R-9 - Act respecting the Québec Pension Plan

Full text
186. Retraite Québec may, on the application of an interested person, review any decision it has rendered.
The application must be made in writing within 90 days from the date on which the contested decision was sent, and must state briefly the grounds on which it is based.
Retraite Québec may extend the time limit or relieve a person of the consequences of his failure to comply with it if the person shows that the application for review cannot or could not, for a valid reason, be made within the prescribed time.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58; 1989, c. 55, s. 39; 1993, c. 15, s. 75; 1997, c. 43, s. 617; 2008, c. 21, s. 58; 2015, c. 20, s. 61; 2018, c. 22018, c. 2, s. 85.
186. Retraite Québec may, on the application of an interested person, review any decision it has rendered.
The application must be made in writing within 90 days from the date on which the contested decision was notified, and must state briefly the grounds on which it is based.
Retraite Québec may extend the time limit or relieve a person of the consequences of his failure to comply with it if the person shows that the application for review cannot or could not, for a valid reason, be made within the prescribed time.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58; 1989, c. 55, s. 39; 1993, c. 15, s. 75; 1997, c. 43, s. 617; 2008, c. 21, s. 58; 2015, c. 20, s. 61.
186. The Board may, on the application of an interested person, review any decision it has rendered.
The application must be made in writing within 90 days from the date on which the contested decision was notified, and must state briefly the grounds on which it is based.
The Board may extend the time limit or relieve a person of the consequences of his failure to comply with it if the person shows that the application for review cannot or could not, for a valid reason, be made within the prescribed time.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58; 1989, c. 55, s. 39; 1993, c. 15, s. 75; 1997, c. 43, s. 617; 2008, c. 21, s. 58.
186. The Board may, on the application of an interested person, review any decision it has rendered.
The application must be made in writing within one year from the date on which the contested decision was notified, and must state briefly the grounds on which it is based.
The Board may extend the time limit or relieve a person of the consequences of his failure to comply with it if the person shows that the application for review cannot or could not, for a valid reason, be made within the prescribed time.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58; 1989, c. 55, s. 39; 1993, c. 15, s. 75; 1997, c. 43, s. 617.
186. Any interested person may, within one year after the mailing of a decision of the Board, apply in writing for a review of that decision. The application for review must state briefly the grounds on which it is based.
The Board may relieve a person of the consequences of his failure to make such an application within the time prescribed if that person shows that he could not do so for a valid reason.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58; 1989, c. 55, s. 39; 1993, c. 15, s. 75.
186. Where an applicant or a beneficiary is dissatisfied with any decision made on an application for a benefit with respect to his eligibility thereto or the amount thereof or of a decision made as to the unadjusted pensionable earnings of a former spouse, he may, in the year following the date of the mailing of such decision, apply to the Board for a reconsideration of such decision.
The Board shall thereupon reconsider the decision forthwith.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58; 1989, c. 55, s. 39.
186. Where an applicant or a beneficiary is dissatisfied with any decision made on an application for a benefit with respect to his eligibility thereto or the amount thereof, he may, in the year following the date of the mailing of such decision, apply to the Board for a reconsideration of such decision.
The Board shall thereupon reconsider the decision forthwith.
1965 (1st sess.), c. 24, s. 194; 1972, c. 53, s. 58.