I-3 - Taxation Act

Full text
1129.2. Any corporation that is deemed, under section 1029.8.35, to have paid to the Minister an amount as partial payment of its tax payable for any given taxation year under Part I, in respect of a property that is a Québec film production, shall pay tax, for a particular taxation year, equal to the aggregate of
(a)  the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount it is deemed, under the said section 1029.8.35, to have so paid to the Minister in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is tax the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, where
i.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a Québec film production by reason of the fact that the favourable advance ruling issued by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles in respect of the property, ceases to be in force at that time and that no certificate is issued by the Société in respect of the property, or of the fact that the certificate issued by the Société in respect of the property is revoked at that time, or
ii.  the particular year is the first year for which subparagraph b of the third paragraph of section 1029.8.35 applies in respect of the property or, where applicable, would have been such first year had the qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure of the corporation for the particular year in respect of the property not been nil;
(a.1)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property nor have been in any preceding taxation year and the corporation ceases in the particular year to be recognized as a qualified corporation not dealing at arm’s length with another corporation that holds a broadcasting licence issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes in the particular year the qualification certificate referred to in paragraph a.3 of the definition of “qualified corporation” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34 that was issued to the corporation, for any given taxation year, the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35 in respect of the property for the given taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for the given taxation year; and
(b)  (subparagraph repealed);
(c)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a or in subparagraph a.1 are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property and the situations described in those subparagraphs i and ii have not been encountered in any preceding taxation year, the amount determined in respect of the corporation under the second paragraph in cases where
i.  in computing the amount determined under subparagraph ii of paragraph a or subparagraph i of paragraph b of the definitions of “qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure”, “qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area” and “qualified labour expenditure” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34, government assistance or non-government assistance that the corporation, another person or a partnership has received, is entitled to receive or may reasonably expect to receive, on or before the corporation’s filing-due date for the particular year must be taken into account, for or from the particular year in respect of the property, and the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation in a taxation year preceding the particular year,
ii.  an amount relating to an expenditure included in a qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure in respect of the property, or relating to production costs directly attributable to the production of the property, other than an amount of assistance to which subparagraph i applies, is, during the particular taxation year, directly or indirectly, refunded or otherwise paid to the corporation or allocated to a payment to be made by the corporation,
iii.  the corporation ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a regional corporation by reason of the fact that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation for any year and certifying that it qualifies for the purposes of subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35,
iv.  an amount relating to an expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to services rendered in any year outside the Montréal area in relation to a regional production, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property,
v.  an amount relating to a computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to an amount paid in any year for activities related to computer-aided special effects and animation, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, or
vi.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a production that receives no amount of financial assistance granted by a public body because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation in respect of the property for the purposes of subparagraph c of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, or assistance referred to in any of subparagraphs ii to viii.3 of subparagraph c of the second paragraph of section 1029.6.0.0.1 is granted, in the particular year, in respect of the property;
(d)  (subparagraph repealed).
The amount to which subparagraph c of the first paragraph refers, in respect of a property, is equal, for the corporation, to the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of
(a)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation would have been deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, if
i.  where subparagraph i of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the assistance referred to in that subparagraph i had been received by the corporation, the other person or the partnership in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation,
ii.  where subparagraph ii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, any amount referred to in that subparagraph ii had been refunded, paid or allocated in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the amount is attributable were incurred,
iii.  where subparagraph iii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister under subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, had been equal to zero for the taxation year in respect of which the certificate is revoked,
iv.  where subparagraph iv or v of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount had not been indicated for the year referred to in any of those subparagraphs on the document that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles had then enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, and
v.  where subparagraph vi of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister in respect of the property under subparagraph c of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35 had been equal to zero for a taxation year preceding the particular year; and
(b)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part, in respect of the property, for a taxation year preceding the particular year.
Furthermore, where applicable, the corporation that controls, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever, the corporation referred to in the first paragraph is liable, solidarily with that corporation, for payment of the tax under the first paragraph.
1992, c. 1, s. 204; 1994, c. 21, s. 50; 1995, c. 1, s. 199; 1997, c. 3, s. 71; 1997, c. 14, s. 263; 1997, c. 31, s. 133; 1997, c. 85, s. 301; 1999, c. 83, s. 242; 2000, c. 39, s. 229; 2001, c. 51, s. 212; 2005, c. 23, s. 241; 2005, c. 38, s. 307; 2007, c. 12, s. 236; 2009, c. 15, s. 384; 2010, c. 5, s. 191; 2010, c. 25, s. 200; 2011, c. 1, s. 107.
1129.2. Any corporation that is deemed, under section 1029.8.35, to have paid to the Minister an amount as partial payment of its tax payable for any given taxation year under Part I, in respect of a property that is a Québec film production, shall pay tax, for a particular taxation year, equal to the aggregate of
(a)  the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount it is deemed, under the said section 1029.8.35, to have so paid to the Minister in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is tax the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, where
i.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a Québec film production by reason of the fact that the favourable advance ruling issued by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles in respect of the property, ceases to be in force at that time and that no certificate is issued by the Société in respect of the property, or of the fact that the certificate issued by the Société in respect of the property is revoked at that time, or
ii.  the particular year is the first year for which subparagraph b of the third paragraph of section 1029.8.35 applies in respect of the property or, where applicable, would have been such first year had the qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure of the corporation for the particular year in respect of the property not been nil;
(a.1)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property nor have been in any preceding taxation year and the corporation ceases in the particular year to be recognized as a qualified corporation not dealing at arm’s length with another corporation that holds a broadcasting licence issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes in the particular year the qualification certificate referred to in paragraph a.3 of the definition of “qualified corporation” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34 that was issued to the corporation, for any given taxation year, the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35 in respect of the property for the given taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for the given taxation year; and
(b)  (subparagraph repealed);
(c)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a or in subparagraph a.1 are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property and the situations described in those subparagraphs i and ii have not been encountered in any preceding taxation year, the amount determined in respect of the corporation under the second paragraph in cases where
i.  in computing the amount determined under subparagraph ii of paragraph a or subparagraph i of paragraph b of the definitions of “qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure”, “qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area” and “qualified labour expenditure” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34, government assistance or non-government assistance that the corporation, another person or a partnership has received, is entitled to receive or may reasonably expect to receive, on or before the corporation’s filing-due date for the particular year must be taken into account, for or from the particular year in respect of the property, and the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation in a taxation year preceding the particular year,
ii.  an amount relating to an expenditure included in a qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure in respect of the property, or relating to production costs directly attributable to the production of the property, other than an amount of assistance to which subparagraph i applies, is, during the particular taxation year, directly or indirectly, refunded or otherwise paid to the corporation or allocated to a payment to be made by the corporation,
iii.  the corporation ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a regional corporation by reason of the fact that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation for any year and certifying that it qualifies for the purposes of subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35,
iv.  an amount relating to an expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to services rendered in any year outside the Montréal area in relation to a regional production, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property,
v.  an amount relating to a computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to an amount paid in any year for activities related to computer-aided special effects and animation, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, or
vi.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a production that receives no amount of financial assistance granted by a public body because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation in respect of the property for the purposes of subparagraph c of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, or assistance referred to in any of subparagraphs ii to viii.1 of subparagraph c of the second paragraph of section 1029.6.0.0.1 is granted, in the particular year, in respect of the property;
(d)  (subparagraph repealed).
The amount to which subparagraph c of the first paragraph refers, in respect of a property, is equal, for the corporation, to the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of
(a)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation would have been deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, if
i.  where subparagraph i of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the assistance referred to in that subparagraph i had been received by the corporation, the other person or the partnership in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation,
ii.  where subparagraph ii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, any amount referred to in that subparagraph ii had been refunded, paid or allocated in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the amount is attributable were incurred,
iii.  where subparagraph iii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister under subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, had been equal to zero for the taxation year in respect of which the certificate is revoked,
iv.  where subparagraph iv or v of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount had not been indicated for the year referred to in any of those subparagraphs on the document that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles had then enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, and
v.  where subparagraph vi of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister in respect of the property under subparagraph c of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35 had been equal to zero for a taxation year preceding the particular year; and
(b)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part, in respect of the property, for a taxation year preceding the particular year.
Furthermore, where applicable, the corporation that controls, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever, the corporation referred to in the first paragraph is liable, solidarily with that corporation, for payment of the tax under the first paragraph.
1992, c. 1, s. 204; 1994, c. 21, s. 50; 1995, c. 1, s. 199; 1997, c. 3, s. 71; 1997, c. 14, s. 263; 1997, c. 31, s. 133; 1997, c. 85, s. 301; 1999, c. 83, s. 242; 2000, c. 39, s. 229; 2001, c. 51, s. 212; 2005, c. 23, s. 241; 2005, c. 38, s. 307; 2007, c. 12, s. 236; 2009, c. 15, s. 384; 2010, c. 5, s. 191; 2010, c. 25, s. 200.
1129.2. Any corporation that is deemed, under section 1029.8.35, to have paid to the Minister an amount as partial payment of its tax payable for any given taxation year under Part I, in respect of a property that is a Québec film production, shall pay tax, for a particular taxation year, equal to the aggregate of
(a)  the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount it is deemed, under the said section 1029.8.35, to have so paid to the Minister in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is tax the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, where
i.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a Québec film production by reason of the fact that the favourable advance ruling issued by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles in respect of the property, ceases to be in force at that time and that no certificate is issued by the Société in respect of the property, or of the fact that the certificate issued by the Société in respect of the property is revoked at that time, or
ii.  the particular year is the first year for which subparagraph b of the third paragraph of section 1029.8.35 applies in respect of the property or, where applicable, would have been such first year had the qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure of the corporation for the particular year in respect of the property not been nil;
(a.1)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property nor have been in any preceding taxation year and the corporation ceases in the particular year to be recognized as a qualified corporation not dealing at arm’s length with another corporation that holds a broadcasting licence issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes in the particular year the qualification certificate referred to in paragraph a.3 of the definition of “qualified corporation” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34 that was issued to the corporation, for any given taxation year, the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35 in respect of the property for the given taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for the given taxation year; and
(b)  (subparagraph repealed);
(c)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a or in subparagraph a.1 are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property and the situations described in those subparagraphs i and ii have not been encountered in any preceding taxation year, the amount determined in respect of the corporation under the second paragraph in cases where
i.  in computing the amount determined under subparagraph ii of paragraph a or subparagraph i of paragraph b of the definitions of “qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure”, “qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area” and “qualified labour expenditure” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34, government assistance or non-government assistance that the corporation, another person, within the meaning of section 1, or a partnership has received, is entitled to receive or may reasonably expect to receive, on or before the corporation’s filing-due date for the particular year must be taken into account, for or from the particular year in respect of the property, and the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation in a taxation year preceding the particular year,
ii.  an amount relating to an expenditure included in a qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure in respect of the property, or relating to production costs directly attributable to the production of the property, other than an amount of assistance to which subparagraph i applies, is, during the particular taxation year, directly or indirectly, refunded or otherwise paid to the corporation or allocated to a payment to be made by the corporation,
iii.  the corporation ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a regional corporation by reason of the fact that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation for any year and certifying that it qualifies for the purposes of subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35,
iv.  an amount relating to an expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to services rendered in any year outside the Montréal area in relation to a regional production, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property,
v.  an amount relating to a computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to an amount paid in any year for activities related to computer-aided special effects and animation, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, or
vi.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a production that receives no amount of financial assistance granted by a public body because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation in respect of the property for the purposes of subparagraph c of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, or assistance referred to in any of subparagraphs ii to viii.1 of subparagraph c of the second paragraph of section 1029.6.0.0.1 is granted, in the particular year, in respect of the property;
(d)  (subparagraph repealed).
The amount to which subparagraph c of the first paragraph refers, in respect of a property, is equal, for the corporation, to the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of
(a)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation would have been deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, if
i.  where subparagraph i of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the assistance referred to in that subparagraph i had been received by the corporation, the other person or the partnership in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation,
ii.  where subparagraph ii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, any amount referred to in that subparagraph ii had been refunded, paid or allocated in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the amount is attributable were incurred,
iii.  where subparagraph iii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister under subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, had been equal to zero for the taxation year in respect of which the certificate is revoked,
iv.  where subparagraph iv or v of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount had not been indicated for the year referred to in any of those subparagraphs on the document that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles had then enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, and
v.  where subparagraph vi of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister in respect of the property under subparagraph c of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35 had been equal to zero for a taxation year preceding the particular year; and
(b)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part, in respect of the property, for a taxation year preceding the particular year.
Furthermore, where applicable, the corporation that controls, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever, the corporation referred to in the first paragraph is liable, solidarily with that corporation, for payment of the tax under the first paragraph.
1992, c. 1, s. 204; 1994, c. 21, s. 50; 1995, c. 1, s. 199; 1997, c. 3, s. 71; 1997, c. 14, s. 263; 1997, c. 31, s. 133; 1997, c. 85, s. 301; 1999, c. 83, s. 242; 2000, c. 39, s. 229; 2001, c. 51, s. 212; 2005, c. 23, s. 241; 2005, c. 38, s. 307; 2007, c. 12, s. 236; 2009, c. 15, s. 384; 2010, c. 5, s. 191.
1129.2. Any corporation that is deemed, under section 1029.8.35, to have paid to the Minister an amount as partial payment of its tax payable for any given taxation year under Part I, in respect of a property that is a Québec film production, shall pay tax, for a particular taxation year, equal to the aggregate of
(a)  the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount it is deemed, under the said section 1029.8.35, to have so paid to the Minister in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is tax the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, where
i.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a Québec film production by reason of the fact that the favourable advance ruling issued by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles in respect of the property, ceases to be in force at that time and that no certificate is issued by the Société in respect of the property, or of the fact that the certificate issued by the Société in respect of the property is revoked at that time, or
ii.  the particular year is the first year for which subparagraph b of the third paragraph of section 1029.8.35 applies in respect of the property or, where applicable, would have been such first year had the qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure of the corporation for the particular year in respect of the property not been nil;
(a.1)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property nor have been in any preceding taxation year and the corporation ceases in the particular year to be recognized as a qualified corporation not dealing at arm’s length with another corporation that holds a broadcasting licence issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes in the particular year the qualification certificate referred to in paragraph a.3 of the definition of “qualified corporation” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34 that was issued to the corporation, for any given taxation year, the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35 in respect of the property for the given taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for the given taxation year; and
(b)  (subparagraph repealed);
(c)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a or in subparagraph a.1 are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property and the situations described in those subparagraphs i and ii have not been encountered in any preceding taxation year, the amount determined in respect of the corporation under the second paragraph in cases where
i.  in computing the amount determined under subparagraph ii of paragraph a or subparagraph i of paragraph b of the definitions of “qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure”, “qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area” and “qualified labour expenditure” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34, government assistance or non-government assistance that the corporation, another person, within the meaning of section 1, or a partnership has received, is entitled to receive or may reasonably expect to receive, on or before the corporation’s filing-due date for the particular year must be taken into account, for or from the particular year in respect of the property, and the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation in a taxation year preceding the particular year,
ii.  an amount relating to an expenditure included in a qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure in respect of the property, or relating to production costs directly attributable to the production of the property, other than an amount of assistance to which subparagraph i applies, is, during the particular taxation year, directly or indirectly, refunded or otherwise paid to the corporation or allocated to a payment to be made by the corporation,
iii.  the corporation ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a regional corporation by reason of the fact that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation for any year and certifying that it qualifies for the purposes of subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35,
iv.  an amount relating to an expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to services rendered in any year outside the Montréal area in relation to a regional production, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, or
v.  an amount relating to a computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to an amount paid in any year for activities related to computer-aided special effects and animation, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property;
(d)  (subparagraph repealed).
The amount to which subparagraph c of the first paragraph refers, in respect of a property, is equal, for the corporation, to the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of
(a)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation would have been deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, if
i.  where subparagraph i of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the assistance referred to in that subparagraph i had been received by the corporation, the other person or the partnership in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation,
ii.  where subparagraph ii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, any amount referred to in that subparagraph ii had been refunded, paid or allocated in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the amount is attributable were incurred,
iii.  where subparagraph iii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister under subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, had been equal to zero for the taxation year in respect of which the certificate is revoked, and
iv.  where subparagraph iv or v of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount had not been indicated for the year referred to in any of those subparagraphs on the document that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles had then enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property; and
(b)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part, in respect of the property, for a taxation year preceding the particular year.
Furthermore, where applicable, the corporation that controls, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever, the corporation referred to in the first paragraph is liable, solidarily with that corporation, for payment of the tax under the first paragraph.
1992, c. 1, s. 204; 1994, c. 21, s. 50; 1995, c. 1, s. 199; 1997, c. 3, s. 71; 1997, c. 14, s. 263; 1997, c. 31, s. 133; 1997, c. 85, s. 301; 1999, c. 83, s. 242; 2000, c. 39, s. 229; 2001, c. 51, s. 212; 2005, c. 23, s. 241; 2005, c. 38, s. 307; 2007, c. 12, s. 236; 2009, c. 15, s. 384.
1129.2. Any corporation that is deemed, under section 1029.8.35, to have paid to the Minister an amount as partial payment of its tax payable for any given taxation year under Part I, in respect of a property that is a Québec film production, shall pay tax, for a particular taxation year, equal to the aggregate of
(a)  the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount it is deemed, under the said section 1029.8.35, to have so paid to the Minister in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is tax the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, where
i.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a Québec film production by reason of the fact that the favourable advance ruling issued by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles in respect of the property, ceases to be in force at that time and that no certificate is issued by the Société in respect of the property, or of the fact that the certificate issued by the Société in respect of the property is revoked at that time, or
ii.  the particular year is the first year for which subparagraph b of the third paragraph of section 1029.8.35 applies in respect of the property or, where applicable, would have been such first year had the qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure of the corporation for the particular year in respect of the property not been nil;
(a.1)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property nor have been in any preceding taxation year and the corporation ceases in the particular year to be recognized as a qualified corporation not dealing at arm’s length with another corporation that holds a broadcasting licence issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes in the particular year the qualification certificate issued to the corporation, for any given taxation year, to the effect that more than 50% of its production costs for the three preceding taxation years during which it produced productions were incurred in relation to productions broadcast by unrelated third parties, the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35 in respect of the property for the given taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for the given taxation year;
(b)  (subparagraph repealed);
(c)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a or in subparagraph a.1 are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property and the situations described in those subparagraphs i and ii have not been encountered in any preceding taxation year, the amount determined in respect of the corporation under the second paragraph in cases where
i.  in computing the amount determined under subparagraph ii of paragraph a or subparagraph i of paragraph b of the definitions of “qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure”, “qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area” and “qualified labour expenditure” in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34, government assistance or non-government assistance that the corporation, another person, within the meaning of section 1, or a partnership has received, is entitled to receive or may reasonably expect to receive, on or before the corporation’s filing-due date for the particular year must be taken into account, for or from the particular year in respect of the property, and the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation in a taxation year preceding the particular year,
ii.  an amount relating to an expenditure included in a qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure in respect of the property, or relating to production costs directly attributable to the production of the property, other than an amount of assistance to which subparagraph i applies, is, during the particular taxation year, directly or indirectly, refunded or otherwise paid to the corporation or allocated to a payment to be made by the corporation,
iii.  the corporation ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a regional corporation by reason of the fact that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation for any year and certifying that it qualifies for the purposes of subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35,
iv.  an amount relating to an expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to services rendered in any year outside the Montréal area in relation to a regional production, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, or
v.  an amount relating to a computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to an amount paid in any year for activities related to computer-aided special effects and animation, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property;
(d)  (subparagraph repealed).
The amount to which subparagraph c of the first paragraph refers, in respect of a property, is equal, for the corporation, to the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of
(a)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation would have been deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, if
i.  where subparagraph i of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the assistance referred to in that subparagraph i had been received by the corporation, the other person or the partnership in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the assistance is attributable or relates were incurred by the corporation,
ii.  where subparagraph ii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, any amount referred to in that subparagraph ii had been refunded, paid or allocated in the year during which the expenditure or costs to which the amount is attributable were incurred,
iii.  where subparagraph iii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister under subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, had been equal to zero for the taxation year in respect of which the certificate is revoked, and
iv.  where subparagraph iv or v of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount had not been indicated for the year referred to in any of those subparagraphs on the document that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles had then enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property; and
(b)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part, in respect of the property, for a taxation year preceding the particular year.
Furthermore, where applicable, the corporation that controls, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever, the corporation referred to in the first paragraph is liable, solidarily with that corporation, for payment of the tax under the first paragraph.
1992, c. 1, s. 204; 1994, c. 21, s. 50; 1995, c. 1, s. 199; 1997, c. 3, s. 71; 1997, c. 14, s. 263; 1997, c. 31, s. 133; 1997, c. 85, s. 301; 1999, c. 83, s. 242; 2000, c. 39, s. 229; 2001, c. 51, s. 212; 2005, c. 23, s. 241; 2005, c. 38, s. 307; 2007, c. 12, s. 236.
1129.2. Any corporation that is deemed, under section 1029.8.35, to have paid to the Minister an amount as partial payment of its tax payable for any given taxation year under Part I, in respect of a property that is a Québec film production, shall pay tax, for a particular taxation year, equal to the aggregate of
(a)  the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount it is deemed, under the said section 1029.8.35, to have so paid to the Minister in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is tax the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for a taxation year preceding the particular year, where
i.  the property ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a Québec film production by reason of the fact that the favourable advance ruling issued by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles in respect of the property, ceases to be in force at that time and that no certificate is issued by the Société in respect of the property, or of the fact that the certificate issued by the Société in respect of the property is revoked at that time, or
ii.  the particular year is the first year for which subparagraph b of the third paragraph of section 1029.8.35 applies in respect of the property or, where applicable, would have been such first year had the qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure of the corporation for the particular year in respect of the property not been nil;
(a.1)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property nor have been in any preceding taxation year and the corporation ceases in the particular year to be recognized as a qualified corporation not dealing at arm’s length with another corporation that holds a broadcasting licence issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission because the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes in the particular year the qualification certificate issued to the corporation, for any given taxation year, to the effect that at least 75% of its production costs for the preceding year were incurred in relation to productions broadcast by unrelated third parties, the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35 in respect of the property for the given taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part in respect of the property for the given taxation year;
(b)  (subparagraph repealed);
(c)  where the situations described in subparagraphs i and ii of subparagraph a or in subparagraph a.1 are not encountered in the particular year in relation to the property and the situations described in those subparagraphs i and ii have not been encountered in any preceding taxation year, the amount determined in respect of the corporation under the second paragraph in cases where
i.  any government assistance or non-government assistance that the corporation has received, is entitled to receive or may reasonably expect to receive on or before its filing-due date, within the meaning of section 1, for the particular year must be taken into account, for or from the particular year and in respect of the property, in computing the amount determined under subparagraph ii of paragraph a or subparagraph i of paragraph b of the definition of "qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area", of "qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure" and of "qualified labour expenditure" in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.34, and the expenditure to which the assistance is attributable has been incurred by the corporation in a taxation year preceding the particular year,
ii.  an amount relating to an expenditure included in a qualified expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area, qualified computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure or qualified labour expenditure in respect of the property, other than the amount of an assistance to which subparagraph i applies, is, during the particular taxation year, directly or indirectly, refunded or otherwise paid to the corporation or allocated to a payment to be made by the corporation;
iii.  the corporation ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as a regional corporation by reason of the fact that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles revokes, in the particular year, the certificate issued to the corporation for any year and certifying that it qualifies for the purposes of subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35,
iv.  an amount relating to an expenditure for services rendered outside the Montréal area ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to services rendered in any year outside the Montréal area in relation to a regional production, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property, or
v.  an amount relating to a computer-aided special effects and animation expenditure ceases, in the particular year, to be considered as attributable to an amount paid in any year for activities related to computer-aided special effects and animation, by reason of a revocation by the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles, that relates to that amount indicated, by budgetary item, on a document enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property;
(d)  (subparagraph repealed).
The amount to which subparagraph c of the first paragraph refers, in respect of a property, is equal, for the corporation, to the amount by which the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation is deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, exceeds the aggregate of
(a)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the corporation would have been deemed to have paid to the Minister under section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property for the particular year or for a preceding taxation year, if
i.  where subparagraph i of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the assistance referred to in that subparagraph i had been received by the corporation in the year during which the expenditure to which the assistance is attributable was incurred,
ii.  where subparagraph ii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, any amount referred to in that subparagraph ii had been refunded, paid or allocated in the year during which the expenditure to which that amount is attributable was incurred,
iii.  where subparagraph iii of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount that it is deemed to have paid to the Minister under subparagraph a.1 of the first paragraph of section 1029.8.35, in respect of the property, had been equal to zero for the taxation year in respect of which the certificate is revoked, and
iv.  where subparagraph iv or v of subparagraph c of the first paragraph applies, the amount had not been indicated for the year referred to in any of those subparagraphs on the document that the Société de développement des entreprises culturelles had then enclosed with the advance ruling given or the certificate issued to the corporation in relation to the property; and
(b)  the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a tax that the corporation is required to pay under this Part, in respect of the property, for a taxation year preceding the particular year.
Furthermore, where applicable, the corporation that controls, directly or indirectly in any manner whatever, the corporation referred to in the first paragraph is liable, solidarily with that corporation, for payment of the tax under the first paragraph.
1992, c. 1, s. 204; 1994, c. 21, s. 50; 1995, c. 1, s. 199; 1997, c. 3, s. 71; 1997, c. 14, s. 263; 1997, c. 31, s. 133; 1997, c. 85, s. 301; 1999, c. 83, s. 242; 2000, c. 39, s. 229; 2001, c. 51, s. 212; 2005, c. 23, s. 241; 2005, c. 38, s. 307.