C-33.01 - Act respecting the Commission de développement de la Métropole

Full text
90. If the Commission considers that a development plan revised before the date of coming into force of the first metropolitan land use plan is inconsistent with the latter plan, it shall inform the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Greater Montréal.
If the Minister, after receiving the notice of the Commission or acting on his own initiative, considers that the development plan of a regional county municipality or of the Communauté urbaine de Montréal is inconsistent with the metropolitan land use plan, he shall request that the municipality or urban community amend its plan to ensure its conformity within the time he prescribes, which may not exceed six months.
Upon a failure by the regional county municipality or urban community to amend its development plan within the prescribed time, the Government shall adopt amendments to the plan.
The amended plan, once adopted by the Government, shall become the development plan of the municipality or urban community concerned.
1997, c. 44, s. 90; 1999, c. 43, s. 13.
90. If the Commission considers that a development plan revised before the date of coming into force of the first metropolitan land use plan is inconsistent with the latter plan, it shall inform the Minister of Municipal Affairs.
If the Minister, after receiving the notice of the Commission or acting on his own initiative, considers that the development plan of a regional county municipality or of the Communauté urbaine de Montréal is inconsistent with the metropolitan land use plan, he shall request that the municipality or urban community amend its plan to ensure its conformity within the time he prescribes, which may not exceed six months.
Upon a failure by the regional county municipality or urban community to amend its development plan within the prescribed time, the Government shall adopt amendments to the plan.
The amended plan, once adopted by the Government, shall become the development plan of the municipality or urban community concerned.
1997, c. 44, s. 90.