A-29 - Health Insurance Act

Full text
51. If no proceeding has been brought at the expiry of the time for bringing a proceeding under the third paragraph of section 50, the Board may issue a certificate stating the name and address of the professional and attesting the amount of the debt and the professional’s failure to contest the Board’s decision before the Administrative Tribunal of Québec.
On the filing of the certificate at the office of the competent court, the decision becomes enforceable as if it were a final judgment of that court, is not subject to appeal, and has all the effects of such a judgment.
The second paragraph of section 18.3.2 applies, with the necessary modifications, to a professional to whom this section applies.
No recommendation of a revisory committee may be interpreted as approving or disapproving the competence of a professional contemplated in it or the quality of the acts in question.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229; 1979, c. 1, s. 38; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 1997, c. 43, s. 64; 1999, c. 40, s. 29; 2005, c. 40, s. 37; 2016, c. 282016, c. 28, s. 26.
51. If no proceeding has been brought at the expiry of the time for bringing a proceeding under the second paragraph of section 50, the Board may issue a certificate stating the name and address of the professional and attesting the amount of the debt and the professional’s failure to contest the Board’s decision before the Administrative Tribunal of Québec.
On the filing of the certificate at the office of the competent court, the decision becomes enforceable as if it were a final judgment of that court, is not subject to appeal, and has all the effects of such a judgment.
The second paragraph of section 18.3.2 applies, with the necessary modifications, to a professional to whom this section applies.
No recommendation of a revisory committee may be interpreted as approving or disapproving the competence of a professional contemplated in it or the quality of the acts in question.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229; 1979, c. 1, s. 38; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 1997, c. 43, s. 64; 1999, c. 40, s. 29; 2005, c. 40, s. 37.
51. The decision of the Board may be homologated, upon its request, by the Superior Court or the Court of Québec according to their respective jurisdictions, at the expiration of the time for bringing a proceeding under the second paragraph of section 50, if no proceeding is brought before the Administrative Tribunal of Québec, and, in that case, the decision of the Board becomes executory under the authority of the court which homologated it.
No recommendation of a revisory committee may be interpreted as approving or disapproving the competence of a professional contemplated in it or the quality of the acts in question.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229; 1979, c. 1, s. 38; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 1997, c. 43, s. 64; 1999, c. 40, s. 29.
51. The decision of the Board may be homologated, upon its request, by the Superior Court or the Court of Québec according to their respective jurisdictions, at the expiration of the time for bringing a proceeding under the second paragraph of section 50, if no proceeding is brought before the Administrative Tribunal of Québec, and, in that case, the decision of the Board becomes executory under the authority of the court which homologated it.
No recommendation of a revisory committee may be interpreted as approving or disapproving the competence of a professional contemplated in it or the quality of the acts in question.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229; 1979, c. 1, s. 38; 1988, c. 21, s. 66; 1997, c. 43, s. 64.
51. The decision of the Board may be homologated, upon its request, by the Superior Court or the Court of Québec according to their respective jurisdictions, at the expiration of the delay for appeal, and the judgment becomes executory under the authority of the court which homologated it.
No recommendation of a revisory committee may be interpreted as approving or disapproving the competence of a professional contemplated in it or the quality of the acts in question.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229; 1979, c. 1, s. 38; 1988, c. 21, s. 66.
51. The decision of the Board may be homologated, upon its request, by the Superior Court or the Provincial Court according to their respective jurisdictions, at the expiration of the delay for appeal, and the judgment becomes executory under the authority of the court which homologated it.
No recommendation of a revisory committee may be interpreted as approving or disapproving the competence of a professional contemplated in it or the quality of the acts in question.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229; 1979, c. 1, s. 38.
51. Whenever, following a recommendation of a revisory committee, the Board refuses to pay a physician, dentist or optometrist for insured services he has rendered, or reduces the amount of the payment claimed for such services or it requires the reimbursement of any overpayment, it must immediately and in writing inform such physician, dentist or optometrist, and the Ordre des médecins du Québec, the Ordre des dentistes du Québec or the Ordre des optométristes du Québec, as the case may be, with the reasons for its decision.
1970, c. 37, s. 38; 1970, c. 38, s. 13; 1973, c. 30, s. 9; 1973, c. 46, s. 43; 1973, c. 49, s. 40, s. 45; 1973, c. 52, s. 27; 1977, c. 5, s. 229.