E-2.3 - Act respecting school elections to elect certain members of the boards of directors of English-language school service centres

Full text
223.1. Every offence described in paragraphs 1 to 4.1 of section 212, in paragraph 4 of section 213, in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10 of section 214, in paragraphs 1 and 3 of section 215, in sections 216, 217, 219, 219.2 and 219.3, in paragraphs 2 to 4 of section 219.8, and in section 219.21 to the extent that it is an offence described in any of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of section 219.8 is a corrupt electoral practice.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an offence under subparagraph 1 of the first paragraph of section 219.2, the judge may rule that the alleged offence is not a corrupt electoral practice if
(1)  the election expenses exceed the maximum amount allowed either with the permission of the director general of the English-language school service centre granted pursuant to section 206.55 or following a court decision on the contestation of a claim;
(2)  the refusal or failure to pay the contested claim arises from an error made in good faith.
1990, c. 35, s. 15; 2002, c. 10, s. 91; 2010, c. 32, s. 44; 2020, c. 12020, c. 1, s. 264.
223.1. Every offence described in paragraphs 1 to 4.1 of section 212, in paragraph 4 of section 213, in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10 of section 214, in paragraphs 1 and 3 of section 215, in sections 216, 217, 219, 219.2 and 219.3, in paragraphs 2 to 4 of section 219.8, and in section 219.21 to the extent that it is an offence described in any of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of section 219.8 is a corrupt electoral practice.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an offence under subparagraph 1 of the first paragraph of section 219.2, the judge may rule that the alleged offence is not a corrupt electoral practice if
(1)  the election expenses exceed the maximum amount allowed either with the permission of the director general of the school board granted pursuant to section 206.55 or following a court decision on the contestation of a claim;
(2)  the refusal or failure to pay the contested claim arises from an error made in good faith.
1990, c. 35, s. 15; 2002, c. 10, s. 91; 2010, c. 32, s. 44.
223.1. Every offence described in paragraphs 1 to 4.1 of section 212, in paragraph 4 of section 213, in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10 of section 214, in paragraphs 1 and 3 of section 215 and in sections 216, 217, 219, 219.2 and 219.3 is a corrupt electoral practice.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an offence under subparagraph 1 of the first paragraph of section 219.2, the judge may rule that the alleged offence is not a corrupt electoral practice if
(1)  the election expenses exceed the maximum amount allowed either with the permission of the director general of the school board granted pursuant to section 206.55 or following a court decision on the contestation of a claim;
(2)  the refusal or failure to pay the contested claim arises from an error made in good faith.
1990, c. 35, s. 15; 2002, c. 10, s. 91.
223.1. Every offence described in paragraphs 1 to 4 of section 212, in paragraph 4 of section 213, in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10 of section 214, in paragraphs 1 and 3 of section 215 and in sections 216, 217 and 219 is a corrupt electoral practice.
1990, c. 35, s. 15.