P-41.1 - Act respecting the preservation of agricultural land and agricultural activities

Full text
79.14. Where the mediator refuses or ceases to examine an application, he shall advise, in writing, the warden of the regional county municipality or the director, as the case may be, as well as the applicant, the local municipality and any interested persons having forwarded to him written submissions of the grounds for his decision.
1989, c. 7, s. 26; 1996, c. 26, s. 47; 2010, c. 10, s. 147.
79.14. Where the mediator refuses or ceases to examine an application, he shall advise, in writing, the warden of the regional county municipality, the chairman of the community or the director, as the case may be, as well as the applicant, the local municipality and any interested persons having forwarded to him written submissions of the grounds for his decision.
1989, c. 7, s. 26; 1996, c. 26, s. 47.
79.14. Where a plaintiff or applicant in an action or proceedings against a person who carries on farming activities in an agricultural zone claims
(1)  damages by reason of dust, odors or noise resulting from farming activities, or
(2)  an injunction with a view to preventing the carrying on of farming activities,
the plaintiff or applicant has, in particular, the burden to prove, for the purpose of establishing responsibility, that the person who carries on farming activities has acted illegally or has contravened the regulations or orders made under the Environment Quality Act (chapter Q-2) with respect to dust, odors or noise resulting from farming activities.
1989, c. 7, s. 26.