate the offences or classes of offences for which it is given.

Subject to the specific provisions in Division II of Chapter VI, the person who issues the statement, just as the prosecutor himself, need not personally have witnessed the offence, but must have reasonable grounds to believe that the offence was committed by the defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 147; 1992, c. 61, s. 9; 2005, c. 27, s. 5.

148. The statement of offence shall also contain, in a separate section, a request for sentence indicating

(1)  the minimum sentence requested by the prosecutor;

(2)  where the sentence requested is a fine, the amount of the costs fixed by regulation payable by the defendant if he transmits a plea of guilty;

(2.1)  where applicable, the amount of the contribution provided for in article 8.1;

(2.2)  where the sentence requested is a fine, the total amount of the fine, the costs and, where applicable, the contribution requested;

(3)  a summary statement of the reasons for requesting, where such is the case, a greater sentence than the minimum sentence, particularly in the case of a second or subsequent conviction;

(4)  the defendant’s right, if he enters a plea of guilty, to contest the sentence requested if it is greater than the minimum sentence.

However, in the case referred to in the second paragraph of article 146, the sentence imposed must be the minimum fine prescribed by law.

The judge shall not examine the request for sentence unless he has convicted the defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 148; 2002, c. 78, s. 3; 2005, c. 27, s. 6.

149. The indication of the minimum sentence and of the sentence requested must take into account, where applicable, the rules prescribed in Division II of Chapter VII.

1987, c. 96, a. 149.

§ 2 . — Description of the offence

150. The statement of offence may include several offences but each must be described in a separate count.

1987, c. 96, a. 150.

151. An offence may be described by using the terms of the legislative provision creating the offence or similar terms; the description of the offence may be completed by a reference to the provision. However, where the reference is not in accordance with the description, the description determines the nature of the offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 151.

152. Each count must be sufficiently detailed as to the offence and the circumstances in which it was committed to allow the defendant to know what he is accused of and to obtain a full and complete defence.

1987, c. 96, a. 152.

153. A count is not invalidated by the sole fact that it does not precisely designate a person, place or thing or that it omits certain details, such as the name of the person injured, the name of the owner of a thing or the means used to commit the offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 153.

154. A count is not considered to include more than one offence by the sole fact that it sets forth different means of committing an offence or lists different things that are the subject of an offence, or both.

1987, c. 96, a. 154; 1999, c. 40, s. 57.

155. Where an offence has continued for more than one day, it shall be counted as a number of offences equal to the number of days or parts of a day during which the offence has continued and the offences may be described in a single count.

1987, c. 96, a. 155.

DIVISION III SERVICE OF STATEMENT OF OFFENCE

156. Every penal proceeding shall commence with service of a statement of offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 156.

157. Service of a statement of offence may be made at the time of the commission of an offence. A duplicate of the statement shall in such a case be delivered to the defendant by the prosecutor or the person authorized to issue a statement on his behalf.

Service of the statement may also be made after the commission of the offence, in accordance with Division V of Chapter I.

1987, c. 96, a. 157.

157.1. Service of a statement of offence may also be made by ordinary mail after the commission of the offence.

In such case, service is deemed completed if the defendant transmits, in respect of the statement of offence, a plea, the whole amount of the fine and costs requested or part thereof or a preliminary application. Moreover, service is deemed to have been made on the day the plea, amount or application is received by the prosecutor.

The attestation of service may be made by producing an extract from the record indicating the date of receipt of the plea, amount or application, certified by the person having custody of the record.

1995, c. 51, s. 20.

157.2. A statement of offence that includes the warning referred to in the second paragraph of article 146 must be served

(1)  at the time of the commission of the offence, personally on the defendant or in accordance with article 158 or 158.1, as applicable;

(2)  on the defendant, in accordance with article 20, 21, 22 or 23, within 60 days after the date the offence was committed in the case of an offence evidenced by a photograph taken by a photo radar device or a red light camera system;

(3)  on the defendant liable for paying the toll and related fees and interest under paragraph 5 of section 13 of the Act respecting transport infrastructure partnerships (chapter P-9.001), in accordance with article 20, 21, 22 or 23, within 60 days after the date the offence under section 417.2 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) was committed, if the offence is evidenced by a photograph taken by a camera described in section 595.1 of that Code; or

(4)  on the defendant liable for paying the toll and related fees and interest under paragraph 1, 3 or 6 of section 13 of the Act respecting transport infrastructure partnerships, in accordance with article 20, 21, 22 or 23, within one year after the date the offence under section 417.2 of the Highway Safety Code was committed, if the offence is evidenced by a photograph taken by a camera described in section 595.1 of that Code.

2005, c. 27, s. 7; 2015, c. 26, s. 10.

158. In the case of a parking violation, service of a statement of offence may be made by affixing a duplicate of the statement in a conspicuous place on the vehicle.

The prosecutor shall promptly send notice of the service to the defendant. The sending of the notice does not operate to vary any time limit fixed by this Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 158; 2005, c. 27, s. 8.

158.1. Where the offence under the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) or the Act respecting owners, operators and drivers of heavy vehicles (chapter P-30.3) is imputable to the owner or operator of a heavy vehicle within the meaning of that Act, the statement of offence may be served, at the time of the commission of the offence, by delivering a duplicate of the statement to any person having custody or control of the vehicle.

The person having served a statement of offence shall promptly send notice thereof to the defendant at his residence or place of business or, in the case of a legal person, to its head office or to one of its places of business or the place of business of one of its agents. The sending of such notice does not operate to vary any time limit fixed by this Code. However, if the defendant alleges that he received no such notice, the judge may either proceed with the trial and render a judgment or order that notice be given to the defendant and adjourn the trial for such purpose.

1995, c. 51, s. 21; 1998, c. 40, s. 153; 2005, c. 39, s. 52.

159. Where the defendant is under 18 years of age, a duplicate of the statement of offence must also be served on his parents, unless they are unknown or cannot be found or except in the case of a parking violation.

1987, c. 96, a. 159.

DIVISION III.1 PROCEEDING RULES ADAPTATION PROGRAM

2020, c. 12, s. 35.

159.1. The purpose of a program to adapt the rules governing proceedings is to offer defendants, within the framework of an education, public awareness, prevention, intervention, reparation or rehabilitation process, an alternative to going to trial or to a continuation of proceedings. Participation in such a program results in, among other things, the withdrawal of one or more counts, in accordance with article 12.

The processes undertaken by a defendant before the defendant’s participation in such a program must also be taken into consideration by the prosecutor.

2020, c. 12, s. 35.

159.2. Before a judgment is rendered, the prosecutor may offer the defendant the possibility of participating in an adaptation program, to the extent that such a program is available.

To make such an offer, the prosecutor must ensure that

(1)  there is sufficient evidence to go to trial or to continue proceedings;

(2)  participation in such a program corresponds to the defendant’s needs;

(3)  the defendant acknowledges the facts resulting in the offence or does not contest them and wishes to participate in the program;

(4)  no rule of law prevents the beginning or continuation of proceedings;

(5)  the defendant has been informed of his right to obtain the assistance of a lawyer;

(6)  the defendant renounces, in writing, invoking the time spent participating in the program for the calculation of the time spent waiting to be tried; and

(7)  the offer is in the interests of justice.

For the purposes of subparagraph 2 of the second paragraph, the defendant’s needs shall be determined in cooperation with the defendant.

2020, c. 12, s. 35.

159.3. If the defendant agrees in writing to participate in an adaptation program during proceedings, the judge shall adjourn them.

2020, c. 12, s. 35.

159.4. The defendant’s participation in an adaptation program ends when he withdraws his consent. The same applies if the prosecutor finds that the defendant is no longer complying with the conditions of the program, in particular if he ceases to cooperate.

In such a case, the judicial proceedings provided for in this Code resume and the information gathered during the defendant’s participation in the program may not be admitted as evidence against him in those proceedings or any other proceeding.

2020, c. 12, s. 35.

159.5. Where the defendant completes the adaptation program in compliance with the conditions determined in the program, the prosecutor withdraws the counts against the defendant, in accordance with article 12, for offences or classes of offences covered by the program.

The same applies where the defendant partially completes the adaptation program, to the prosecutor’s satisfaction, taking into account the circumstances.

2020, c. 12, s. 35.

CHAPTER V PROCEDURE PRIOR TO THE TRIAL

DIVISION I TRANSMISSION OF PLEA

160. The defendant shall transmit a plea of guilty or not guilty within 30 days after service of the statement, to the place indicated therein.

1987, c. 96, a. 160.

161. A defendant who enters a plea of guilty shall transmit with his plea the whole amount of the fine and costs requested; otherwise, he could be liable to pay an additional amount of costs fixed by regulation.

A defendant on whom a greater sentence than the minimum sentence is requested is not required to transmit with his plea of guilty the amount requested if the plea includes an indication of his intention to contest the sentence.

1987, c. 96, a. 161.

162. A defendant who transmits the whole amount of the fine and costs requested without entering a plea is deemed to have transmitted a plea of guilty.

The same applies if, after entering a plea of not guilty, the defendant transmits the whole amount before proceedings begin.

1987, c. 96, s. 162; 2020, c. 12, s. 36.

163. A defendant who transmits neither a plea nor the whole amount of the fine and costs requested is deemed to have transmitted a plea of not guilty.

However, a defendant who does not enter a plea or, if applicable, send the declaration referred to in section 592.1 or 592.1.1 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) and does not pay the whole or any part of the fine and costs requested is deemed not to contest the proceedings if

(1)  the offence comes under Division II of Chapter VI;

(2)  the offence was witnessed personally by one or more peace officers or persons entrusted with the enforcement of an Act;

(3)  the statement of offence was served on the defendant in accordance with any of the paragraphs of article 157.2, as the case may be; and

(4)  the defendant was 18 years of age or over at the time the offence was committed.

The second paragraph does not apply if the defendant is a driver or a renter identified in accordance with section 592.1 or 592.1.1 of the Highway Safety Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 163; 2005, c. 27, s. 9; 2015, c. 26, s. 11.

164. Any partial payment of a fine and costs transmitted with or without a plea is deemed to be security for payment of the fine and costs in case of conviction.

1987, c. 96, a. 164; 2002, c. 78, s. 4.

165. Where the defendant has transmitted or is deemed to have transmitted a plea of guilty without indicating his intention to contest the sentence imposed on him, he is deemed to have been convicted of the offence.

The judgment is deemed to be rendered, and the sentence and the costs requested in the statement are deemed to be imposed in the judicial district in which the proceedings were instituted, at the time of the receipt of the plea or payment of the whole amount of the fine and costs requested.

1987, c. 96, a. 165.

166. The clerk of the court of competent jurisdiction in the judicial district in which the proceedings were instituted shall advise the defendant and the prosecutor of the place, date and time set

(1)  for the pronouncement of conviction and the hearing on the contestation of the sentence where the defendant has transmitted a plea of guilty with an indication of his intention to contest the greater sentence imposed on him;

(2)  for trial of the proceedings where the defendant has transmitted a plea of not guilty.

1987, c. 96, a. 166.

166.1. Notwithstanding articles 165 and 166, the clerk shall give notice to the defendant of the pronouncement of the sentence where the prosecutor requests a term of imprisonment or the issue of a probation order, except where the parties are in the presence of a judge.

1992, c. 61, s. 10.

166.2. The defendant may, at any time before the trial, enter a plea of guilty or pay the whole amount of the fine and costs requested and the amount of additional costs prescribed by regulation in respect of such cases.

1995, c. 51, s. 22.

167. It is incumbent upon the defendant to establish that he has, at the place indicated in the statement and within the prescribed time, transmitted a plea and, where such is the case, the total amount of the fine and costs requested or a plea of guilty including an indication of his intention to contest the greater sentence imposed on him, where any of such facts is contested.

1987, c. 96, a. 167; 2002, c. 78, s. 5.

DIVISION II PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS

168. The fact that a defendant has transmitted a plea of not guilty does not prevent him from making a preliminary application.

1987, c. 96, a. 168.

168.1. No preliminary application may be made by either party in the case of proceedings that the defendant is deemed not to contest under the second paragraph of article 163.

2005, c. 27, s. 10; 2015, c. 26, s. 12.

169. A preliminary application may be made before the date set for the trial to a judge having jurisdiction to try the proceedings in the judicial district where proceedings were instituted or, during trial, to the presiding judge, with his leave. Where a defendant is deemed to have transmitted a plea of not guilty, a preliminary application may also be made by the prosecutor to a judge having jurisdiction to conduct the trial in the judicial district referred to in the second paragraph of article 187.

Prior notice of such an application must be served on the adverse party unless both parties are present before the judge. The notice must be filed in the office of the court of competent jurisdiction in the judicial district where proceedings were instituted.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the application is made by the defendant, the notice transmitted with the plea to the place indicated in the statement of offence has the same value and effect as the service and filing.

1987, c. 96, a. 169; 1995, c. 51, s. 23.

170. The judge to whom a preliminary application is made may, if need be, set a new date for trial of the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 170.

171. The judge to whom a preliminary application is made shall not defer his decision until after the trial except in the case of

(1)  an application contemplated in subparagraph 8 of the first paragraph of article 184;

(2)  any other application contemplated in article 184 made during the trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 171.

172. The costs fixed by regulation may be awarded against a party who makes a preliminary application after being advised of the date set for the trial or after the trial has begun, even if the application is granted, where the judge is satisfied that the application could have been made earlier and that the delay caused unnecessary attendance of witnesses.

1987, c. 96, a. 172.

173. Where the judge dismisses a preliminary application, he may do so with the costs fixed by regulation if he is satisfied that the application is dilatory or clearly unfounded.

1987, c. 96, a. 173.

174. A preliminary application may be made

(1)  to have the record of the case transferred;

(2)  to have the proceedings tried in another judicial district;

(3)  to obtain further details as to the charge;

(4)  to have a count amended;

(5)  to have the statement of offence amended;

(6)  to have the counts contained in a statement of offence tried separately, or to have counts contained in more than one statement tried jointly;

(7)  to allow a defendant to obtain a separate trial;

(8)  to obtain the dismissal of the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 174.

175. On the application of either party, where the judge in charge of the record of the proceedings does not have jurisdiction to try them, he shall order it transferred to a judge having such jurisdiction.

1987, c. 96, a. 175.

176. On the application of either party, the judge may order, in the interests of justice, that the trial be held in another district. The clerk shall thereupon transmit the record to the office of the court of competent jurisdiction in the district designated in the order.

1987, c. 96, a. 176.

177. Where an application for transfer is made by the defendant and is to the effect that the trial be held in the district of his residence, a judge having jurisdiction to try the proceedings in that district shall make the order for such transfer if he is satisfied that the change applied for is in the interests of justice, taking into account the costs of attendance that the witnesses to be summoned by the prosecutor as well as by the defendant will incur as a result of the change.

In addition, prior notice of the application must be served on the clerk of the court of competent jurisdiction in the judicial district where proceedings were instituted. Where the order is made, it shall be served on the said clerk, who shall then transmit the record to the office of the court designated in the order.

1987, c. 96, a. 177.

178. On the application of the defendant, the judge shall order the prosecutor to furnish further details as to the offence and the circumstances in which it was committed if he is satisfied that such details are necessary to allow the defendant to know what he is accused of and to prepare a full and complete defence.

1987, c. 96, a. 178.

179. On the application of the prosecutor, the judge, on such conditions as he determines and if he is satisfied that no injustice will result therefrom, shall allow him to amend a count so as to add a detail or correct an irregularity, and in particular to include in it, in express terms, an essential element of the offence. In no case may the judge allow one defendant to be substituted for another or one offence to be substituted for another.

1987, c. 96, a. 179.

180. On the application of either party, the judge shall, on the conditions he determines, allow a statement of offence to be amended to clarify a detail or correct an irregularity not related to the count.

1987, c. 96, a. 180.

180.1. Where the fine requested from the defendant is greater than the minimum fine prescribed by law, a judge having jurisdiction to conduct the trial in the judicial district where the proceedings have been instituted or in the judicial district referred to in the second paragraph of article 187 may, on an application without prior notice by the prosecutor, order that the statement of offence be amended so as to reduce the fine. The prosecutor shall inform the defendant thereof.

1995, c. 51, s. 24.

181. On the application of the defendant, the judge may order, in the interests of justice, that a separate trial be held on each of several counts in a statement of offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 181.

182. On the application of either party, the judge may order, in the interests of justice, that a joint trial be held on several counts described in separate statements of offence issued against the same defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 182.

183. On the application of one of several defendants jointly accused of having committed the same offence, the judge may order, in the interests of justice, that a separate trial be held for that defendant.

Prior notice of the application must be served on all the parties to the case.

1987, c. 96, a. 183.

184. On the application of the defendant, the judge shall order the dismissal of a count if he is satisfied that

(1)  the defendant has already been acquitted or convicted of the offence described in the statement of offence or been in jeopardy for the offence;

(2)  the offence is prescribed;

(3)  the defendant has immunity from prosecution;

(4)  the person mentioned in the statement of offence as being authorized to issue the statement on behalf of the prosecutor was not so authorized by him;

(5)  the prosecutor does not have the authority to institute the proceedings;

(6)  one count, not excepted under article 155, pertains to more than one offence;

(7)  the count corresponds to no offence created by any Act in force at the time the facts described in the count occurred;

(8)  the provision that creates the offence is either inapplicable constitutionally invalid or inoperative or of no force or effect, including in respect of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Part I of Schedule B to the Canada Act, chapter 11 in the 1982 volume of the Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom) or in respect of the Charter of human rights and freedoms (chapter C-12);

(9)  the defendant has completed the adaptation program, in compliance with the conditions determined in the program, for that count;

(10)  the defendant has partially completed the adaptation program, in compliance with the conditions determined in the program, for that count, and maintaining the proceedings would be unjust in the circumstances.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where an amendment to the statement of offence can correct the irregularity that has been established, the judge, rather than ordering the dismissal of the count, shall, on such conditions as he determines and if he is satisfied that no injustice will result therefrom, allow the prosecutor to make the amendment. In no case may the judge allow one defendant to be substituted for another or one offence to be substituted for another.

Before rendering a decision under subparagraph 10 of the first paragraph, the judge may take into account the defendant’s behaviour while participating in the program.

1987, c. 96, a. 184; 2020, c. 12, s. 37.

Not in force

184.1. The details provided pursuant to article 178 and the amendments made to a count pursuant to article 179 or to a statement of offence pursuant to article 180, 180.1 or 184 may be recorded in the minutes.

1995, c. 51, s. 25; 2001, c. 32, s. 95.

185. Dismissal of a count on grounds described in subparagraphs 4 and 5 of the first paragraph of article 184 does not prevent a prosecutor having the authority to take proceedings from instituting new proceedings for the same offence, provided it is not prescribed.

1987, c. 96, a. 185.

186. No defendant who pleads guilty immediately after obtaining further details or immediately after the count or the statement of offence is amended may be required to pay a greater amount of costs than he would have been required to pay if he had entered such a plea within the time indicated in the statement of offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 186.

DIVISION III PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN CASES

2015, c. 26, s. 13.

186.1. If the interests of justice so require, in particular to ensure that evidence is presented without interruption, the chief judge or chief justice of the court before which proceedings are instituted, or the judge he designates, may, on his own initiative, on a party’s application or following a hearing that he convenes, designate a case management judge for those proceedings.

Before the trial, the case management judge exercises the jurisdiction of a trial judge and may, in particular, in that capacity,

(1)  assist the parties in identifying the witnesses to be heard;

(2)  encourage the parties to make admissions and reach agreements;

(3)  establish schedules and impose deadlines;

(4)  hear pleas of guilty and impose sentences;

(5)  assist the parties in identifying the questions to be ruled on during the trial;

(6)  encourage the parties to consider any other matters that would promote a fair and efficient trial; and

(7)  subject to article 186.3, rule on any issues that can be decided at that stage, including those related to the disclosure and admissibility of evidence, expert witnesses, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Part I of Schedule B to the Canada Act, chapter 11 in the 1982 volume of the Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom) or the Charter of human rights and freedoms (chapter C-12).

The case management judge also exercises that jurisdiction to rule on any matter referred to him by the trial judge.

2015, c. 26, s. 13.

186.2. The case management judge may try a case even if he has, in his capacity as case management judge, rendered a decision relating to that case.

2015, c. 26, s. 13.

186.3. If the interests of justice so require, in particular to ensure consistent decisions, the chief judge or chief justice of the court before which proceedings are instituted, or the judge he designates, may, on his own initiative, on a party’s application or following a hearing that he convenes, order that a joint hearing be held to rule on a question referred to in subparagraph 7 of the second paragraph of article 186.1 that is raised or likely to be raised in more than one proceeding.

A question may relate to proceedings instituted under various Acts and concern more than one defendant or plaintiff.

An order made under the first paragraph must specify the proceedings in which the question must be ruled on and the parties that are to be convened, designate the judge who is to rule on the question and, if the proceedings concerned are instituted in different judicial districts, determine the district in which the hearing is to be held.

The judge so designated exercises the jurisdiction of a trial judge with regard to the proceedings specified in the order.

2015, c. 26, s. 13.

186.4. Unless it would not serve the interests of justice because, among other considerations, new evidence is presented, a trial judge is bound by the decisions rendered under this division. Those decisions are deemed to have been rendered at trial.

2015, c. 26, s. 13.

CHAPTER VI TRIAL

DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS

2005, c. 27, s. 11.

187. Where the defendant has transmitted a plea of not guilty, the proceedings shall be tried, subject to article 175, 176 or 177, by a judge of the judicial district where they were instituted.

Where the defendant is deemed to have transmitted a plea of not guilty, the proceedings may in addition be tried and judgment rendered

(1)  by a judge of the judicial district where the place to which the plea and, as the case may be, the amount of the fine and costs are to be sent is situated; or

(2)  by a judge of any other judicial district, if the chief judge, the senior associate chief judge or a coordinating judge is of the opinion that such a measure is in the interests of justice, particularly taking into account every person’s right to be tried within a reasonable time.

In the cases described in the second paragraph, the prosecutor may indicate that the proceedings must be tried by a judge of the judicial district where they were instituted.

The proceedings tried and judgment rendered in another judicial district, in accordance with the second paragraph, are deemed to have been tried and rendered in the judicial district where the proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 187; 2017, c. 15, s. 1.

188. Where a defendant on whom a statement of offence was duly served is deemed to have transmitted a plea of not guilty, the proceedings shall be tried and judgment rendered even in the absence of the defendant. In such a case, a witness may, should the prosecutor so choose, make his deposition at a distance using any technological means that allows the witness to be identified, heard and seen live.

Where, in addition, the prosecutor fails to attend the trial, the judge may either try the proceedings in the absence of the parties if the evidence is in the record and render judgment by default, or adjourn the trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 188; 2020, c. 12, s. 38.

188.1. In the context of proceedings under article 188, the prosecutor may file an expert’s report, along with a document detailing the expert’s qualifications, without notice or other formality. The expert’s report stands in lieu of his testimony.

2020, c. 12, s. 39.

189. Where the defendant fails to attend the trial although he was duly convened, but the prosecutor is present, the judge may, on proof that the defendant was convened, either adjourn the trial or, on the application of the prosecutor, allow the proceedings to be tried and judgment to be rendered by default.

1987, c. 96, a. 189.

190. Where the prosecutor fails to attend the trial although he was duly convened, but the defendant is present, the judge may, on proof that he was convened, either adjourn the trial or dismiss the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 190.

191. Where both the defendant and the prosecutor fail to attend the trial although they were duly convened, the judge may, on proof that they were convened, either try the proceedings in the absence of the parties if the evidence is in the record and render judgment by default, or adjourn the trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 191.

Not in force

191.1. Where the defendant or both parties are absent, the clerk may transmit to the judge a proceeding received from the prosecutor or file any other type of document in the record of the court.

1995, c. 51, s. 26; 2001, c. 32, s. 96.

192. The prosecutor and the defendant may act personally or through an attorney. A legal person may act through an attorney or through its directors or officers.

For the purposes of this article, the president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer and secretary of a legal person, and any other person holding a similar position within the legal person, are officers.

1987, c. 96, a. 192; 1990, c. 4, s. 6; 2020, c. 12, s. 40.

192.1. Once an attorney begins to act on behalf of a defendant, one of them shall notify the prosecutor in writing of that fact. The notice shall include the attorney’s contact information and may be sent to the prosecutor by any means of communication.

However, such a notice is not required if the attorney informs the court, in the presence of a representative of the prosecutor, that he is acting on behalf of the defendant.

2020, c. 12, s. 40.

193. The judge may admit or reject a plea of guilty entered before him by a defendant before judgment is rendered. If he admits it, he shall render judgment; if he rejects it, he may either adjourn or proceed with the trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 193.

193.1. Despite any provision of this Code, a defendant may plead not guilty regarding an offence he has been charged with and plead guilty regarding another offence relating to the same case, whether or not it is an included offence.

The judge may, with the consent of the prosecutor, admit the defendant’s plea of guilty for that other offence. If the plea is admitted, the judge shall acquit the defendant of the offence he has been charged with and declare the defendant guilty of the other offence.

2020, c. 12, s. 41.

194. The trial shall be held in open court unless the presiding judge orders that it be held in camera in the general interest or in the interest of public order.

1987, c. 96, a. 194.

194.1. No person shall publish or broadcast information allowing the identification of a person under 18 years of age against whom proceedings are brought or who is a witness in proceedings, except to the extent that communication of the information is necessary for the administration of justice or for the purposes of any Act in Québec and provided, in the latter case, that the information is not disclosed to the public.

Furthermore, the judge may, in a special case, prohibit or restrict, on the conditions he fixes, the publication or broadcast of information relating to court proceedings brought against a person under 18 years of age.

Any person who contravenes a provision of the first paragraph is guilty of an offence and is liable to a fine of not less than $625 nor more than $5,000.

1995, c. 42, s. 52.

194.2. Persons present at a court hearing must conduct themselves in a respectful and restrained manner. Only those who prove their status as journalists may make a sound recording of the proceedings and the decision, unless the judge prohibits them from doing so. In no case may images be recorded or sound or image recordings be broadcast.

The parties and their attorneys are duty-bound to exercise restraint throughout the proceeding out of respect for the judicial process.

Every person, even if they are not present in person at a hearing, must comply with those rules and obey the orders of the judge and of the officers of justice under the judge’s authority, under pain of contempt of court.

2020, c. 29, s. 52.

195. The trial judge shall render judgment on the proceedings. Should the judge be unable to complete the trial or to render judgment by reason of illness or for any other serious reason, another judge of the same jurisdiction shall resume the trial.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where, after rendering his decision in respect of the conviction of the defendant or the dismissal of the proceedings, the judge is unable for any reason mentioned in the first paragraph to impose a sentence or to make an order, another judge of the same jurisdiction may take his place for the performance of that act.

However, if a judge ceases to hold office because of an appointment to another court, the judge may, with the agreement of the chief judges or chief justices of the courts concerned, continue and terminate any proceedings of which the judge was seized at the time of the appointment. Failing that, the procedure set out in the first two paragraphs is followed.

For the purposes of this article, a court means a municipal court, the Court of Québec, the Superior Court or the Court of Appeal.

1987, c. 96, a. 195; 2005, c. 26, s. 2.

196. The trial judge need not be the judge who rendered a decision in respect of the proceedings before trial, but the judge trying the proceedings is bound by any decision on a preliminary application taken before trial by another judge.

1987, c. 96, a. 196.

197. The judge may adjourn the trial of his own motion or on the application of either party; he may then condemn the party who applied for the adjournment to pay the costs fixed by regulation.

1987, c. 96, a. 197.

198. Where a defendant is under eighteen years of age and a duplicate of the statement of offence has not been served on his parents or, as the case may be, where the notice of his arrest has not been given to them, the judge may either try the proceedings and render judgment or order that the statement be served on them or that the notice be given to them and adjourn the trial for that purpose.

1987, c. 96, a. 198.

199. Where the defendant is in detention, no adjournment of his trial may exceed eight days without his consent unless he is detained for some other reason.

1987, c. 96, a. 199.

200. A judge who adjourns a trial may, on the application and with the consent of the parties, continue the trial on a date prior to that fixed at the time of the adjournment if he is satisfied that fixing a new date for the trial will facilitate the administration of justice.

1987, c. 96, a. 200.

201. The prosecutor has complete freedom within the limits prescribed by law in the conduct of the proceedings and the defendant has a right to a full and complete defence.

1987, c. 96, a. 201.

202. The prosecutor shall first present the evidence of the commission of the offence; the defendant may then, if he elects to do so, produce his defence and, finally, the prosecutor may adduce evidence in rebuttal.

1987, c. 96, a. 202.

203. The trial judge shall hear the witnesses summoned or the persons present at the trial whose testimony may be required by the prosecutor or the defendant.

The judge may order the persons to testify if he is satisfied that their testimony may be useful. They cannot refuse to testify on the ground that they were not duly summoned.

1987, c. 96, a. 203.

204. Testimony shall be taken in the manner determined by order of the Minister of Justice.

The judge may allow an interpretor he considers qualified to translate testimony where required.

1987, c. 96, a. 204.

205. Testimony may be transcribed in whole or in part on the application of the prosecutor or the defendant. The costs of transcription shall be assumed by the person who applies therefor.

The witness need not sign the transcript of his testimony, but the person having made the transcript must attest its accuracy under oath and sign it.

1987, c. 96, a. 205.

206. Where the trial judge discovers that he lacks jurisdiction in respect of the offence or the defendant, he shall raise that fact of his own motion and, on conditions he deems just and reasonable, order the transfer of the record to the judge having jurisdiction.

1987, c. 96, a. 206.

206.1. A court or judge does not lose jurisdiction in respect of an offence because of failure to exercise jurisdiction or because certain requirements for adjournment or postponement were not complied with.

The judge does not lose jurisdiction in respect of a defendant because an adjournment or postponement is ordered in the absence of the defendant.

2020, c. 29, s. 53.

207. Where the trial judge discovers any ground for dismissal of a count, he shall raise that fact of his own motion. He then has the powers and obligations of a judge having a preliminary application before him for dismissal of a count.

1987, c. 96, a. 207.

208. Subject to article 171, the trial judge may reserve his decision on the questions of law raised during the trial, but in case of an objection to the admissibility of any evidence and on the application of either party, he shall render his decision before the party who intended to submit that evidence declares his proof closed.

1987, c. 96, a. 208.

209. On the application of the prosecutor, the judge, on such conditions as he determines and if he is satisfied that no injustice will result thereby, shall allow him to amend a count to make it correspond to the evidence submitted if the count and the evidence submitted are different. The judge shall not, however, allow the substitution of defendants or of offences.

1987, c. 96, a. 209.

210. After the prosecutor has declared his proof closed, the defendant may apply for acquittal by reason of the total absence of proof of an essential element of the offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 210.

211. The judge, upon an application, shall allow a party to submit proof of a new fact or of a fact that he inadvertently omitted to prove, even after the parties have declared their proof closed, if he is satisfied that no injustice results thereby.

1987, c. 96, a. 211.

212. Unless he has made a defence, the defendant shall make his address after that of the prosecutor. The judge may allow the party who made his address first to reply.

1987, c. 96, a. 212.

213. Where the behaviour of the defendant during the trial, the testimony or, if the parties consent, the report of a duly qualified physician gives the judge reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant is mentally unfit to stand trial, the judge shall adjourn the trial until he renders a decision on the fitness of the defendant to stand trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 213.

214. Before deciding on the fitness of the defendant to stand trial, the judge may require that the defendant be given a psychiatric examination and order him to submit to such an examination.

1987, c. 96, a. 214; 1997, c. 75, s. 42.

215. After hearing the evidence and representations of the parties on the fitness of the defendant, the judge may suspend the proceedings for a period of one year if he is satisfied that the defendant is unfit to stand trial.

1987, c. 96, a. 215.

216. On the application of either party, the judge may, during the year of suspension, render another decision on the fitness of the defendant to stand trial and, for that purpose, exercise the powers contemplated in article 214.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the adverse party.

1987, c. 96, a. 216.

217. Where the judge is satisfied after hearing the evidence and representations of the parties that the defendant is fit to stand trial, he shall fix a date for the continuation of the trial; otherwise, the suspension shall continue.

1987, c. 96, a. 217.

218. The trial of proceedings cannot be continued where more than one year has elapsed from the date of suspension of proceedings.

A defendant cannot be prosecuted a second time for an offence for which proceedings were suspended and not continued or for an offence resulting from the same facts or the same event.

1987, c. 96, a. 218.

218.0.1. A judge may, on his own initiative or on a party’s application, order that a pre-trial conference be held to discuss the measures likely to promote a quick and efficient trial.

2015, c. 26, s. 14.

218.1. (Repealed).

1995, c. 51, s. 28; 2001, c. 32, s. 97.

DIVISION II PROVISIONS SPECIFIC TO THE TRIAL OF PROCEEDINGS DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEFENDANT

2005, c. 27, s. 12.

218.2. This division applies to the trial by default of proceedings relating to offences under the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) or a traffic or parking by-law adopted by a municipality if, pursuant to the second paragraph of article 163, the defendant is deemed not to contest the proceedings.

2005, c. 27, s. 12; 2015, c. 26, s. 15.

218.3. The proceedings shall be tried by a judge of the judicial district where they were instituted.

They may also be tried by a judge of the judicial district where the plea and, if applicable, the fine and costs were to be sent.

2005, c. 27, s. 12.

218.4. The judge shall try the case and render judgment by default, in the absence of the defendant and the prosecutor, based on the documents filed in the record.

The record is made up of

(1)  the statement of offence;

(2)  the attestation of the peace officer or of the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act indicating that he personally witnessed the offence and, if applicable, that the facts constituting the offence were partially witnessed by him and partially witnessed by another peace officer or another person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act;

(3)  the attestation of service of the statement of offence;

(4)  in the cases referred to in articles 158 and 158.1, the attestation that a notice was sent to the defendant;

(5)  in the cases referred to in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of article 157.2, the certificate of a person authorized for that purpose by the prosecutor attesting that the statement of offence was served in the manner and within the time prescribed in the applicable paragraph;

(6)  in the cases referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of article 157.2, the certificate of the person authorized for that purpose by the prosecutor attesting that the statement of offence and the photograph were sent in accordance with section 592.1 or 592.5 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2), as the case may be;

(7)  in the case referred to in paragraph 2 of article 157.2, the certificate of the person authorized for that purpose by the prosecutor attesting that the defendant is not a driver or a renter identified in accordance with section 592.1 or 592.1.1 of the Highway Safety Code; and

(8)  the certificate of a clerk or of a person authorized for that purpose by the prosecutor attesting that the defendant did not enter a plea of guilty or not guilty within the time prescribed in article 160 and did not pay the whole or any part of the fine and costs requested or, if applicable, send, within the time prescribed in section 592.1 of the Highway Safety Code, the declaration referred to in that section or in section 592.1.1 of that Code.

2005, c. 27, s. 12; 2015, c. 26, s. 16.

218.5. The judge shall examine the statement of offence and the related attestation of service, as well as the attestation referred to in subparagraph 2 of the second paragraph of article 218.4 and, if applicable, the certificates and the attestation referred to in subparagraphs 4 to 7 of the second paragraph of that article.

The judge shall make sure that a certificate attesting that the defendant did not enter a plea of guilty or not guilty within the time prescribed in article 160 and did not pay the whole or any part of the fine and costs requested and, if applicable, that the defendant did not send within the time prescribed in section 592.1 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) a declaration referred to in that section or in section 592.1.1 of that Code has been filed in the record. If the defendant is a natural person, the judge shall also make sure that the record contains an indication that the defendant is not a minor.

In addition, the judge shall make sure that, on the face of the record, the statement of offence and the attestation of the peace officer or the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act have been correctly filled out and

(1)  that the date and place the offence was committed are indicated in the statement;

(2)  that the offence was witnessed by a peace officer or a person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act;

(3)  that the peace officer or the person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act has attested, if such is the case, that the facts constituting the offence were partially witnessed by them and partially witnessed by another peace officer or another person entrusted with the enforcement of an Act;

(4)  that the statement identifies the defendant and the person who issued the statement; and

(5)  that it contains the required signatures.

2005, c. 27, s. 12; 2015, c. 26, s. 17.

218.6. The judge may amend a statement of offence of the judge’s own motion to correct an error in writing or calculation or any other clerical error. However, no correction unfavourable to the defendant may be made.

Under the judge’s power to make corrections, the judge may reduce the fine requested on the statement of offence to the minimum fine prescribed by law.

2005, c. 27, s. 12.

218.7. Division I does not apply to proceedings tried under this division.

2005, c. 27, s. 12.

CHAPTER VII JUDGMENT

DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS

219. The judge who renders judgment may acquit the defendant, convict him or dismiss the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 219.

220. Where a statement of offence contains several counts arising from the same facts or the same events, the judge may render judgment on each count; he shall commence with the count describing the most serious offence and continue in decreasing order to the count describing the least serious offence.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the judge convicts the defendant of an offence, he shall, unless he is satisfied that the lawgiver did not intend to prevent a conviction in respect of one of the other counts, postpone judgment on the other counts. The clerk shall enter that fact in the record of the judgment.

1987, c. 96, a. 220.

221. Where a judge acquits a defendant of an offence, he may nevertheless convict him of a lesser offence established by the evidence and included in the offence of which the defendant was acquitted.

1987, c. 96, a. 221.

222. When rendering judgment, the judge shall, where applicable, in accordance with Division IV of Chapter III, adapted as required, make an order for the disposition of things seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof that are still in detention, and of things submitted in evidence. The order is executory only after the expiry of 30 days, unless the parties waive that period.

The judge may also make any other order provided for by law.

In the case described in article 165, orders provided for by law may be made by a judge having jurisdiction to make them in the judicial district where proceedings were instituted.

If the judge who rendered the judgment does not have jurisdiction to make the orders referred to in this article, the orders may be made by any other judge who does have the required jurisdiction.

1987, c. 96, a. 222; 2005, c. 27, s. 13.

223. When rendering judgment, the judge may

(1)  order the defendant to pay the costs fixed by regulation where he convicts him of an offence and imposes a fine on him;

(2)  order the prosecutor to pay to the defendant the costs fixed by regulation if he considers the proceedings to be an abuse or clearly unfounded;

(3)  order the defendant or the prosecutor, as the case may be, to pay the costs fixed by regulation where it has been decided that they would be determined upon judgment on the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 223.

224. Before imposing sentence, ordering payment of the costs or making any other order, the judge rendering judgment shall give each party present an opportunity to be heard in that regard.

1987, c. 96, a. 224.

225. Once rendered, every judgment is final and cannot be upheld, quashed or amended except in accordance with this Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 225.

225.1. (Repealed).

1995, c. 51, s. 29; 2001, c. 32, s. 97.

226. A judgment may be recorded by the clerk in minutes taken in the form prescribed by order of the Minister of Justice.

1987, c. 96, a. 226.

227. A judgment rendered orally is deemed rendered on the date it is pronounced, while a judgment rendered in writing or for which the reasons are given in writing is deemed rendered on the date of filing of the writing in the court record.

1987, c. 96, a. 227.

228. Where sentence is imposed on a date subsequent to that of the judgment of guilty, the judgment is deemed rendered on the date of sentence. However, if the sentence is imposed or the reasons therefor are given in writing, the judgment is deemed rendered on the date of filing of the writing in the court record.

1987, c. 96, a. 228.

DIVISION I.1 PROVISIONS SPECIFIC TO JUDGMENTS RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS DEEMED UNCONTESTED BY THE DEFENDANT

2005, c. 27, s. 14.

228.1. After trying a case deemed uncontested by the defendant, the judge shall render a judgment convicting the defendant of the alleged offence, unless the judge considers that the statement of offence is clearly inaccurate or affected by an irregularity other than that referred to in article 218.6, in which case the judge shall cancel the proceedings. The prosecutor may serve another statement of offence on the defendant provided that prescription has not been acquired.

The time prescribed in section 592.1 or 592.5 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) for sending a statement of offence does not apply to that other statement of offence to the extent that the prosecutor complied with all the requirements of that section when sending the statement of offence which instituted the proceedings that were cancelled.

If the defendant is convicted, the judge shall impose the fine prescribed by law and the costs determined by regulation.

2005, c. 27, s. 14; 2015, c. 26, s. 18.

228.2. As soon as possible after the conviction, the clerk shall notify the defendant by mail.

2005, c. 27, s. 14.

228.3. Division I, except for articles 222 and 225 to 227, does not apply to judgments rendered under this division.

2005, c. 27, s. 14.

DIVISION II SENTENCE

229. Where a judge convicts a defendant of an offence, he shall impose upon him a sentence within the limits prescribed by law, taking into account in particular the special circumstances relating to the offence or to the defendant and any period of detention served by the defendant in respect of the offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 229.

230. Where an offence continued for more than one day, the judge is not bound to impose a sentence for each day or part of a day for which the offence continued if he is satisfied that the prosecutor unduly delayed to institute proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 230.

231. Except as otherwise prescribed in this Code and except in the case of contempt of court, imprisonment cannot be prescribed for offences under the statutes of Québec.

Any provision inconsistent with this article is without effect unless it states that it is applicable notwithstanding this article.

1987, c. 96, a. 231.

232. Where no sentence is prescribed in an Act for an offence, the sentence shall be a fine of $50 to $2,000.

1987, c. 96, a. 232.

232.1. Unless otherwise provided by law, a sentence applicable to a legal person is also applicable to a partnership.

2012, c. 25, s. 42.

233. Where the defendant is under 18 years of age, no fine to which he is liable may, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, exceed $500 or, if the defendant has contravened the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) or the Act respecting off-highway vehicles (chapter V-1.3), $750.

1987, c. 96, a. 233; 2015, c. 26, s. 19; 2020, c. 26, s. 149.

234. Where the defendant is a legal person, a fine of $500 to $10,000 shall be substituted for any compulsory term of imprisonment prescribed as a sentence for the offence committed by that defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 234.

235. Where a fine or a term of imprisonment may be imposed according to law for an offence, the fine shall be considered the minimum sentence.

Where the prescribed sentence is a fine of a fixed amount, it shall be considered the minimum sentence.

Where the prescribed sentence is a fine and no minimum amount is fixed, that amount shall be $50; where the maximum amount of the fine is less than $100, the minimum amount shall be equal to one-half of that maximum amount and, if it contains a fraction, it shall be rounded off to the next lower whole number.

1987, c. 96, a. 235.

236. Where an Act prescribes a greater sentence in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, that sentence cannot be imposed unless the offence takes place within two years after conviction of the defendant for an offence under the same provision as that under which the greater sentence is requested.

1987, c. 96, a. 236.

237. A judgment imposing a fine or the payment of costs is not executory before the expiry of at least 30 days, except where the person required to pay it waives that period, and it cannot include any order for recovery of the fine or costs. However, where the judge is satisfied that the defendant will abscond, he shall direct that, failing immediate payment of the sum due under the judgment, the defendant shall be imprisoned for the period he determines in accordance with articles 348 to 351.

1987, c. 96, a. 237; 1992, c. 61, s. 11.

238. Where a judge imposes imprisonment, he shall give the reasons for the conviction and the sentence in writing, except in the case of article 237.

1987, c. 96, a. 238.

239. A term of imprisonment is executory upon sentence.

Notwithstanding the first paragraph, the period of detention begins to run only from the time the defendant is imprisoned under a warrant of committal.

1987, c. 96, a. 239.

240. A term of detention is interrupted for the whole time that the defendant is released from custody according to law or is unlawfully at large. It begins to run again upon his reimprisonment to finish serving his sentence.

1987, c. 96, a. 240.

241. Subject to articles 350 and 351, when imposing more than one term of imprisonment on a defendant or imposing a term of imprisonment on a defendant who is already in detention, a judge may order that the terms be served consecutively.

1987, c. 96, a. 241; 1995, c. 51, s. 31; 2009, c. 58, s. 47.

242. Where the judge imposes a sentence of imprisonment for not over 90 days, he may order that it be served intermittently at the times and on the conditions he specifies in his judgment and in the warrant of committal.

1987, c. 96, a. 242.

CHAPTER VIII RECTIFICATION OF JUDGMENT

243. Every judgment or decision rendered under this Code may be rectified

(1)  to correct an error in writing or calculation or any other clerical error;

(2)  to bring the sentence imposed or the content of an order into conformity with the law;

(3)  to provide a measure that the judge was required to take but inadvertently omitted to take.

No correction unfavourable to the defendant may be made to a judgment referred to in article 165.

1987, c. 96, a. 243; 1992, c. 61, s. 12; 1995, c. 51, s. 32.

244. The rectification may be made by the judge who rendered the judgment or decision, of his own motion, so long as execution has not been commenced. The judge may notify the parties if he deems it advisable.

On the application of either party, the rectification may also be made at any time, if there is no appeal, by that judge or, if he is not available or does not have jurisdiction to make the rectification, by a judge having jurisdiction to render the judgment or decision in the judicial district where the judgment was rendered. Where the judgment was rendered in the district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, the application may also be made in the district where proceedings were instituted.

In the case of the Court of Appeal, the rectification shall be made by a judge who took part in the judgment or the decision of the Court or by the judge who rendered the decision or, if such a judge is not available, by another judge of that Court.

1987, c. 96, a. 244; 2005, c. 27, s. 15.

245. An application for rectification does not stay execution of the judgment or decision unless the judge so orders upon an application.

1987, c. 96, a. 245.

246. Prior notice of the application for rectification or for stay of execution shall be served on the adverse party, except on a defendant found guilty by default.

In case of urgency, the judge may order a stay of execution even if a prior notice of the application has not been served on the adverse party.

1987, c. 96, a. 246; 1992, c. 61, s. 13.

247. The person responsible for execution of the judgment or decision is bound to stay execution and to immediately return the order of execution to the office of the court upon being served a duplicate of the decision granting the application for stay of execution.

1987, c. 96, a. 247.

248. The time for appeal from a rectified judgment or decision begins to run from the date of rectification.

1987, c. 96, a. 248.

249. A judge dismissing an application for rectification may do so with or without costs in the amount fixed by regulation.

1987, c. 96, a. 249.

CHAPTER IX REVOCATION OF JUDGMENT

DIVISION I REVOCATION UPON APPLICATION OF THE DEFENDANT

250. Where a defendant convicted by default was, for a serious reason, prevented from submitting his defence, he may apply for revocation of judgment to the judge who rendered it or, if he is not available or does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for revocation, to a judge having jurisdiction to render such a judgment in the judicial district where the judgment was rendered.

Where the judgment was rendered in the district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, the application for revocation of judgment may also be made in the district where proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 250; 2005, c. 27, s. 16.

251. An application for revocation of judgment must be in writing and state, in addition to the grounds for the application, that the defendant contests the merits of the judgment.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the application may also be made orally if the defendant appears at the hearing after the judge has rendered judgment, provided that the judge and the prosecutor are still present in the court room.

1987, c. 96, a. 251.

252. The written application must be filed within 15 days after the defendant acquires knowledge of the judgment convicting him.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the judge, on a written application, may relieve the defendant of the consequences of his delay if he proves that he was unable to file an application for revocation of judgment within the prescribed time.

1987, c. 96, a. 252.

253. The judge shall grant the application for revocation of judgment if he is satisfied that the grounds alleged are serious and that the defendant has a ground for contesting the merits of the judgment.

Where the application is granted, the parties are placed in the position they were in before the trial and the judge may thereupon recommence the trial or adjourn the new trial to a later date.

1987, c. 96, a. 253.

254. Where the judge dismisses an application for revocation of judgment, he may do so with or without costs, in the amount fixed by regulation. Where he grants the application, he may do so without costs or order that the amount of the costs be determined, if advisable, at the time of the judgment on the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 254.

255. An application for revocation of judgment does not stay execution of judgment unless the judge so orders upon an application by the defendant.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the prosecutor unless he is present when it is made. In cases of urgency, however, the judge may order a stay of execution even if prior notice of the application has not been served on the prosecutor.

The stay of execution, if ordered, ends on the date set for the presentation of an application for revocation of judgment, unless the judge orders the stay to be extended

(1)  until the date to which he adjourns the presentation of the application for revocation of judgment; or

(2)  until he renders a decision on the application for revocation of judgment made to him.

1987, c. 96, a. 255; 2020, c. 12, s. 42.

256. The person responsible for the execution of the judgment is bound to stay execution and to immediately return the order of execution to the office of the court on being served a duplicate of the decision granting the application for revocation of judgment or for stay of execution.

1987, c. 96, a. 256; 1990, c. 4, s. 7.

DIVISION II REVOCATION UPON APPLICATION OF THE PROSECUTOR

257. Where a prosecutor discovers that, as a result of an administrative error, the defendant has been convicted by default, he shall, unless an appeal has been filed, make an application for revocation of the judgment to the judge who rendered it or, if he is not available or does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for revocation, to a judge having jurisdiction to render such a judgment in the judicial district where judgment was rendered.

The prosecutor may also make an application for revocation of a judgment to such a judge where the defendant has fully or partially, to the prosecutor’s satisfaction, completed a judgment execution rules adaptation program referred to in the second paragraph of article 333 for the offences or classes of offences covered by the program. The processes undertaken by the defendant before the defendant’s participation in such a program must also be taken into consideration by the prosecutor.

Where judgment was rendered in the district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, the application for revocation of judgment may also be made in the district where proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 257; 2005, c. 27, s. 17; 2020, c. 12, s. 43.

258. The application for revocation of judgment shall be made orally.

Notwithstanding the first paragraph, the judge may order that prior notice be served on the defendant and adjourn the hearing of the application to the date he indicates in the notice.

1987, c. 96, a. 258.

259. The judge shall grant the application for revocation of judgment if he is satisfied that the grounds invoked for setting it aside justify a new trial.

Where the application is granted, the parties are placed in the position they were in before the trial and the judge may thereupon recommence the trial or adjourn the new trial to a later date.

In the case referred to in the second paragraph of article 257, the judge shall grant the application for revocation if he is satisfied that

(1)  the judgment execution rules adaptation program in which the defendant participated corresponds to the defendant’s needs;

(2)  the defendant fully or partially completed the program in compliance with the conditions determined in the program; and

(3)  the revocation is in the interests of justice.

The prosecutor shall provide the judge with confirmation that the conditions set out in subparagraphs 1 to 3 of the third paragraph have been met.

1987, c. 96, a. 259; 2020, c. 12, s. 44.

260. An application for revocation of judgment stays execution of judgment.

The person responsible for the execution of a judgment must stay execution and immediately return the order of execution to the office of the court upon being informed that an application for revocation of judgment has been made.

1987, c. 96, a. 260.

DIVISION III REDUCTION OF COSTS

261. A defendant who has been convicted by default of an offence may demand that the costs be reduced to the minimum amount fixed by regulation even if he pleads guilty to the offence.

1987, c. 96, a. 261; 1992, c. 61, s. 14.

262. The application for reduction shall be made in writing to the judge who rendered judgment or, if he is not available or does not have jurisdiction to hear an application for the reduction of costs, to a judge having jurisdiction to render such a judgment in the judicial district where judgment was rendered.

Where judgment was rendered in the district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, the application for reduction may also be made in the district where proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 262; 2005, c. 27, s. 18.

263. The judge shall grant the application without costs if he is satisfied that it was not possible for the defendant to be aware, without negligence on his part, that the statement of offence had been served on him. If he dismisses the application, the judge may award the costs fixed by regulation against the defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 263.

264. Articles 252, 255 and 256 apply to this division with the necessary modifications.

1987, c. 96, a. 264.

CHAPTER X APPLICATIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS

I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

265. Articles 82 and 529 to 535 of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) apply to judgments and decisions rendered under this Code.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no remedy under the said articles may be made in the case of a judgment or decision that is or was appealable by operation of law or with leave.

Where the judge dismisses an application for judicial review or habeas corpus proceedings, he may do so with or without costs, in the amount fixed by regulation. Where he grants the application, he may do so without costs or order that the amount be determined, if advisable, at the time of the judgment on the proceedings.

1987, c. 96, a. 265; 2014, c. 1, s. 779; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

CHAPTER XI APPEAL TO THE SUPERIOR COURT

DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS

266. In this chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise, “judgment rendered in first instance” means

(1)  a judgment of acquittal or conviction of a defendant and the sentence imposed or any order made or denied at the time of the judgment;

(2)  a decision directing the dismissal of a count;

(3)  a judicial stay of proceedings;

(4)  a decision to grant or dismiss an application for revocation of judgment;

(5)  a judgment finding the defendant mentally unfit to stand trial;

(6)  an order directing that a thing seized or the proceeds of the sale thereof be detained, forfeited or returned.

1987, c. 96, a. 266.

267. An appeal from a judgment rendered in first instance may contemplate only the sentence or an order or only the conviction or acquittal.

Where the appeal contemplates both the sentence or an order and the conviction or, as the case may be, the acquittal, it must be brought by way of the same notice of appeal.

1987, c. 96, a. 267.

268. The defendant, the prosecutor or, even if he was not a party to the proceedings, the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions may appeal from a judgment rendered in first instance.

1987, c. 96, a. 268; 2005, c. 34, s. 86.

269. A person does not waive his right of appeal by the sole fact that he pays the fine imposed or complies in any way with the judgment rendered in first instance.

1987, c. 96, a. 269.

DIVISION II INSTITUTION OF APPEAL

270. An appeal shall be brought before the Superior Court of the judicial district in which the judgment was rendered in first instance.

Where judgment was rendered in the district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, the appeal may also be brought in the judicial district where proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 270; 2005, c. 27, s. 19.

271. An appeal must be brought within 30 days of the judgment rendered in first instance.

Upon a written application by the appellant, an appeal may be brought within any other time fixed by a judge of the Superior Court of the judicial district in which the appeal is brought. The application may be made even after the expiry of 30 days.

1987, c. 96, a. 271.

272. An appeal is brought by filing a notice of appeal in the office of the Superior Court.

The notice must indicate the grounds for the appeal and the conclusions sought and be drafted concisely and precisely in accordance with the court regulations. Proof of service on the respondent must be attached.

1987, c. 96, a. 272; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

273. On receiving the notice of appeal, the clerk of the Superior Court shall transmit a duplicate to the office of the court of first instance and another to the judge of first instance who rendered the judgment.

The clerk of the court of first instance shall then transmit the record to the office of the Superior Court without delay, in accordance with the court regulations.

1987, c. 96, a. 273; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

274. The respondent shall, within ten days of the filing of the notice of appeal in the office of the Superior Court, file a written appearance in the same office.

Notwithstanding the first paragraph, a judge may, upon application, authorize the respondent to file a written appearance after the expiry of the prescribed time.

Prior notice of at least one clear day of presentation of the application must be served on the appellant.

1987, c. 96, a. 274.

275. The clerk of the Superior Court must enter an appeal on the roll once it is ready for hearing.

1987, c. 96, a. 275.

276. The filing of the notice of appeal stays the execution of the judgment rendered in first instance, except a judgment by which the defendant is imprisoned.

1987, c. 96, a. 276.

277. Upon an application by a defendant appealing the judgment by which he is imprisoned, a judge of the Superior Court of the judicial district where the appeal is brought shall release the defendant from custody on the conditions he determines, particularly the furnishing of a security, unless he believes that the defendant will abscond or will not keep the peace while awaiting judgment on the appeal; the judge ordering continuation of the detention of the defendant shall make any order to expedite the hearing of the appeal.

Prior notice of at least one clear day of the application for release from custody must be served on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 277.

278. To guarantee execution of the judgment on the appeal, the judge may, on a written application by the respondent, order that the appeal be heard on condition that the appellant, except the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions, furnish security in the amount and on the terms and conditions of payment determined by the judge.

1987, c. 96, a. 278; 2005, c. 34, s. 86.

279. On a written application by the respondent, the judge shall dismiss any appeal he considers to be frivolous or clearly unfounded.

If the judge dismisses the appeal, he may award the costs fixed by regulation against the appellant. If he dismisses the application of the respondent, he may award the costs fixed by regulation against the respondent.

1987, c. 96, a. 279.

280. The appellant may abandon his appeal by filing a notice of abandonment at the office of the Superior Court where the appeal is brought. In that case, the judge of that court may award the costs fixed by regulation against the appellant.

The notice of abandonment must be served by the appellant on the respondent.

The documents transmitted to the Superior Court by the clerk of the court of first instance and a copy of the notice of abandonment must be returned to the office of the court where the judgment was rendered in first instance.

1987, c. 96, a. 280.

DIVISION III HEARING OF APPEAL AND JUDGMENT

281. The hearing of an appeal shall be based on the record prepared in accordance with the court regulations.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, on the application of one of the parties, the appeal may be heard by way of a new hearing where, because of the state of the record or for any other cause, the judge considers it preferable in the interests of justice to hear the appeal in the form of a new hearing.

1987, c. 96, a. 281; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

282. The application for an appeal by way of a new hearing must be filed in writing within ten days of the appearance of the respondent.

If the judge dismisses the application, he may award the costs fixed by regulation against the applicant.

1987, c. 96, a. 282.

283. An appeal heard by way of a new hearing shall be held in accordance with the provisions of this Code relating to trial and judgment in first instance and with the regulations adopted by the Superior Court under this Code.

The judge hearing the appeal may allow any testimony given in first instance, in writing or on magnetic tape to be submitted in evidence unless he is satisfied that a party will suffer prejudice thereby.

1987, c. 96, a. 283; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

284. An appeal heard on the record shall be presented orally by the parties. The parties may, in addition, present their arguments in writing within the time and in the form prescribed in the court regulations.

1987, c. 96, a. 284; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

285. The judge hearing an appeal on the record may exercise all the powers conferred by this Code to the judge who rendered judgment in first instance.

The judge may, in particular, admit any new evidence, order the production of anything connected with the case, order the summons of any compellable witness, who may then be examined or cross-examined, as the case may be, by the parties, and make any order in the interests of justice.

1987, c. 96, a. 285.

286. The judge shall grant an appeal on the record if he is satisfied by the appellant that the judgment rendered in first instance is unreasonable, considering the evidence, that an error in law has been made or that justice has not been rendered.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where the prosecutor appeals from a judgment of acquittal and where there has been an error in law, the judge may dismiss the appeal unless the prosecutor shows that, but for that error, the judgment would have been different.

Where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction or a judgment concluding that the defendant is mentally unfit to stand trial and where there has been an error in law, the judge may dismiss the appeal if the prosecutor shows that, notwithstanding that error, the judgment would have been the same.

1987, c. 96, a. 286.

287. The judge may, if he grants the appeal on the record, quash, in whole or in part, the judgment rendered in first instance. He shall then render the judgment that should have been rendered in first instance or order a trial before a judge other than the judge who rendered judgment in first instance.

1987, c. 96, a. 287.

288. Where the judge orders that a trial be held, he may, upon application, release from custody, on the conditions he determines, in particular, the furnishing of security, a defendant who has been detained under the judgment rendered in first instance unless he is satisfied that the defendant will abscond or will not keep the peace until judgment is rendered on the new trial; a judge ordering continuation of the detention of the defendant shall make any order to expedite the new trial in first instance.

Prior notice of at least one clear day of the application for release from custody must be served on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 288; 1990, c. 4, s. 8.

289. If the judge dismisses the appeal on the record, he may, in accordance with article 223, award the costs fixed by regulation for the trial in first instance and the appeal against the appellant.

1987, c. 96, a. 289.

290. A duplicate of the judgment rendered in appeal and the documents transmitted to the Superior Court by the clerk of the court of first instance must be sent to the office of the court where the judgment was rendered in first instance.

1987, c. 96, a. 290.

CHAPTER XII APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL

DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS

291. The appellant or respondent in Superior Court and, even if they were not parties to the proceedings, the Attorney General and the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions may, if they show sufficient interest in a question of law alone, bring an appeal before the Court of Appeal, with leave of a judge of that court, from a judgment

(1)  rendered in appeal by a judge of the Superior Court;

(2)  granting or dismissing an application for habeas corpus or application for judicial review.

1987, c. 96, a. 291; 2005, c. 34, s. 50; 2014, c. 1, s. 779.

292. An interlocutory judgment rendered in first instance or in Superior Court which rules on an objection to the evidence based on article 283 of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) or section 9 of the Charter of human rights and freedoms (chapter C-12) or which rules on the confidentiality of information disclosed through a thing seized may also be appealed immediately.

Such appeal takes place with leave of a judge of the Court of Appeal, where the objection to the evidence has been admitted or where the confidentiality of the information has been declared. The judge who grants such leave shall then order the continuation or stay of proceedings in first instance or in Superior Court, as the case may be.

The appeal takes place by operation of law where the objection to the evidence has been denied or where the nonconfidentiality of the information has been declared. The appeal does not stay proceedings but the judge of first instance or of the Superior Court, as the case may be, cannot hear the evidence contemplated by the objection or permit access to the information or render judgment on the proceedings until the appeal from the judgment is decided.

The appeal is heard by preference, unless the chief justice decides otherwise.

1987, c. 96, a. 292; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

293. A person does not waive his right to appeal by the sole fact that he pays the fine imposed or complies in any way with the judgment from which he is appealing.

1987, c. 96, a. 293.

DIVISION II INSTITUTION OF APPEAL

294. An appeal shall be brought before the Court of Appeal sitting at Montréal or at Québec according to where an appeal from a judgment in a civil matter would lie, or, also, where the judgment was rendered in the judicial district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, according to where the appeal from the judgment would lie if it had been rendered in the district where proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 294; 2005, c. 27, s. 20.

295. The sitting of the court shall be composed of three judges, but the chief justice may increase that number where he considers it advisable.

A judge of the Court of Appeal may refer to the court any application addressed to him under this chapter.

1987, c. 96, a. 295.

296. Application for leave to appeal must be presented in writing within 30 days from the appealed judgment. It must indicate, in particular, the grounds for the appeal and the conclusions sought and be drafted concisely and precisely in accordance with the court regulations. A copy of the appealed judgment must be attached to the application.

Upon the written application of the appellant, the application for leave to appeal may be presented within any other time fixed by a judge of the Court of Appeal, before or after the expiry of the period of 30 days.

1987, c. 96, a. 296; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

297. Service of the application for leave to appeal from a judgment stays execution of the judgment, except a judgment under which the defendant is imprisoned.

1987, c. 96, a. 297.

298. On the application of a defendant who has served an application for leave to appeal from the judgment under which he is imprisoned, a judge of the Court of Appeal shall release him from custody on the conditions he determines, particularly the furnishing of security, unless he is satisfied that the defendant will abscond or will not keep the peace while awaiting judgment on the appeal; the judge ordering continuation of the detention of the defendant shall make any order that may expedite the hearing in appeal.

Prior notice of at least one clear day of the application for release from custody must be served on the prosecutor.

1987, c. 96, a. 298.

299. Where the judge grants leave to appeal, he may, to guarantee execution of the judgment on the appeal, order that the appeal be heard on the condition that the appellant, except the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions, pay security in the amount and on the terms and conditions determined by the judge.

Where the judge refuses leave to appeal, he may award costs fixed by regulation against the appellant.

1987, c. 96, a. 299; 2005, c. 34, s. 86.

300. The appeal is brought when the clerk of the Court of Appeal files the judgment granting leave to appeal in the office of the court.

1987, c. 96, a. 300.

301. The clerk of the Court of Appeal shall transmit a copy of the judgment granting leave to appeal to the parties unless they were present when the leave was granted.

He shall also give notice to the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions of any judgment granting leave to appeal and transmit to him a copy of the application for leave to appeal provided for in article 296.

1987, c. 96, a. 301; 1995, c. 51, s. 33; 2005, c. 34, s. 85.

302. On the granting of the application for leave to appeal, the clerk of the Court of Appeal shall also transmit a duplicate of the application and the judgment granting the leave to the office of the court where the appealed judgment was rendered, and to the judge who rendered it.

At the request of a judge of the Court of Appeal, the clerk of the court where the appealed judgment was rendered shall transmit the record forthwith to the office of the Court of Appeal, in accordance with the regulations of the Court.

1987, c. 96, a. 302; 1995, c. 51, s. 34; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

303. The respondent shall, within ten days following the day on which he has knowledge of the judgment granting leave to appeal, file a written appearance in the office of the Court of Appeal.

Notwithstanding the first paragraph, a judge may, upon application, authorize the respondent to file a written appearance after the expiry of the prescribed time.

Prior notice of at least one clear day of the application must be served on the appellant.

1987, c. 96, a. 303.

304. Within 60 days of the judgment granting leave to appeal, the appellant shall file a factum at the office of the Court of Appeal together with proof of its service on the respondent.

1987, c. 96, a. 304.

305. Within 60 days of the filing of the factum of the appellant, the respondent shall file a factum at the office of the court together with proof of its service on the appellant.

1987, c. 96, a. 305.

306. The parties shall set out in their factums, in accordance with the court regulations, the grounds for the contestation in appeal, their arguments and the conclusions sought.

1987, c. 96, a. 306; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

307. Upon an application, a judge may dismiss the appeal of an appellant who does not file a factum within the prescribed time or bar a respondent from pleading where he does not file a factum within the prescribed time.

Prior notice of the application must be served on the adverse party.

Where a judge bars the respondent from pleading, the appellant may request the clerk to enter the appeal on the roll.

1987, c. 96, a. 307.

308. Upon the joint application of the parties, a judge of the Court of Appeal may, if he sees fit, exempt the parties from filing a factum and authorize them to submit the appeal orally.

1987, c. 96, a. 308.

309. The clerk of the Court of Appeal shall enter an appeal on the roll when it is ready for hearing.

1987, c. 96, a. 309.

310. If, within one year from the date on which it was brought, the appeal is not ready to be entered on the roll, the clerk shall notify the parties, at least 60 days in advance, that the appeal has been entered on a special roll, and indicate the date of the hearing of the appeal.

If, on the date specified by the clerk, the appeal is not ready for hearing, a judge of the Court of Appeal may, after giving the parties an opportunity to be heard, declare the appeal abandoned, unless a valid reason is presented by one of the parties. The judge may in that case make any order he sees fit.

1987, c. 96, a. 310.

311. The appellant may abandon his appeal by filing a notice of abandonment. The judge may award the costs fixed by regulation against the appellant.

Notice of the abandonment must be served on the respondent by the appellant.

A copy of the notice of abandonment must be transmitted to the office of the court where the appealed judgment was rendered. The same applies to the record transmitted, at the request of a judge of the Court of Appeal to the office of the Court of Appeal.

A copy of the notice of abandonment must also be transmitted to the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions.

1987, c. 96, a. 311; 1995, c. 51, s. 36; 2005, c. 34, s. 85.

DIVISION III HEARING OF THE APPEAL AND JUDGMENT

312. The court which hears the appeal may exercise all the powers conferred by this Code on the judge whose judgment is appealed.

The court may, in particular, admit any new evidence, order the production of anything connected with the case, order the summons of any compellable witness, who may then be examined or cross-examined, as the case may be, by the parties, and make any order in the interests of justice.

1987, c. 96, a. 312.

313. Articles 286 to 290 apply, adapted as required, to the judgment on the appeal.

Notwithstanding the first paragraph, the court may return the record to the court of first instance or the Superior Court for sentencing.

1987, c. 96, a. 313.

314. An application for release from custody for the duration of the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada must be addressed to a judge of the Court of Appeal and articles 297 and 298, adapted as required, apply to the application.

1987, c. 96, a. 314.

CHAPTER XIII EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS

DIVISION I GENERAL PROVISIONS

2003, c. 5, s. 17.

315. All sums due from a party to a proceeding or witness under an order given by a judge in accordance with this Code shall be recovered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

All sums due from a witness shall be recovered in the same manner as the sums due from a defendant.

1987, c. 96, a. 315.

316. The powers conferred on a judge under this chapter may be exercised by the judge who made the order to pay or, if he is not available or does not have jurisdiction to exercise the powers conferred on a judge by this chapter, by a judge having jurisdiction to make such an order in the judicial district where the order was made.

Where the order was made in the district contemplated in the second paragraph of article 187 or the second paragraph of article 218.3, the powers described in the first paragraph may also be exercised by a judge having jurisdiction in the district where proceedings were instituted.

1987, c. 96, a. 316; 2005, c. 27, s. 21.

317. The costs of execution shall be fixed by regulation and be payable by the party against whom the judgment or decision has been rendered.

Costs of execution shall not be imposed on the defendant in respect of imprisonment, except in the case of imprisonment in default of payment of sums due.

1987, c. 96, a. 317.

318. Unless otherwise provided, all sums due from a defendant and all things forfeited upon judgment belong to the State; the sums due shall be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund and the things forfeited shall be delivered to the Minister of Revenue.

The intervention of the Attorney General or the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions as a party to take the place of the party who instituted proceedings does not operate to change the specific rules set out in another Act specifying the payee of the fines.

1987, c. 96, a. 318; 1999, c. 40, s. 57; 2005, c. 44, s. 54; 2020, c. 12, s. 45.

319. Where a sum is due from the State, the Minister of Finance shall pay it after receiving a certified copy of the document containing the order of payment. He shall take the sum necessary for the payment out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund or out of the budget allocated to that purpose.

1987, c. 96, a. 319; 1999, c. 40, s. 57.

320. An order enjoining the prosecutor to pay costs shall be executory upon an application of the party entitled thereto and according to the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01) relating to the execution of judgments of the Superior Court or the Court of Québec, according to the amount involved.

1987, c. 96, a. 320; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

321. The sums due from a defendant shall be paid out of the security where the defendant furnished security and where it has not been forfeited. Where the amount of the security exceeds the sum due, the balance shall be returned to the person who paid it.

Where the defendant owes no money, the amount of the security shall be remitted to the person who paid it.

1987, c. 96, a. 321.

322. The Minister of Justice shall appoint persons to act as collectors. The powers conferred on collectors may be restricted to the purposes defined in the instrument of appointment.

Unless judgment has been satisfied, the collector shall without delay send a notice of judgment to the defendant and, where such is the case, a demand for payment of the sum due within the time indicated.

1987, c. 96, a. 322; 2002, c. 21, s. 51.

322.1. Where an order to pay an amount of money becomes executory, the collector may summon the defendant to appear before a judge or the clerk of the court in the district where the judgment was rendered or in the district of the defendant’s residence so that the defendant can be examined as to the property he owns and his sources of income.

Where the defendant is a legal person, the summons shall be addressed to one of its senior officers; where the defendant is a foreign partnership or legal person carrying on business in Québec, the summons shall be addressed to its agent.

1995, c. 51, s. 37.

322.2. A judge may, on the motion of the collector, order a defendant to produce all documents allowing his financial situation to be established and authorize the examination before the clerk of any person who is in a position to provide information regarding the defendant’s situation.

1995, c. 51, s. 37.

323. Where an order to pay an amount of money becomes executory, a judge may, on application by the collector and if the defendant cannot be found, order the competent authority of a department or governmental body to provide the collector with available information as to the residence or place of employment of the defendant in default and, if need be, allow a person employed by such department or body designated by the judge to be examined for that purpose before him or any other judge of the same jurisdiction.

This article applies notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of any Act, unless it expressly states that it is applicable notwithstanding this article. This article does not apply to a person who has received the information in the performance of his duties and who is bound to the defendant by professional secrecy.

1987, c. 96, a. 323; 1990, c. 4, s. 9; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

324. Where the defendant cannot be found and where he did not pay the sums due, the collector may, in order to recover the sums in accordance with this chapter, apply to the judge to issue a warrant to bring a defendant before the collector.

Where the defendant cannot be brought forthwith before the collector, the person who arrested him shall release him from custody providing he gives his address or, if necessary, any information confirming the accuracy thereof, and undertakes to appear before the collector on the day specified in the recognizance; where the defendant refuses to comply with these requirements, he shall be brought before the judge who issued the warrant or a judge having jurisdiction to issue such a warrant within the same judicial district or before a judge having jurisdiction in the judicial district where the warrant was executed. Where the defendant persists in his refusal, the judge shall order his imprisonment and issue a warrant of committal in default of payment of the sums due.

1987, c. 96, a. 324; 1995, c. 51, s. 38; 2020, c. 12, s. 46.

325. The defendant may pay the sums due in whole or in part to the person entrusted with the execution of the warrant to bring a defendant. Such person shall give a receipt to the defendant as evidence of payment and remit the amount paid to the collector.

Payment of the total amount due suspends execution of the warrant.

1987, c. 96, a. 325; 2020, c. 12, s. 47.

326. The warrant to bring a defendant shall contain the name of the defendant and describe the grounds on which it is issued. It shall order that the defendant be arrested and brought before the collector to pay the sums due and shall be signed by the judge who issues it. The first paragraph of article 45, articles 46 and 47 and, where the defendant is not released from custody, articles 48 to 50 apply, adapted as required, to the execution of the warrant.

Such a warrant which is not executed within two years of its issue is null.

1987, c. 96, a. 326; 1992, c. 61, s. 15; 2020, c. 12, s. 48.

327. On application by the defendant, the collector may grant him an extension of time for payment of the sums due if an examination of the defendant’s financial situation leads the collector to believe that the defendant can afford to pay them but that an extension of time is justified in the circumstances.

1987, c. 96, a. 327.

328. The collector and the defendant may enter into an agreement in writing whereby the sums due will be paid by instalments at the time and on the terms and conditions they determine.

1987, c. 96, a. 328.

329. The collector may make a seizure where the time for payment of the sums due has expired or where the defendant fails to comply with the agreement entered into with the collector.

1987, c. 96, a. 329.

330. Seizures are effected according to the rules for the execution of judgments set out in Book VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01), subject to the special rules of this Code and to the following rules:

(1)  the collector for the place where the order to pay has been given is responsible for the collection of the sums due and acts as seizor; the collector prepares the notice of execution and files it with the court office; the notice is valid only for the execution of a judgment effected under this chapter and does not preclude the filing of another notice for the execution of a judgment under the Code of Civil Procedure;

(2)  the collector proceeds with the seizure of a sum of money or income in the hands of a third person in the same manner as a bailiff, but entrusts the administration of subsequent steps, including the receipt and distribution of the sum or income, to a court clerk designated by the collector; the collector serves the notice of execution on the defendant and the garnishee in accordance with article 20, but is not required to inform the defendant’s creditors or deal with their claims, or to join in a seizure in the hands of a third person already undertaken by a bailiff in another case if the seizure to be made by the collector is for other sums or income than the sums or income specified in the notice of execution filed by the bailiff;

(3)  the collector is required to hire the services of a bailiff for the seizure of movable or immovable property, to give the bailiff instructions and to amend the notice of execution accordingly; in such a case, if a notice for the execution of a judgment was filed by a bailiff in another case prior to the collector’s request, the bailiff hired by the collector joins in the seizure already under way.

The collector is not required to pay an advance to cover the safekeeping costs or other execution-related disbursements.

1987, c. 96, a. 330; 1992, c. 61, s. 16; 2014, c. 1, s. 820.

331. The Superior Court or the Court of Québec, according to the amount involved, or if the order for payment is made by a municipal court, the municipal court, is the court that has jurisdiction to decide all seizure-related matters.

1987, c. 96, a. 331; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 1999, c. 40, s. 57; 2014, c. 1, s. 821.

332. Before making a seizure of immovable property, the collector shall obtain the authorization of a judge, who shall

(1)  authorize the collector to proceed with the seizure immediately, or

(2)  in exceptional circumstances and where he is satisfied that the interests of justice so require, authorize the collector to proceed with the seizure but only if the defendant refuses or neglects to carry out compensatory work.

1987, c. 96, a. 332.

332.1. Where an order to pay an amount of money has been issued for a parking or traffic violation under an Act, regulation or by-law, the local collector may also cause a peace officer, a bailiff or an employee designated by a municipality to seize and immobilize, tow away or impound a motor vehicle registered in the name of the defendant, without fulfilling the formalities of seizure provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C-25.01), in order that the vehicle be disposed of by sale under judicial authority; the seized party or a third person may oppose the seizure in accordance with the said Code.

1995, c. 51, s. 39; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

332.2. A motor vehicle may be immobilized or towed away only if it is parked on a public road or on land belonging to a municipality.

Where a motor vehicle is immobilized, a notice shall be posted in plain view on the vehicle to warn the driver that the vehicle has been immobilized and that any attempt to move the vehicle could damage it. The notice shall also indicate where the driver may apply to have the immobilizing device removed.

1995, c. 51, s. 39.

332.3. Unless he makes a written agreement with the collector, the defendant may not recover possession of the motor vehicle until he has paid the fine and costs, including reasonable immobilization, towing or impounding costs as prescribed by by-law of the local municipality in whose territory the payment order was issued.

1995, c. 51, s. 39; 1996, c. 2, s. 216.

333. Where a collector has reasonable grounds to believe that seizure does not or will not permit the recovery of the sums due from the defendant and is convinced, after examining the defendant’s financial situation, that the defendant is unable to pay, the collector must offer the defendant the option of paying the sums due by means of compensatory work, to the extent that compensatory work programs are available.

All or part of the compensatory work may be replaced by alternative measures to the extent that a judgment execution rules adaptation program, within the framework of an education, public awareness, prevention, intervention, reparation or rehabilitation process, is available.

In this Code, unless the context indicates otherwise, “compensatory work” also refers to the alternative measures provided for in such a program.

1987, c. 96, a. 333; 1995, c. 51, s. 40; 2003, c. 5, s. 18; 2020, c. 12, s. 49.

334. The collector or the person or body he designates shall determine the nature of the compensatory work that the defendant may undertake to carry out.

Where the defendant is under 18 years of age, the collector shall entrust the director of youth protection having jurisdiction in the place of the defendant’s residence with determining the nature of the compensatory work and supervising it.

1987, c. 96, a. 334.

335. A defendant who agrees to carry out compensatory work may, if he performs the work, pay by such work all the sums due at the time of the agreement.

The agreement shall be in writing.

1987, c. 96, a. 335.

336. The amounts of the sums due shall be added up to determine the duration of the compensatory work in accordance with the schedule.

Where the total number of compensatory work hours to be carried out for a portion referred to in the schedule contains a fraction, it shall be rounded off to the nearest whole number; where the fraction is 1/2, the number shall be rounded off to the next lower whole number.

Where the defendant opts for alternative measures, the duration of the compensatory work may be modified.

1987, c. 96, a. 336; 2020, c. 12, s. 50.

337. In no case may the defendant agree to carry out more than 1,500 compensatory work hours.

Where the defendant opts for alternative measures in place of compensatory work, the number of hours provided for in the first paragraph does not apply.

Among other things, a commitment by the defendant to undertake a training program or to keep a dwelling constitutes an alternative measure.

The carrying out of compensatory work corresponding to the maximum provided for in the first paragraph enables the defendant to pay all the sums due at the time of the agreement, whatever their amount.

1987, c. 96, a. 337; 2020, c. 12, s. 51.

338. The compensatory work must be completed within 12 months of the agreement, unless the sums due exceed $10,000, in which case it must be completed within two years of the agreement.

Where the defendant opts for alternative measures, the time limits prescribed in the first paragraph do not apply.

1987, c. 96, a. 338; 2020, c. 12, s. 52.

339. Upon completion of the work, the person or body referred to in article 334 shall make a report to the collector on the carrying out of the work.

On the signing of the report by the collector, the defendant is released from payment of the sums due.

1987, c. 96, a. 339; 1995, c. 51, s. 41.

340. Chapter III of the Public Administration Act (chapter A‐6.01), the Labour Code (chapter C‐27), the Act respecting collective agreement decrees (chapter D‐2), the Public Service Act (chapter F‐3.1.1), the Act respecting workforce vocational training and qualification (chapter F‐5), the Act respecting labour standards (chapter N‐1.1), Chapter IV of the Building Act (chapter B‐1.1), the Master Electricians Act (chapter M‐3), the Master Pipe‐Mechanics Act (chapter M‐4) and the Act respecting labour relations, vocational training and workforce management in the construction industry (chapter R‐20) do not apply when compensatory work is carried out under this chapter.

1987, c. 96, a. 340; 2000, c. 8, s. 109; 2007, c. 3, s. 72.

341. Notwithstanding section 6 of the Act respecting occupational health and safety (chapter S-2.1), only sections 12 to 48 and paragraph 11 of section 51 of the said Act apply to a person who carries out compensatory work.

For the carrying out of the said Act,

(1)  the Government is deemed to be the employer of that person;

(2)  the contribution of the employer is established according to the standards applied under the said Act by the Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail.

1987, c. 96, s. 341; 2015, c. 15, s. 237.

342. Where a defendant agrees to carry out compensatory work, he may, before beginning it, pay all the sums due to the collector with whom he has made the agreement.

1987, c. 96, a. 342.

343. The defendant may, while carrying out compensatory work, pay the balance of the sums due to the collector.

The amount of the sums due at the time of the agreement shall be reduced proportionately to the ratio between the number of compensatory work hours already carried out or paid and the number of hours to be carried out at the time of the agreement.

1987, c. 96, a. 343.

344. Where a defendant agrees to carry out compensatory work, he may, before or while carrying it out, pay part of the sums due to the collector with whom he has made the agreement.

The payment reduces the number of compensatory work hours to be carried out at the time of the agreement proportionately to the ratio between the amount paid and the amount of the sums due at the time of the agreement.

1987, c. 96, a. 344.

345. Even if the defendant ceases to carry out compensatory work before completing it, the amount of the sums due at the time of the agreement is reduced proportionately to the ratio between the number of hours already carried out or paid and the number of hours to be carried out at the time of the agreement.

1987, c. 96, a. 345.

345.1. Where a sentence in the form of a fine has been imposed on the defendant and the defendant makes payment of a sum due, carries out compensatory work or serves a term of imprisonment in default of payment, the sum, work or term of imprisonment is applied first to payment of the costs related to the fine.

When an agreement is made with the defendant, the collector shall, in respect of the judgments to be executed by the collector, see to it that the sums remitted and the work the defendant undertakes to perform serve to satisfy the judgment most likely to be the subject of an application for the issue of a warrant of committal against the defendant.

2003, c. 5, s. 19.

345.2. The collector shall, on the conditions prescribed by regulation, remit part of the costs recovered under this chapter to the prosecuting party referred to in paragraph 3 of article 9 who disbursed sums of money to prosecute.

2003, c. 5, s. 19.

DIVISION II PROVISIONS RELATING TO IMPRISONMENT IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF SUMS DUE

2003, c. 5, s. 19.

345.3. This division applies to the recovery of sums due pursuant to this Code, except sums to which Division III applies.

2003, c. 5, s. 19.

346. Where the defendant fails to honour his agreement to present himself to the collector, where it has not been possible to offer compensatory work or where the defendant refuses or neglects to carry out such work, and if the sums due have not been paid, the collector may apply to a judge for an order of imprisonment and a warrant of committal of the defendant.

Prior notice of the application shall be served on the defendant. The judge may, however, hear the application if it has not been possible to serve the prior notice on the defendant despite reasonable efforts to do so.

The collector shall, if the defendant is a person under 18 years of age, serve prior notice of the application on the person’s parents. If the parents have not been notified, the judge may proceed against the defendant or adjourn the hearing of the application on the conditions he determines, and order that prior notice be served on the parents.

1987, c. 96, a. 346; 1990, c. 4, s. 10.

347. The judge may order imprisonment and issue a warrant of committal if he is satisfied that the measures provided for in this chapter to recover the sums due do not permit, in this particular case, full recovery of the sums due. However, the judge may order imprisonment and issue the warrant only if he is satisfied that the defendant has, without a reasonable excuse, refused or neglected to pay those sums or settle them pursuant to this chapter.

The reasons for ordering imprisonment shall be given in writing.

1987, c. 96, a. 347; 2020, c. 12, s. 53.

348. In no case may the total term of imprisonment for the same offence exceed two years less one day.

1987, c. 96, a. 348; 1992, c. 61, s. 17; 1995, c. 51, s. 42.

349. Each sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of a sum due must be served without interruption.

1987, c. 96, a. 349.

350. Where a defendant is sentenced both to imprisonment and to payment of a sum of money, imprisonment in default of payment of the sum of money begins to run at the expiry of the term of imprisonment to which he was sentenced.

1987, c. 96, a. 350.

351. Where the defendant is already in detention, the judge, in imposing imprisonment in default of payment of sums due, shall order that the terms be served consecutively. Moreover, sentences of imprisonment imposed under this Code in default of payment of a sum due, where there is more than one sum due, must be served consecutively.

1987, c. 96, a. 351; 1995, c. 51, s. 43.

352. Every warrant of committal shall indicate the term of imprisonment.

1987, c. 96, a. 352.

353. A warrant may be issued and executed at any time. It may be executed anywhere in Québec by a peace officer or a bailiff.

Where a warrant of committal is not executed within five years of its issue, it is null. It may, however, be renewed before the expiry of that time by the judge who issued it or by a judge in the same judicial district.

1987, c. 96, a. 353.

354. The person who arrests a defendant under a warrant of committal shall

(1)  state his name and quality to the defendant;

(2)  inform the defendant of the grounds for his arrest;

(3)  allow the defendant to examine the warrant, or if it is not in his possession, promptly allow him to examine it;

(3.1)  if the arrest was made in a dwelling house under a warrant or telewarrant of entry, allow the defendant and, where applicable, the person in charge of the premises, to examine the warrant or telewarrant or, if it is not in his possession, promptly allow them to examine it;

(4)  inform the defendant of the amount due in the case of imprisonment in default of payment of a sum due.

The person shall not use more force than necessary.

1987, c. 96, a. 354; 2020, c. 12, s. 54.

355. To execute a warrant of committal, a person may enter any place where he has reasonable grounds to believe the defendant he has been ordered to arrest is to be found, in order to arrest him.

Before entering the place, he shall give a notice to a person in the place of his presence and of the purpose of his presence, unless he has reasonable grounds to believe that that would allow the defendant to abscond.

1987, c. 96, a. 355.

356. The person who arrests a defendant under a warrant of committal must deliver him into the custody of the director of the correctional facility indicated therein or the director of the correctional facility at the place of arrest.

If the defendant is under 18 years of age, he must be delivered into the custody of the director of youth protection having jurisdiction at the place of arrest.

The warrant of committal must be delivered as soon as possible to the person into whose custody the defendant is delivered. That person shall issue an attestation of the condition of the defendant when he receives him.

1987, c. 96, a. 356; 1995, c. 51, s. 44; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

357. A warrant of committal issued against a defendant while he is already in detention must be delivered without delay to the director of the facility where the defendant is detained.

If the defendant is a person under 18 years of age, the warrant must be delivered without delay to the director of youth protection having jurisdiction at the place of detention.

1987, c. 96, a. 357; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

358. The defendant may pay the sums due or part thereof to the person entrusted with the execution of a warrant of committal. The person shall give a receipt to the defendant as evidence of payment and remit the amount paid to the collector.

Payment in full of the sums due suspends execution of the warrant.

1987, c. 96, a. 358.

359. The defendant may, before beginning his term of imprisonment, pay to the director of the facility where he has been conveyed the full amount of the sums due.

1987, c. 96, a. 359; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

360. A defendant who is in detention may, during his term of imprisonment, pay to the director of the facility where he is detained the balance of the sums due.

The amount of the sums due at the time of imprisonment is then reduced proportionately to the ratio between the number of days of imprisonment already served or paid and the number of days of imprisonment to be served at the time of imprisonment.

1987, c. 96, a. 360; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

361. The defendant may at the time of or during imprisonment pay part of the sums due to the director of the facility where he is detained.

Payment under the first paragraph reduces the number of days of imprisonment to be served at the time of imprisonment proportionately to the ratio between the amount paid and the amount of the sums due at the time of imprisonment.

1987, c. 96, a. 361; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

362. The director of the facility who receives a sum due must give a receipt to the defendant as evidence of payment of the sum and remit the amount to the collector.

In addition, the director must release the defendant from custody if he has made full payment of the sums due, unless his detention is required on another ground.

1987, c. 96, a. 362; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

DIVISION III SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO TRAFFIC AND PARKING OFFENCES

2003, c. 5, s. 20.

363. This division applies to the recovery of sums due for offences under the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) or a traffic or parking by-law adopted by a municipality.

In this division, if the collector has given a notice under article 364, the sums due also include the amount fixed under subparagraph 52 of the first paragraph of section 621 of the Highway Safety Code

1987, c. 96, a. 363; 1992, c. 61, s. 18; 2003, c. 5, s. 20; 2009, c. 26, s. 25.

364. Where a defendant has not paid the sum due at the expiration of the time provided for in article 322 or agreed under article 327 or 328, or where, at the expiration of such time, although the defendant had agreed to do compensatory work, the defendant has failed to honour the agreement, the collector shall notify the Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec of that fact so that the Société may, in accordance with the Highway Safety Code (chapter C‐24.2),

(1)  suspend the defendant’s learner’s licence, probationary licence or driver’s licence or, if the defendant is not a licence holder, suspend the defendant’s right to obtain any such licence;

(2)  prohibit any road vehicle registered in the defendant’s name from being put into operation or put back into operation;

(3)  prohibit any road vehicle registered in the defendant’s name from being discarded;

(4)  refuse to register any road vehicle in the defendant’s name;

(5)  refuse, on the transfer of the right of ownership of a road vehicle registered in the defendant’s name, to effect a new registration in the name of the transferee or his or her successors.

The fact that the collector gives the notice does not prevent the collector from using other recovery measures provided for in this chapter.

1987, c. 96, a. 364; 1990, c. 19, s. 11; 1995, c. 51, s. 45; 2003, c. 5, s. 21.

365. The collector, if he has given a notice under article 364, shall notify the Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec without delay if the sum due has been acquitted as a result of a payment or seizure or if the defendant has been released from payment under the second paragraph of article 339.

1987, c. 96, a. 365; 1990, c. 19, s. 11; 2003, c. 5, s. 22.

366. Any person who deliberately attempts to avoid payment of the sums the person owes, in particular by refusing the various terms and conditions offered for payment of the sums due, by failing to honour the person’s agreement to appear before the collector, by refusing or neglecting to carry out compensatory work or by rendering himself or herself insolvent, is guilty of an offence and is liable to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years less one day.

Proceedings under this article may be instituted only by the Attorney General or by the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions before the Court of Québec or a municipal court.

Proceedings under this article are prescribed one year from the date the commission of the offence becomes known to the prosecutor. However, no proceedings may be instituted if more than five years have elapsed since the date the offence was committed.

The sentence imposed for this offence does not discharge the defendant from payment of the sums due. Payment of the sums due does not discharge the defendant from the requirement to serve the sentence of imprisonment.

The collector is deemed, for the purposes of this article, to be a person entrusted with the enforcement of any Act within the meaning of article 62.

1987, c. 96, a. 366; 2003, c. 5, s. 23; 2005, c. 34, s. 86.

366.1. Notwithstanding article 242, sentences of imprisonment imposed pursuant to article 366 may not be served intermittently.

2003, c. 5, s. 24.

366.2. No penal proceedings under article 366 shall be instituted against a person under 18 years of age.

2003, c. 5, s. 24.

CHAPTER XIV REGULATIONS

367. The Government may, by regulation,

(1)  prescribe the form of statements of offence and offence reports, which may vary according to the offence;

(1.1)  (paragraph repealed);

(2)  fix the court fees payable under this Code;

(3)  fix the costs that may be awarded against a party in first instance or in appeal;

(4)  fix the fee exigible for the issue of a copy of a thing seized or document;

(5)  determine the obligations of a person who receives security while awaiting its disposition pursuant to this Code;

(6)  fix, for the purposes of the security contemplated in article 76, the amount of costs added to the amount of the minimum fine;

(7)  fix the allowances payable to witnesses;

(8)  fix the amount of costs that may be awarded against a defaulting witness;

(9)  fix the amount of costs that may be imposed upon dismissal of an application for rectification of judgment or reduction of costs or upon the granting or dismissal of an application for revocation of a judgment addressed by the defendant;

(10)  fix the costs for an application for judicial review or habeas corpus proceedings;

(11)  fix the costs of execution of the judgment that may be awarded against a party;

(12)  determine the conditions on which part of the costs recovered may be remitted to the prosecutor under article 345.2;

(13)  determine the tariff of fees of any person entrusted with the administration of this Code in respect of judicial proceedings;

(14)  determine the costs and fees payable under paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 8 to 11 and 13 which apply to a person under 18 years of age, the amounts payable by such a person and the costs and fees from which he is exempted.

1987, c. 96, a. 367; 1992, c. 61, s. 19; 1995, c. 51, s. 46; 2001, c. 32, s. 98; 2003, c. 5, s. 25; 2014, c. 1, s. 779.

367.1. The Minister of Justice may, by regulation, determine the offences or classes of offences for which a proceeding rules adaptation program within the meaning of article 159.1 and a judgment execution rules adaptation program within the meaning of the second paragraph of article 333 may be implemented. The Minister may also determine the offences and classes of offences for which an application may be made for a revocation of judgment under the second paragraph of article 257.

2020, c. 12, s. 55.

368. The judges of the Court of Appeal, the Superior Court or the Court of Québec may adopt, for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, the regulations judged necessary for the proper carrying out of this Code.

The regulations of the Court of Appeal and the Superior Court must be adopted by a majority of the judges concerned, either at a meeting convened for the purpose by the chief justice or upon consultation held with the judges at the request of the chief justice using the most appropriate means of consultation, as determined by the chief justice.

The regulations come into force fifteen days after their date of publication in the Gazette officielle du Québec.

In the case of the Court of Québec, the regulations are made and come into force in accordance with the provisions of the Courts of Justice Act (chapter T-16).

1987, c. 96, a. 368; 1988, c. 21, s. 149; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP); 2017, c. 18, s. 93; 2020, c. 12, s. 56.

368.1. After considering the effects of a pilot project on the rights of individuals and obtaining the agreement of the Chief Justice of Québec or the Chief Justice of the Superior Court or the Chief Judge of the Court of Québec, according to their jurisdiction, and after consulting the Barreau du Québec and, if applicable, the Chambre des huissiers de justice du Québec, the Minister of Justice may, by regulation, modify a rule of procedure or introduce a new one for the period determined by the Minister, which period may not exceed three years, for the purposes of such a project conducted in the judicial districts specified by the Minister.

2020, c. 12, s. 57.

368.2. In a state of emergency declared by the Government or in a situation where it is impossible in fact to comply with the rules of this Code or to use a means of communication, the Chief Justice of Québec and the Minister of Justice may jointly suspend or extend a prescription or procedural period for a specified time, or authorize the use of another means of communication in the manner they specify.

Their decision takes effect immediately, and must be published without delay in the Gazette officielle du Québec.

2020, c. 12, s. 57.

CHAPTER XV TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

369. The Minister of Justice is responsible for the carrying out of this Code.

1987, c. 96, a. 369; 1990, c. 4, s. 11.

370. The powers and duties conferred upon or assigned to a judge under articles 3 and 368 of this Code may also be exercised by the Labour Court within the limits of its jurisdiction as provided by law until, pursuant to chapter 26 of the statutes of 2001, it ceases to exercise penal jurisdiction.

1987, c. 96, a. 370; 1990, c. 4, s. 11; 2001, c. 26, s. 93.

371. Article 340 of this Code is deemed to refer to the Act respecting building contractors vocational qualifications (chapter Q-1) until such time as section 214 of the Building Act (1985, chapter 34) comes into force.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

372. Until 31 October 1993, the following provisions apply to proceedings governed by this Code:

(1)  Any person may lay an information unless the law constituting the offence requires a special authorization.

The informant must have reasonable grounds to believe that the offence in respect of which he laid the information has been committed.

(2)  The information shall be laid in writing and shall contain no reference to any previous conviction.

(3)  Unless otherwise provided by law, the information must be laid

(a)  within two years from the date of commission of the offence where, by law, the fine belongs solely to the State;

(b)  by a prosecutor other than the Attorney General, within one year from the date of commission of the offence, where, by law, the fine belongs to the State or to another prosecutor;

(c)  by the Attorney General within two years from expiration of the period prescribed in subparagraph b, where, by law, the fine belongs to the State or to another prosecutor and the latter did not lay the information within the prescribed time.

(4)  The information shall be laid before a judge. The judge shall hear the allegations of the prosecutor and may hear the evidence, under oath, of any witnesses and shall have, for that purpose, the power to procure the attendance of witnesses and to compel them to testify, in accordance with the provisions of this Code.

The judge shall issue a summons if he has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed.

(5)  The summons shall not be signed in blank.

It shall be served upon the defendant and shall require him to appear at the time and place specified therein.

Except in case of a parking offence, a copy of a summons addressed to a person under 18 years of age shall be served on his parents.

(6)  An information may, should the prosecutor so choose, be heard, tried and adjudged in the judicial district where the defendant

(a)  allegedly committed the offence, according to the information;

(b)  has his residence or has its head office or one of its places of business;

(c)  is in detention, where such is the case.

Such information may also, with the consent of the defendant, be heard, tried and adjudged in any other judicial district.

(7)  The notice of summons or infraction or the summons issued under articles 1129b and 1140 of the Charter of the city of Montréal (1959-1960, chapter 102), article 546b of the Charter of the city of Québec (1929, chapter 25) or paragraph 17 of section 426 of the Cities and Towns Act (Revised Statutes, 1964, chapter 193), as replaced for Ville de Hull, has the same value and effect as evidence given under oath by the person who has witnessed the commission of the offence alleged on the notice of summons or infraction or the summons.

(8)  In no case shall a greater penalty be imposed upon a defendant by reason of a previous conviction unless the prosecutor notified him, before the plea was made, that a greater penalty would be sought by reason of the previous conviction.

Proof of a previous conviction and of the transmission of the notice is incumbent upon the prosecutor, and shall not be brought forth until after the defendant is convicted.

(9)  The collector shall remit part of the costs to the prosecutor who has borne expenses related to the prosecution to the extent prescribed by regulation.

The Government may, by regulation, determine the costs which may be remitted to the prosecutor under the first paragraph.

(10)  Where it is alleged that the defendant has not complied with his obligation, under an Act, to hold a certificate, licence, permit or any other authorization required by the Act, it shall be incumbent upon the defendant to establish that he is the holder of such a certificate, licence, permit or other authorization.

(11)  A judge having jurisdiction to issue a search warrant under Chapter III of this Code has jurisdiction to exercise the powers conferred on a judge in paragraphs 12 and 13 of this article.

(12)  The clerk or any other person whom the judge designates after receiving a written application therefor shall have custody of the thing seized pursuant to a search warrant or telewarrant. However, where a seizure was made without a warrant, the seizor shall have custody of the thing he has seized until such time as it is produced as evidence in proceedings or disposed of according to law.

(13)  A thing seized during a search shall not be detained for a period exceeding 90 days, unless an information following the seizure is laid prior to the expiry of such period. However, the judge may order that the detention period be extended for not more than 90 days.

If no information is laid prior to the expiry of the period prescribed in the first paragraph or as soon as it becomes no longer necessary to detain the seized thing, the judge, upon application to him therefor in writing, shall order that the thing be returned to the person entitled thereto or, as the case may be, order that it be forfeited. If no application is made within the ensuing 24 months, the thing seized shall be forfeited pleno jure.

An order for the disposal or forfeiture of the thing seized shall not be executory until 30 days after such order was made, except where the parties renounce that period.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1996, c. 2, s. 217; 1999, c. 40, s. 57.

373. Until 31 October 1993, the following substitutions shall be made:

(1)  for the words “statement of offence” in the first and second lines of article 64, the word “information”;

(2)  for the words “the person who issued the statement of offence in the name of the prosecutor and whose name appears on the statement of offence or offence report” in paragraph 1 of article 71, the words “the person who signed the information and the person who wrote the offence report”;

(3)  for the words “statement of offence” in the third and fourth lines of the first paragraph of article 72, the words “summons, an infraction ticket contemplated in section 574 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) or any similar ticket or notice provided for by any other Act”;

(4)  for the words “statement of offence” in the second line of the first paragraph of article 76, the words “summons, ticket or notice referred to in article 72”;

(5)  for the word “statement” in the second line of the second paragraph of article 76, the words “summons, ticket or notice”;

(6)  for the words “statement of offence” in the fourth line of the first paragraph of article 77, the words “summons, ticket or notice referred to in article 72”;

(7)  for the words “statement of offence” in the first line of article 150, the word “information”;

(8)  for the words “a statement of offence” in the first line of paragraph 6 of article 174, the words “an information”;

(9)  for the word “statement” in the second line of paragraph 6 of article 174, the word “information”;

(10)  for the words “a statement of offence” in the third line of article 181, the words “an information”;

(11)  for the words “statements of offence” in the third line of article 182, the word “informations”;

(12)  for the words “statement of offence” in the second line of subparagraph 1 of the first paragraph of article 184, the word “information”;

(13)  for the words “statement of offence” in the second line of the second paragraph of article 184, the word “information”;

(14)  for the words “or the statement of offence is amended may be required to pay a greater amount of costs than he would have been required to pay if he had entered such a plea within the time indicated in the statement of offence” in the second, third, fourth and fifth lines of article 186, the words “is amended may be required to pay a greater amount of costs than he would have been required to pay had he entered such plea before his appearance upon summons”;

(15)  for the words “statement of offence” in the second line of article 198, the word “summons”;

(16)  for the word “statement” in the fifth line of article 198, the word “duplicate”;

(17)  for the words “a statement of offence” in the first line of article 220, the words “an information”.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

374. (Omitted).

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

375. Every order, decree or regulation made by the Government or by another competent authority under any provision which has been amended, replaced or repealed under the Act to amend various legislative provisions respecting the implementation of the Code of Penal Procedure (1990, chapter 4) or the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61) remains in force to the extent that it is consistent with this Code and until such time as it is replaced or repealed.

The same rule applies to court regulations until they are replaced or repealed in accordance with this Code.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1992, c. 61, s. 20; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).

376. All provisions of the charters, letters patent, by-laws, resolutions and ordinances of the local municipalities which are inconsistent with those provisions of this Code which are in force are null.

All provisions of any Act governing a local municipality with respect to proceedings by means of a notice of summons which do not constitute a power to make by-laws and which are repealed by a provision of the Act to amend various legislative provisions respecting the implementation of the Code of Penal Procedure (1990, chapter 4), shall continue to have effect as if they were by-laws adopted by the council, until they are repealed or replaced or until 31 October 1993 at the latest. The same rule applies to by-laws adopted under any such provision which has been repealed, when that provision constitutes a power to make by-laws.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1992, c. 61, s. 21; 2000, c. 56, s. 123.

377. Every act performed and every decision made under any provision amended, replaced or repealed by the Act to amend various legislative provisions respecting the implementation of the Code Penal Procedure (1990, chapter 4) or by the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61) retains its effect if it continues to serve a useful purpose. Where it so continues to do, it is deemed to have been performed or made pursuant to the corresponding provisions of this Code.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1992, c. 61, s. 22.

378. Every act begun before 1 October 1990 which did not conflict with any provision amended, replaced or repealed by the Act to amend various legislative provisions respecting the implementation of the Code of Penal Procedure (1990, chapter 4) is continued, unless otherwise specially provided by law, in accordance with this Code, unless it is impossible so to perform it, in which case it is continued under its enabling provision if that is consistent with this Code.

Every act begun before 1 November 1993 which did not conflict with any provision amended, replaced or repealed by the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61) is continued, unless otherwise specially provided, in accordance with this Code.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1992, c. 61, s. 23.

379. Every pleading drawn up in accordance with a provision amended, replaced or repealed under the Act to amend various legislative provisions respecting the implementation of the Code of Penal Procedure (1990, chapter 4) before 1 October 1990 is valid until such time as the object of the pleading is achieved.

The same applies to every pleading drawn up before 1 November 1993 which did not conflict with any provision amended, replaced or repealed under the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61).

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1992, c. 61, s. 24.

380. Every warrant to procure the attendance of a witness issued under a provision of the Summary Convictions Act (chapter P-15) is renewable under article 45 of this Code not later than 1 October 1991.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

381. Every search warrant issued under a special provision of law or of the Summary Convictions Act (chapter P-15) remains valid but, unless specially provided by law, the search must be carried out in accordance with the corresponding provisions of this Code.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

382. Every warrant of imprisonment issued under a special provision of law or of the Summary Convictions Act (chapter P-15) is renewable in accordance with article 353 of this Code.

A warrant issued before 1 October 1986 may be renewed not later than 1 October 1991.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

383. All applications made and all proceedings tried in first instance are continued in accordance with the corresponding provisions of this Code, unless otherwise specially provided by law.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

384. The provisions respecting rectification and revocation of judgment and respecting appeal apply to decisions or judgments rendered before 1 October 1990.

Appeals are continued in accordance with this Code, unless otherwise specially provided by law.

1990, c. 4, s. 11.

385. The execution of any judgment commenced under the Summary Convictions Act (chapter P-15) shall be continued in accordance with the corresponding provisions of this Code. However, where imprisonment has been imposed for failure to pay the fine under section 56.1 of the Summary Convictions Act, the director of the correctional facility may also offer the defendant the option of paying the sums due by way of compensatory work if any is available.

Every prison sentence imposed under any provision of an Act which has been amended, replaced or repealed by the Act to amend various legislative provisions respecting the implementation of the Code of Penal Procedure (1990, chapter 4) remains in force and shall be carried out.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 2002, c. 24, s. 209.

386. A prosecutor whose right to prosecute has been repealed or replaced under the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61) may continue, in accordance with this Code, penal proceedings already begun, until final judgment is rendered.

1990, c. 4, s. 11; 1992, c. 61, s. 25.

387. Where a person wishes to institute penal proceedings under paragraph 3 of article 9 and article 10 of this Code, he shall apply to a judge for authorization, even though the person previously obtained another authorization required under a legislative provision amended, replaced or repealed by the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61).

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

388. The rules governing the prescription of penal proceedings provided in this Code or under the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61) apply even to an offence committed before 1 November 1993, unless the proceedings have already been instituted.

However, penal proceedings which, on 1 November 1993 or within the following six months, would have been prescribed under a provision amended, replaced or repealed by the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions remain subject to the prescription period provided in such provision.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

389. Where, before 1 November 1993, a person has custody of a thing seized, he shall continue to assume custody thereof until the thing is disposed of in accordance with the law, unless it is submitted in evidence in which case, except where otherwise specially provided by law, the clerk becomes the custodian of the thing.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

390. The following written proceedings remain valid if they were issued before 1 November 1993:

(1)  informations and summons;

(2)  prior, preliminary or summary notices;

(3)  notices of summons or offence or infraction tickets;

(4)  48-hour notices issued under sections 577 and 578 of the Highway Safety Code (chapter C-24.2) or section 79 of the Act respecting transportation by taxi (chapter T-11.1), or 72-hour notices issued under section 90 of the Act respecting truck transportation (chapter C-5.1) or section 77.1 of the Transport Act (chapter T-12);

(5)  notices of mechanical inspection issued under sections 524 and 531 of the Highway Safety Code.

However, if, on that date, prosecution has not begun, a statement of offence must be served before prosecution may begin.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

391. Any summons, notice of summons or other written proceeding under which a defendant has been summoned to appear is equivalent to a statement of offence on the date fixed for the first appearance before a judge, where the prosecutor requests only the minimum sentence prescribed by law and the written proceeding indicates such sentence.

Payments in full discharge prescribed by any Act or regulation constitute a minimum sentence.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

392. Any defendant who appears upon summons shall, subject to articles 393 and 394, enter a plea of guilty or not guilty.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

393. At the time of the appearance, the judge may allow

(1)  that a statement of offence be served forthwith on the defendant, where the sentence requested by the prosecutor is not indicated on the notice of summons or on the summons or where the prosecutor intends to request a greater sentence than the minimum sentence prescribed by law; or

(2)  that the prosecutor serve forthwith on the defendant and file in the court’s record a document including any additional information required to cause the notice of summons or the summons to be equivalent to a statement of offence.

The request for sentence need not be entered in a separate section of the notice of summons or summons, if the prosecutor requests only the minimum sentence.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

394. The judge shall give every defendant on whom a statement of offence or its equivalent referred to in subparagraph 2 of the first paragraph of article 393 is served an opportunity to plead guilty or not guilty. However, the defendant is entitled to a period of 30 days before entering his plea.

If the defendant pleads guilty at the time of appearance, the judge shall convict him of the offence and impose a sentence on him within the limits prescribed by law. If the defendant pleads not guilty, the judge shall set a date for the trial.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

395. The hearing of a preliminary application or the trial of a case which is pending, in first instance or in appeal, begun before 1 November 1993, may be continued and the written proceeding which instituted the proceedings need not be replaced by a statement of offence.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

396. Written proceedings introductive of suit need not be replaced by a statement of offence to allow judgments, even judgments by default, to be rendered.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

397. When rendering judgment, the judge may issue an order for the disposal of things seized at the time of an inspection or search carried out before 1 November 1993.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

398. Where notice must be given within 30 days after 1 November 1993 under a provision amended or replaced by the Act respecting the implementation of certain provisions of the Code of Penal Procedure and amending various legislative provisions (1992, chapter 61) prior to the judgment to a person by reason of an order issued at the time of the judgment, the judge shall grant, without costs, the application for adjournment necessary to permit that such notice be given.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

399. Article 230 of this Code applies only in the case of proceedings in respect of which no judgment has been rendered on 1 November 1993.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

400. Provisions relating to the reduction of costs apply even in respect of judgments rendered before 1 November 1993.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

401. Warrants of arrest issued under article 326 of this Code in the year preceding 1 November 1993 are valid for a period of two years from their date of issue without the need for renewal.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

402. Any portion of a term of imprisonment to which the second sentence of the first paragraph of article 348 of this Code applies is cancelled on 1 November 1993 even if the defendant has begun to serve his sentence.

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

403. (Omitted).

1992, c. 61, s. 25.

SCHEDULE

(Article 336)

DETERMINATION OF THE EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE AMOUNT OF THE SUMS DUE AND THE DURATION OF COMPENSATORY WORK

For the portion of the                  One hour of
sums due between:                    compensatory work
                                     is equivalent to:

     $1 and    $500:                       $10
   $501 and  $5 000:                       $20
 $5 001 and $10 000:                       $40
$10 001 and $15 000:                       $60
$15 001 and $20 000:                       $80
$20 001 and $25 000:                      $100
$25 001 and $30 000:                      $120
$30 001 and $35 000:                      $140
$35 001 and $40 000:                      $160
$40 001 and $45 000:                      $180
$45 001 and $50 000:                      $200
$50 001 and over:                         $320.

1987, c. 96, schedule; 1995, c. 51, s. 48.

REPEAL SCHEDULES

In accordance with section 9 of the Act respecting the consolidation of the statutes and regulations (chapter R-3), chapter 96 of the statutes of 1987, in force on 1 March 1991, is repealed, except article 386, effective from the coming into force of chapter C-25.1 of the Revised Statutes.

In accordance with section 9 of the Act respecting the consolidation of the statutes and regulations (chapter R-3), articles 8 to 16, the third paragraph of article 55, the third paragraph of article 66, paragraph 2 (part) of article 71, article 87, the second paragraph of article 90, articles 91, 129 to 142, 144 to 146, the first and the third paragraphs of article 147, articles 148, 149, 156 to 168, the third paragraph of article 169, paragraph 5 of article 174, article 180, paragraph 4 of the first paragraph of article 184, article 185 (part), the first paragraph of article 187, article 188, the first and the third paragraphs of article 222, articles 230 and 261, the first paragraph of article 262, articles 263 and 264, paragraph 6 (part) of article 266, articles 268 (part), 291 (part), 363 and 366 of chapter 96 of the statutes of 1987, in force on 1 September 1994, are repealed effective from the coming into force of the updating to 1 September 1994 of chapter C-25.1 of the Revised Statutes.

In accordance with section 9 of the Act respecting the consolidation of the statutes and regulations (chapter R-3), the second paragraph of article 187, the second sentence in the second paragraph of article 244, the second paragraph of article 250, the second paragraph of article 257, the second paragraph of article 262, the second paragraph of article 270, article 294 (part) and the second paragraph of article 316 of chapter 96 of the statutes of 1987, in force on 1 March 1997, are repealed effective from the coming into force of the updating to 1 March 1997 of chapter C-25.1 of the Revised Statutes.